- This topic has 24 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by cyphire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 11, 2007 at 1:53 PM #10883November 11, 2007 at 5:17 PM #98517EugeneParticipant
First of all, I’m getting $247k qualifying income based on front debt-to-income ratio of 28%. I don’t see why someone with $200k in the bank would have 2k/month credit card payments.
Second of all, private lenders are not bound by 28%/36% DTI ratios, these only apply to government backed loans (which you won’t be getting anyway because your mortgage is above 417k). As far as I know, pre-credit crunch, lenders were often willing to make mortgages with DTI ratios as high as 45%. I’m not sure what the situation is today.
Finally, there are more rich folks than coastal houses around here. There are roughly 30k houses in the county north of 52 and west of 5. Compare with 100k families with liquid net worth above $1m and 50k families with gross annual incomes above 200k.
November 11, 2007 at 5:17 PM #98583EugeneParticipantFirst of all, I’m getting $247k qualifying income based on front debt-to-income ratio of 28%. I don’t see why someone with $200k in the bank would have 2k/month credit card payments.
Second of all, private lenders are not bound by 28%/36% DTI ratios, these only apply to government backed loans (which you won’t be getting anyway because your mortgage is above 417k). As far as I know, pre-credit crunch, lenders were often willing to make mortgages with DTI ratios as high as 45%. I’m not sure what the situation is today.
Finally, there are more rich folks than coastal houses around here. There are roughly 30k houses in the county north of 52 and west of 5. Compare with 100k families with liquid net worth above $1m and 50k families with gross annual incomes above 200k.
November 11, 2007 at 5:17 PM #98593EugeneParticipantFirst of all, I’m getting $247k qualifying income based on front debt-to-income ratio of 28%. I don’t see why someone with $200k in the bank would have 2k/month credit card payments.
Second of all, private lenders are not bound by 28%/36% DTI ratios, these only apply to government backed loans (which you won’t be getting anyway because your mortgage is above 417k). As far as I know, pre-credit crunch, lenders were often willing to make mortgages with DTI ratios as high as 45%. I’m not sure what the situation is today.
Finally, there are more rich folks than coastal houses around here. There are roughly 30k houses in the county north of 52 and west of 5. Compare with 100k families with liquid net worth above $1m and 50k families with gross annual incomes above 200k.
November 11, 2007 at 5:17 PM #98597EugeneParticipantFirst of all, I’m getting $247k qualifying income based on front debt-to-income ratio of 28%. I don’t see why someone with $200k in the bank would have 2k/month credit card payments.
Second of all, private lenders are not bound by 28%/36% DTI ratios, these only apply to government backed loans (which you won’t be getting anyway because your mortgage is above 417k). As far as I know, pre-credit crunch, lenders were often willing to make mortgages with DTI ratios as high as 45%. I’m not sure what the situation is today.
Finally, there are more rich folks than coastal houses around here. There are roughly 30k houses in the county north of 52 and west of 5. Compare with 100k families with liquid net worth above $1m and 50k families with gross annual incomes above 200k.
November 12, 2007 at 8:59 AM #98721raptorduckParticipantMaybe this will make you feel better. Up here in the Bay Area, $1 million will get you 2,500 sf 4BR tract house on 4k sf lot in San Jose, or 1,200 sf 60 yr old ranch home on 6k sf lot in Mountain View, or nothing in Los Altos, not even a bare 4k sf vacant lot. And we are in a “down” market here as well.
November 12, 2007 at 8:59 AM #98717raptorduckParticipantMaybe this will make you feel better. Up here in the Bay Area, $1 million will get you 2,500 sf 4BR tract house on 4k sf lot in San Jose, or 1,200 sf 60 yr old ranch home on 6k sf lot in Mountain View, or nothing in Los Altos, not even a bare 4k sf vacant lot. And we are in a “down” market here as well.
November 12, 2007 at 8:59 AM #98704raptorduckParticipantMaybe this will make you feel better. Up here in the Bay Area, $1 million will get you 2,500 sf 4BR tract house on 4k sf lot in San Jose, or 1,200 sf 60 yr old ranch home on 6k sf lot in Mountain View, or nothing in Los Altos, not even a bare 4k sf vacant lot. And we are in a “down” market here as well.
November 12, 2007 at 8:59 AM #98642raptorduckParticipantMaybe this will make you feel better. Up here in the Bay Area, $1 million will get you 2,500 sf 4BR tract house on 4k sf lot in San Jose, or 1,200 sf 60 yr old ranch home on 6k sf lot in Mountain View, or nothing in Los Altos, not even a bare 4k sf vacant lot. And we are in a “down” market here as well.
November 12, 2007 at 9:57 AM #98657Alex_angelParticipantWhat youa re saying is complete common sense, yet for some reason it doesn’t seem that way. People are still trying to outbid each other on homes, sales are still happening on over million dollar homes. What seems to be happening is that those who can’t afford are getting pushed out of SD and those who can are moving in. There was a stat that the population of SD is declining, but in reality it is just people that can’t afford to live here that are moving away.
November 12, 2007 at 9:57 AM #98720Alex_angelParticipantWhat youa re saying is complete common sense, yet for some reason it doesn’t seem that way. People are still trying to outbid each other on homes, sales are still happening on over million dollar homes. What seems to be happening is that those who can’t afford are getting pushed out of SD and those who can are moving in. There was a stat that the population of SD is declining, but in reality it is just people that can’t afford to live here that are moving away.
November 12, 2007 at 9:57 AM #98739Alex_angelParticipantWhat youa re saying is complete common sense, yet for some reason it doesn’t seem that way. People are still trying to outbid each other on homes, sales are still happening on over million dollar homes. What seems to be happening is that those who can’t afford are getting pushed out of SD and those who can are moving in. There was a stat that the population of SD is declining, but in reality it is just people that can’t afford to live here that are moving away.
November 12, 2007 at 9:57 AM #98735Alex_angelParticipantWhat youa re saying is complete common sense, yet for some reason it doesn’t seem that way. People are still trying to outbid each other on homes, sales are still happening on over million dollar homes. What seems to be happening is that those who can’t afford are getting pushed out of SD and those who can are moving in. There was a stat that the population of SD is declining, but in reality it is just people that can’t afford to live here that are moving away.
November 12, 2007 at 10:04 AM #98662kev374Participantas far as I can see, the top end of the market is experiencing the most price drops at least here in South Orange County. I have seen $1.2 million houses purchased in 2005 listed now for a loss at $900k. A lot of speculators in that market as well. The top end is getting hammered just like the lower tiers.
As for the statistic about so many buyers for top end homes, using that view is erroneous. I would bet that MOST people with $1 mil. liquid net worth are already homeowners and not creating any significant new demand.
November 12, 2007 at 10:04 AM #98742kev374Participantas far as I can see, the top end of the market is experiencing the most price drops at least here in South Orange County. I have seen $1.2 million houses purchased in 2005 listed now for a loss at $900k. A lot of speculators in that market as well. The top end is getting hammered just like the lower tiers.
As for the statistic about so many buyers for top end homes, using that view is erroneous. I would bet that MOST people with $1 mil. liquid net worth are already homeowners and not creating any significant new demand.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.