- This topic has 205 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 26, 2008 at 9:32 AM #143433January 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM #143192GoUSCParticipant
Wow this sure is a sign of the times. Since when is being financially responsible a bad thing? It amazes me, I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.
Sad where we have come.
January 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM #143429GoUSCParticipantWow this sure is a sign of the times. Since when is being financially responsible a bad thing? It amazes me, I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.
Sad where we have come.
January 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM #143436GoUSCParticipantWow this sure is a sign of the times. Since when is being financially responsible a bad thing? It amazes me, I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.
Sad where we have come.
January 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM #143461GoUSCParticipantWow this sure is a sign of the times. Since when is being financially responsible a bad thing? It amazes me, I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.
Sad where we have come.
January 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM #143531GoUSCParticipantWow this sure is a sign of the times. Since when is being financially responsible a bad thing? It amazes me, I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.
Sad where we have come.
January 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM #143213paramountParticipant“I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.”
Aren’t you special…
January 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM #143449paramountParticipant“I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.”
Aren’t you special…
January 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM #143457paramountParticipant“I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.”
Aren’t you special…
January 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM #143481paramountParticipant“I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.”
Aren’t you special…
January 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM #143551paramountParticipant“I have a family member that makes a lot less than me. I find myself being much more careful about what I spend money on then him when he should be the one counting his pennies.”
Aren’t you special…
February 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM #150405AnonymousGuestDuh, because they weren’t able to “put in”.
Income taxes for working people are mandatory, not voluntary.
Believe it or not, most low income persons would rather be paying taxes. What does that say for high income fetchers who do everything they can to avoid paying taxes?
Generally, low income persons are not in that position because they chose to be. Typically, they are victims of a terrible social and educational system, artfully designed by, guess who?
There has been much mention of the “burden” of taxes. I think that most of those who speak this word don’t know the meaning of the word. High income is certainly not a burden and if its reduction by the final amount of taxes such fetchers usually pay somehow deprives them of food and shelter and medical services, then they’re doing something wrong.
Low income persons carry a true burden for themselves and their children and they are kept powerless to do anything about it.
Try giving up your “burden” for theirs, you wouldn’t last a week!
February 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM #150663AnonymousGuestDuh, because they weren’t able to “put in”.
Income taxes for working people are mandatory, not voluntary.
Believe it or not, most low income persons would rather be paying taxes. What does that say for high income fetchers who do everything they can to avoid paying taxes?
Generally, low income persons are not in that position because they chose to be. Typically, they are victims of a terrible social and educational system, artfully designed by, guess who?
There has been much mention of the “burden” of taxes. I think that most of those who speak this word don’t know the meaning of the word. High income is certainly not a burden and if its reduction by the final amount of taxes such fetchers usually pay somehow deprives them of food and shelter and medical services, then they’re doing something wrong.
Low income persons carry a true burden for themselves and their children and they are kept powerless to do anything about it.
Try giving up your “burden” for theirs, you wouldn’t last a week!
February 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM #150676AnonymousGuestDuh, because they weren’t able to “put in”.
Income taxes for working people are mandatory, not voluntary.
Believe it or not, most low income persons would rather be paying taxes. What does that say for high income fetchers who do everything they can to avoid paying taxes?
Generally, low income persons are not in that position because they chose to be. Typically, they are victims of a terrible social and educational system, artfully designed by, guess who?
There has been much mention of the “burden” of taxes. I think that most of those who speak this word don’t know the meaning of the word. High income is certainly not a burden and if its reduction by the final amount of taxes such fetchers usually pay somehow deprives them of food and shelter and medical services, then they’re doing something wrong.
Low income persons carry a true burden for themselves and their children and they are kept powerless to do anything about it.
Try giving up your “burden” for theirs, you wouldn’t last a week!
February 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM #150691AnonymousGuestDuh, because they weren’t able to “put in”.
Income taxes for working people are mandatory, not voluntary.
Believe it or not, most low income persons would rather be paying taxes. What does that say for high income fetchers who do everything they can to avoid paying taxes?
Generally, low income persons are not in that position because they chose to be. Typically, they are victims of a terrible social and educational system, artfully designed by, guess who?
There has been much mention of the “burden” of taxes. I think that most of those who speak this word don’t know the meaning of the word. High income is certainly not a burden and if its reduction by the final amount of taxes such fetchers usually pay somehow deprives them of food and shelter and medical services, then they’re doing something wrong.
Low income persons carry a true burden for themselves and their children and they are kept powerless to do anything about it.
Try giving up your “burden” for theirs, you wouldn’t last a week!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.