Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › QE2 right after Elections?
- This topic has 275 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 10, 2010 at 11:17 AM #629889November 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM #628809
briansd1
GuestI remember someone posting here that refinancing will free up enough cash flow to buy a new BMW.
That’s pretty much what the Fed is trying to do with QE and lower interest rates.
Unfortunately monetary policy dumps money on the banks and at the top of society. It takes a long, long time, if ever, to trickle down to the unemployed who need help the most.
November 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM #628886briansd1
GuestI remember someone posting here that refinancing will free up enough cash flow to buy a new BMW.
That’s pretty much what the Fed is trying to do with QE and lower interest rates.
Unfortunately monetary policy dumps money on the banks and at the top of society. It takes a long, long time, if ever, to trickle down to the unemployed who need help the most.
November 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM #629460briansd1
GuestI remember someone posting here that refinancing will free up enough cash flow to buy a new BMW.
That’s pretty much what the Fed is trying to do with QE and lower interest rates.
Unfortunately monetary policy dumps money on the banks and at the top of society. It takes a long, long time, if ever, to trickle down to the unemployed who need help the most.
November 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM #629587briansd1
GuestI remember someone posting here that refinancing will free up enough cash flow to buy a new BMW.
That’s pretty much what the Fed is trying to do with QE and lower interest rates.
Unfortunately monetary policy dumps money on the banks and at the top of society. It takes a long, long time, if ever, to trickle down to the unemployed who need help the most.
November 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM #629904briansd1
GuestI remember someone posting here that refinancing will free up enough cash flow to buy a new BMW.
That’s pretty much what the Fed is trying to do with QE and lower interest rates.
Unfortunately monetary policy dumps money on the banks and at the top of society. It takes a long, long time, if ever, to trickle down to the unemployed who need help the most.
November 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM #628814briansd1
Guest[quote=Arraya]
GDP is a hopelessly sad way to account for societal health. We’re pathological[/quote]I agree; that’s why I believe that the Scandinavians have it right. They are non-exuberant countries and they are satisfied moving along with slow but consistent improvement to their living standards while preserving their environment.
Notice that the economies based on the Anglo/American model are debt fueled bubbles that periodically pop.
The problem with debt is that once you get hooked, it’s hard to get off.
Our culture is such that we want quick solutions to our problems.
November 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM #628891briansd1
Guest[quote=Arraya]
GDP is a hopelessly sad way to account for societal health. We’re pathological[/quote]I agree; that’s why I believe that the Scandinavians have it right. They are non-exuberant countries and they are satisfied moving along with slow but consistent improvement to their living standards while preserving their environment.
Notice that the economies based on the Anglo/American model are debt fueled bubbles that periodically pop.
The problem with debt is that once you get hooked, it’s hard to get off.
Our culture is such that we want quick solutions to our problems.
November 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM #629465briansd1
Guest[quote=Arraya]
GDP is a hopelessly sad way to account for societal health. We’re pathological[/quote]I agree; that’s why I believe that the Scandinavians have it right. They are non-exuberant countries and they are satisfied moving along with slow but consistent improvement to their living standards while preserving their environment.
Notice that the economies based on the Anglo/American model are debt fueled bubbles that periodically pop.
The problem with debt is that once you get hooked, it’s hard to get off.
Our culture is such that we want quick solutions to our problems.
November 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM #629592briansd1
Guest[quote=Arraya]
GDP is a hopelessly sad way to account for societal health. We’re pathological[/quote]I agree; that’s why I believe that the Scandinavians have it right. They are non-exuberant countries and they are satisfied moving along with slow but consistent improvement to their living standards while preserving their environment.
Notice that the economies based on the Anglo/American model are debt fueled bubbles that periodically pop.
The problem with debt is that once you get hooked, it’s hard to get off.
Our culture is such that we want quick solutions to our problems.
November 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM #629909briansd1
Guest[quote=Arraya]
GDP is a hopelessly sad way to account for societal health. We’re pathological[/quote]I agree; that’s why I believe that the Scandinavians have it right. They are non-exuberant countries and they are satisfied moving along with slow but consistent improvement to their living standards while preserving their environment.
Notice that the economies based on the Anglo/American model are debt fueled bubbles that periodically pop.
The problem with debt is that once you get hooked, it’s hard to get off.
Our culture is such that we want quick solutions to our problems.
November 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM #628829NotCranky
ParticipantAdam, commissions are higher than they should be based on inflated prices due to bailouts of all kinds. Refinances have dropped carrying costs a lot if you were not overleveraged, or not using leverage much in the first place. I guess even some adjustable rate holders are pretty happy.
Your labor is down, I don’t know who is doing your work but you are paying them less than you were a few years back, groceries are up but not much,especially if you buy what you need instead of what you want.
What I am getting at is you that you win some you and lose some. In my opinion inflation isn’t the problem(yet), it is that money was too easy too make before, in real estate and construction. Logically, there is some correction going on.November 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM #628906NotCranky
ParticipantAdam, commissions are higher than they should be based on inflated prices due to bailouts of all kinds. Refinances have dropped carrying costs a lot if you were not overleveraged, or not using leverage much in the first place. I guess even some adjustable rate holders are pretty happy.
Your labor is down, I don’t know who is doing your work but you are paying them less than you were a few years back, groceries are up but not much,especially if you buy what you need instead of what you want.
What I am getting at is you that you win some you and lose some. In my opinion inflation isn’t the problem(yet), it is that money was too easy too make before, in real estate and construction. Logically, there is some correction going on.November 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM #629480NotCranky
ParticipantAdam, commissions are higher than they should be based on inflated prices due to bailouts of all kinds. Refinances have dropped carrying costs a lot if you were not overleveraged, or not using leverage much in the first place. I guess even some adjustable rate holders are pretty happy.
Your labor is down, I don’t know who is doing your work but you are paying them less than you were a few years back, groceries are up but not much,especially if you buy what you need instead of what you want.
What I am getting at is you that you win some you and lose some. In my opinion inflation isn’t the problem(yet), it is that money was too easy too make before, in real estate and construction. Logically, there is some correction going on.November 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM #629607NotCranky
ParticipantAdam, commissions are higher than they should be based on inflated prices due to bailouts of all kinds. Refinances have dropped carrying costs a lot if you were not overleveraged, or not using leverage much in the first place. I guess even some adjustable rate holders are pretty happy.
Your labor is down, I don’t know who is doing your work but you are paying them less than you were a few years back, groceries are up but not much,especially if you buy what you need instead of what you want.
What I am getting at is you that you win some you and lose some. In my opinion inflation isn’t the problem(yet), it is that money was too easy too make before, in real estate and construction. Logically, there is some correction going on. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
