QE2 right after Elections?

[scaredyclassic]

In the middle ages prior to the plague there were so manY people labor was without value. Afther the plague thinned the herd by a third or so, labor was able to demand a premium. My kid is taking euro history and he mentioned this yesterday. Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goalbis to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers. Still, govt monetary policy is going to be nowhere as effective as rats.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]

You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.

[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]

There are at least some powerful people who share this view.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]

You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.

[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]

There are at least some powerful people who share this view.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]

You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.

[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]

There are at least some powerful people who share this view.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]

You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.

[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]

There are at least some powerful people who share this view.

[blahblahblah]

[quote=briansd1]
In the context of the bailout continuing (everyone here seems to agree that the bailouts will continue), would we rather the money continue going to the banks? Or would we rather the money go to jobs for unemployed workers who will build some lasting infrastructure?[/quote]

You and I have no say in the matter. Take a look at what happened to the goons in the last round — NOTHING. They are still in control. What will happen is what they want to happen.

[quote=walterwhite]
Maybe the problem is there are too many of us. Not me of course as I am essential. If the goal is to prop up the system the money should go to the banks. If the goal is to thin the herd then definitely no money should go to workers.[/quote]

There are at least some powerful people who share this view.

[SD Realtor]

Concho you should have sent him a link to the illuminati.

[SD Realtor]

Concho you should have sent him a link to the illuminati.

[SD Realtor]

Concho you should have sent him a link to the illuminati.

[SD Realtor]

Concho you should have sent him a link to the illuminati.

[SD Realtor]

Concho you should have sent him a link to the illuminati.

[briansd1]

I wonder if it’s unpatriotic to align oneself with foreigners in criticizing American policy.

Do foreigners have good ideas and do we care about those ideas? Or are our ideas the best?

The harshest criticism came Friday from German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, who told reporters at a conference that, “With all due respect, U.S. policy is clueless.”

http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/08/news/international/quantitative_easing_global_criticism_g20/index.htm

Sarah Palin aligns herself with China, Russia and Germany in trashing the U.S. Fed’s $600 QE2 economic recovery plan.

http://parkerspitzer.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/08/strange-bedfellows-germany-china-russia-and-sarah/

[briansd1]

I wonder if it’s unpatriotic to align oneself with foreigners in criticizing American policy.

Do foreigners have good ideas and do we care about those ideas? Or are our ideas the best?

The harshest criticism came Friday from German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, who told reporters at a conference that, “With all due respect, U.S. policy is clueless.”

http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/08/news/international/quantitative_easing_global_criticism_g20/index.htm

Sarah Palin aligns herself with China, Russia and Germany in trashing the U.S. Fed’s $600 QE2 economic recovery plan.

http://parkerspitzer.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/08/strange-bedfellows-germany-china-russia-and-sarah/

[briansd1]

I wonder if it’s unpatriotic to align oneself with foreigners in criticizing American policy.

Do foreigners have good ideas and do we care about those ideas? Or are our ideas the best?

The harshest criticism came Friday from German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, who told reporters at a conference that, “With all due respect, U.S. policy is clueless.”

http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/08/news/international/quantitative_easing_global_criticism_g20/index.htm

Sarah Palin aligns herself with China, Russia and Germany in trashing the U.S. Fed’s $600 QE2 economic recovery plan.

http://parkerspitzer.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/08/strange-bedfellows-germany-china-russia-and-sarah/

[briansd1]

I wonder if it’s unpatriotic to align oneself with foreigners in criticizing American policy.

Do foreigners have good ideas and do we care about those ideas? Or are our ideas the best?

The harshest criticism came Friday from German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, who told reporters at a conference that, “With all due respect, U.S. policy is clueless.”

http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/08/news/international/quantitative_easing_global_criticism_g20/index.htm

Sarah Palin aligns herself with China, Russia and Germany in trashing the U.S. Fed’s $600 QE2 economic recovery plan.

http://parkerspitzer.blogs.cnn.com/2010/11/08/strange-bedfellows-germany-china-russia-and-sarah/

[Author]

Posts