- This topic has 35 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by edna_mode.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2010 at 2:35 AM #606302September 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM #605408edna_modeParticipant
What I am also realizing is how hard it is to figure out from reading my employer’s wording how well it will cover “own-occupation” disabilities. I could see a perverse incentive where the company has every financial motivation (withholding disability payments to keep their premiums lower) to “retrain” a disabled engineer to earn 1/3 the salary as a receptionist. Because hey, you’re still employed right? So you won’t be needing those disability payments…
September 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM #605495edna_modeParticipantWhat I am also realizing is how hard it is to figure out from reading my employer’s wording how well it will cover “own-occupation” disabilities. I could see a perverse incentive where the company has every financial motivation (withholding disability payments to keep their premiums lower) to “retrain” a disabled engineer to earn 1/3 the salary as a receptionist. Because hey, you’re still employed right? So you won’t be needing those disability payments…
September 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM #606047edna_modeParticipantWhat I am also realizing is how hard it is to figure out from reading my employer’s wording how well it will cover “own-occupation” disabilities. I could see a perverse incentive where the company has every financial motivation (withholding disability payments to keep their premiums lower) to “retrain” a disabled engineer to earn 1/3 the salary as a receptionist. Because hey, you’re still employed right? So you won’t be needing those disability payments…
September 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM #606154edna_modeParticipantWhat I am also realizing is how hard it is to figure out from reading my employer’s wording how well it will cover “own-occupation” disabilities. I could see a perverse incentive where the company has every financial motivation (withholding disability payments to keep their premiums lower) to “retrain” a disabled engineer to earn 1/3 the salary as a receptionist. Because hey, you’re still employed right? So you won’t be needing those disability payments…
September 16, 2010 at 11:10 AM #606472edna_modeParticipantWhat I am also realizing is how hard it is to figure out from reading my employer’s wording how well it will cover “own-occupation” disabilities. I could see a perverse incentive where the company has every financial motivation (withholding disability payments to keep their premiums lower) to “retrain” a disabled engineer to earn 1/3 the salary as a receptionist. Because hey, you’re still employed right? So you won’t be needing those disability payments…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.