- This topic has 130 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2008 at 3:13 PM #156873February 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM #156506pencilneckParticipant
Excellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
February 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM #156789pencilneckParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
February 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM #156791pencilneckParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
February 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM #156807pencilneckParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
February 20, 2008 at 3:20 PM #156883pencilneckParticipantExcellent thread.
How does this apply to fixers? I was looking at a property in the $350k range in a $600k neighborhood. Of course the propery is very run down and needs a lot of work.
If one improved the property I would assume the fair market value would be $600k? This doesn’t seem like any incentive to improve the property.
February 20, 2008 at 3:47 PM #156520Chance the GardenerParticipantpencilneck – the FMV would be the purchase price, not the price after “repairing” the home. If however, you build substantial improvements, such as added square feet or a swim pool, then the home is subject to reassessment – basically your purchase price plus the added value of the substantial improvements. If all you are doing is repairing damage and making improvements within the existing footprint of the home, your home is not subject to reassessment.
February 20, 2008 at 3:47 PM #156804Chance the GardenerParticipantpencilneck – the FMV would be the purchase price, not the price after “repairing” the home. If however, you build substantial improvements, such as added square feet or a swim pool, then the home is subject to reassessment – basically your purchase price plus the added value of the substantial improvements. If all you are doing is repairing damage and making improvements within the existing footprint of the home, your home is not subject to reassessment.
February 20, 2008 at 3:47 PM #156806Chance the GardenerParticipantpencilneck – the FMV would be the purchase price, not the price after “repairing” the home. If however, you build substantial improvements, such as added square feet or a swim pool, then the home is subject to reassessment – basically your purchase price plus the added value of the substantial improvements. If all you are doing is repairing damage and making improvements within the existing footprint of the home, your home is not subject to reassessment.
February 20, 2008 at 3:47 PM #156822Chance the GardenerParticipantpencilneck – the FMV would be the purchase price, not the price after “repairing” the home. If however, you build substantial improvements, such as added square feet or a swim pool, then the home is subject to reassessment – basically your purchase price plus the added value of the substantial improvements. If all you are doing is repairing damage and making improvements within the existing footprint of the home, your home is not subject to reassessment.
February 20, 2008 at 3:47 PM #156897Chance the GardenerParticipantpencilneck – the FMV would be the purchase price, not the price after “repairing” the home. If however, you build substantial improvements, such as added square feet or a swim pool, then the home is subject to reassessment – basically your purchase price plus the added value of the substantial improvements. If all you are doing is repairing damage and making improvements within the existing footprint of the home, your home is not subject to reassessment.
February 20, 2008 at 3:50 PM #156525svelteParticipantIn the 1990s, the county automatically reduced our prop tax for a few years without us applying – I think they were getting swamped with requests and did it to free up their staff.
I haven’t heard of them doing such a thing again in this downturn, so I should get on with applying for a reduction myself this time.
Thanks for this thread – it is the kick in the rear I needed.
February 20, 2008 at 3:50 PM #156809svelteParticipantIn the 1990s, the county automatically reduced our prop tax for a few years without us applying – I think they were getting swamped with requests and did it to free up their staff.
I haven’t heard of them doing such a thing again in this downturn, so I should get on with applying for a reduction myself this time.
Thanks for this thread – it is the kick in the rear I needed.
February 20, 2008 at 3:50 PM #156811svelteParticipantIn the 1990s, the county automatically reduced our prop tax for a few years without us applying – I think they were getting swamped with requests and did it to free up their staff.
I haven’t heard of them doing such a thing again in this downturn, so I should get on with applying for a reduction myself this time.
Thanks for this thread – it is the kick in the rear I needed.
February 20, 2008 at 3:50 PM #156827svelteParticipantIn the 1990s, the county automatically reduced our prop tax for a few years without us applying – I think they were getting swamped with requests and did it to free up their staff.
I haven’t heard of them doing such a thing again in this downturn, so I should get on with applying for a reduction myself this time.
Thanks for this thread – it is the kick in the rear I needed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.