- This topic has 90 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 4, 2008 at 11:09 PM #266562September 5, 2008 at 7:10 PM #266936RenParticipant
[quote=sdrealtor]
The problem with your posts are they are too loosy goosy for me. The difference between 300K and 400K in the late 90’s was huge. Probably two steps up in size, location and desirability. Throw on 200% gains and you are comparing 900K homes in the same class as 1.2M homes. It’s like comparing a basic Santa Fe Trails home with a very nice Arroyo Vista home. Its too big a spread.
[/quote]
I have no doubt the difference between a 300k and 400k house was huge. I’m not saying that a 300k house had the same gain or will eventually have the same loss as a 400k house. I only use the ranges because it can be more visual than percentages.Nevermind, let’s just move on and bump this in a few years…
September 5, 2008 at 7:10 PM #267028RenParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
The problem with your posts are they are too loosy goosy for me. The difference between 300K and 400K in the late 90’s was huge. Probably two steps up in size, location and desirability. Throw on 200% gains and you are comparing 900K homes in the same class as 1.2M homes. It’s like comparing a basic Santa Fe Trails home with a very nice Arroyo Vista home. Its too big a spread.
[/quote]
I have no doubt the difference between a 300k and 400k house was huge. I’m not saying that a 300k house had the same gain or will eventually have the same loss as a 400k house. I only use the ranges because it can be more visual than percentages.Nevermind, let’s just move on and bump this in a few years…
September 5, 2008 at 7:10 PM #266994RenParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
The problem with your posts are they are too loosy goosy for me. The difference between 300K and 400K in the late 90’s was huge. Probably two steps up in size, location and desirability. Throw on 200% gains and you are comparing 900K homes in the same class as 1.2M homes. It’s like comparing a basic Santa Fe Trails home with a very nice Arroyo Vista home. Its too big a spread.
[/quote]
I have no doubt the difference between a 300k and 400k house was huge. I’m not saying that a 300k house had the same gain or will eventually have the same loss as a 400k house. I only use the ranges because it can be more visual than percentages.Nevermind, let’s just move on and bump this in a few years…
September 5, 2008 at 7:10 PM #266950RenParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
The problem with your posts are they are too loosy goosy for me. The difference between 300K and 400K in the late 90’s was huge. Probably two steps up in size, location and desirability. Throw on 200% gains and you are comparing 900K homes in the same class as 1.2M homes. It’s like comparing a basic Santa Fe Trails home with a very nice Arroyo Vista home. Its too big a spread.
[/quote]
I have no doubt the difference between a 300k and 400k house was huge. I’m not saying that a 300k house had the same gain or will eventually have the same loss as a 400k house. I only use the ranges because it can be more visual than percentages.Nevermind, let’s just move on and bump this in a few years…
September 5, 2008 at 7:10 PM #266718RenParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]
The problem with your posts are they are too loosy goosy for me. The difference between 300K and 400K in the late 90’s was huge. Probably two steps up in size, location and desirability. Throw on 200% gains and you are comparing 900K homes in the same class as 1.2M homes. It’s like comparing a basic Santa Fe Trails home with a very nice Arroyo Vista home. Its too big a spread.
[/quote]
I have no doubt the difference between a 300k and 400k house was huge. I’m not saying that a 300k house had the same gain or will eventually have the same loss as a 400k house. I only use the ranges because it can be more visual than percentages.Nevermind, let’s just move on and bump this in a few years…
September 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #266783sdduuuudeParticipantOne thing that annoys me on this forum is poorly worded predictions. Be bold, make a clear prediction on a specific size/type of house. Then make the the threat of bumping the thread.
Ren – you can bump this thread all you want, but the fact is, your predictions are not clear at all so it won’t prove anything. Earlier you said “$400-500K”. Later you said “see the 500s”, which means 599K. That’s a predicted range of 400 – 599K for a house of non-descript size and location, except to say that they sold somewhere between 300 and 500K 15 years ago.
Here’s one of mine. It aint bad for Sept 8, 2006:
[quote=sdduuuude]Just for the record, I think there is a recession coming … I just think the early 2007 timeline is a bit early … I just think it will take time – very late 2007 or early 2008.[/quote]http://piggington.com/95_of_us_economists_missed_the_last_recession_after_it_had_alrea
Here is a good example of a clear prediction:
[quote=sdrealtor]When all is said and done I believe you will still have to pony up at least 600K to get a nice 4BR between 2500 and 3000 sqft around that is not impaired in some way (i.e. backing to a busy street, trashed, under power lines, tiny yard etc.).[/quote]
I’m not familiar with the area, but if you show me a few nice, unimpaired 4BR houses between 2500 and 3000 sqft under 600K, I’ll know sdr is wrong.
If you show me any house under 500K, I still won’t know if you have actually predicted anything.
I, too, think sdr underestimates the substitution effect on this area but I appreciate his clear predition. He’s a bit rough, but he means well. I thought his sideline comment was kind of funny, actually.
My 2-step suggestion:
1) Grow thick skin.
2) Make better prediction.September 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #267001sdduuuudeParticipantOne thing that annoys me on this forum is poorly worded predictions. Be bold, make a clear prediction on a specific size/type of house. Then make the the threat of bumping the thread.
Ren – you can bump this thread all you want, but the fact is, your predictions are not clear at all so it won’t prove anything. Earlier you said “$400-500K”. Later you said “see the 500s”, which means 599K. That’s a predicted range of 400 – 599K for a house of non-descript size and location, except to say that they sold somewhere between 300 and 500K 15 years ago.
Here’s one of mine. It aint bad for Sept 8, 2006:
[quote=sdduuuude]Just for the record, I think there is a recession coming … I just think the early 2007 timeline is a bit early … I just think it will take time – very late 2007 or early 2008.[/quote]http://piggington.com/95_of_us_economists_missed_the_last_recession_after_it_had_alrea
Here is a good example of a clear prediction:
[quote=sdrealtor]When all is said and done I believe you will still have to pony up at least 600K to get a nice 4BR between 2500 and 3000 sqft around that is not impaired in some way (i.e. backing to a busy street, trashed, under power lines, tiny yard etc.).[/quote]
I’m not familiar with the area, but if you show me a few nice, unimpaired 4BR houses between 2500 and 3000 sqft under 600K, I’ll know sdr is wrong.
If you show me any house under 500K, I still won’t know if you have actually predicted anything.
I, too, think sdr underestimates the substitution effect on this area but I appreciate his clear predition. He’s a bit rough, but he means well. I thought his sideline comment was kind of funny, actually.
My 2-step suggestion:
1) Grow thick skin.
2) Make better prediction.September 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #267015sdduuuudeParticipantOne thing that annoys me on this forum is poorly worded predictions. Be bold, make a clear prediction on a specific size/type of house. Then make the the threat of bumping the thread.
Ren – you can bump this thread all you want, but the fact is, your predictions are not clear at all so it won’t prove anything. Earlier you said “$400-500K”. Later you said “see the 500s”, which means 599K. That’s a predicted range of 400 – 599K for a house of non-descript size and location, except to say that they sold somewhere between 300 and 500K 15 years ago.
Here’s one of mine. It aint bad for Sept 8, 2006:
[quote=sdduuuude]Just for the record, I think there is a recession coming … I just think the early 2007 timeline is a bit early … I just think it will take time – very late 2007 or early 2008.[/quote]http://piggington.com/95_of_us_economists_missed_the_last_recession_after_it_had_alrea
Here is a good example of a clear prediction:
[quote=sdrealtor]When all is said and done I believe you will still have to pony up at least 600K to get a nice 4BR between 2500 and 3000 sqft around that is not impaired in some way (i.e. backing to a busy street, trashed, under power lines, tiny yard etc.).[/quote]
I’m not familiar with the area, but if you show me a few nice, unimpaired 4BR houses between 2500 and 3000 sqft under 600K, I’ll know sdr is wrong.
If you show me any house under 500K, I still won’t know if you have actually predicted anything.
I, too, think sdr underestimates the substitution effect on this area but I appreciate his clear predition. He’s a bit rough, but he means well. I thought his sideline comment was kind of funny, actually.
My 2-step suggestion:
1) Grow thick skin.
2) Make better prediction.September 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #267061sdduuuudeParticipantOne thing that annoys me on this forum is poorly worded predictions. Be bold, make a clear prediction on a specific size/type of house. Then make the the threat of bumping the thread.
Ren – you can bump this thread all you want, but the fact is, your predictions are not clear at all so it won’t prove anything. Earlier you said “$400-500K”. Later you said “see the 500s”, which means 599K. That’s a predicted range of 400 – 599K for a house of non-descript size and location, except to say that they sold somewhere between 300 and 500K 15 years ago.
Here’s one of mine. It aint bad for Sept 8, 2006:
[quote=sdduuuude]Just for the record, I think there is a recession coming … I just think the early 2007 timeline is a bit early … I just think it will take time – very late 2007 or early 2008.[/quote]http://piggington.com/95_of_us_economists_missed_the_last_recession_after_it_had_alrea
Here is a good example of a clear prediction:
[quote=sdrealtor]When all is said and done I believe you will still have to pony up at least 600K to get a nice 4BR between 2500 and 3000 sqft around that is not impaired in some way (i.e. backing to a busy street, trashed, under power lines, tiny yard etc.).[/quote]
I’m not familiar with the area, but if you show me a few nice, unimpaired 4BR houses between 2500 and 3000 sqft under 600K, I’ll know sdr is wrong.
If you show me any house under 500K, I still won’t know if you have actually predicted anything.
I, too, think sdr underestimates the substitution effect on this area but I appreciate his clear predition. He’s a bit rough, but he means well. I thought his sideline comment was kind of funny, actually.
My 2-step suggestion:
1) Grow thick skin.
2) Make better prediction.September 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #267093sdduuuudeParticipantOne thing that annoys me on this forum is poorly worded predictions. Be bold, make a clear prediction on a specific size/type of house. Then make the the threat of bumping the thread.
Ren – you can bump this thread all you want, but the fact is, your predictions are not clear at all so it won’t prove anything. Earlier you said “$400-500K”. Later you said “see the 500s”, which means 599K. That’s a predicted range of 400 – 599K for a house of non-descript size and location, except to say that they sold somewhere between 300 and 500K 15 years ago.
Here’s one of mine. It aint bad for Sept 8, 2006:
[quote=sdduuuude]Just for the record, I think there is a recession coming … I just think the early 2007 timeline is a bit early … I just think it will take time – very late 2007 or early 2008.[/quote]http://piggington.com/95_of_us_economists_missed_the_last_recession_after_it_had_alrea
Here is a good example of a clear prediction:
[quote=sdrealtor]When all is said and done I believe you will still have to pony up at least 600K to get a nice 4BR between 2500 and 3000 sqft around that is not impaired in some way (i.e. backing to a busy street, trashed, under power lines, tiny yard etc.).[/quote]
I’m not familiar with the area, but if you show me a few nice, unimpaired 4BR houses between 2500 and 3000 sqft under 600K, I’ll know sdr is wrong.
If you show me any house under 500K, I still won’t know if you have actually predicted anything.
I, too, think sdr underestimates the substitution effect on this area but I appreciate his clear predition. He’s a bit rough, but he means well. I thought his sideline comment was kind of funny, actually.
My 2-step suggestion:
1) Grow thick skin.
2) Make better prediction.September 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM #267293sdrealtorParticipantThanks sdduuuude,
That is exactly my point. There are too many poorly worded predictions and I dont want to see the “psuedo kreskins” of the blog return with see I was right comments about these broad statements. We all know the direction and have for years around hear. We make money in this world by beating the market not matching. That is the skill not posting a link to some article confirming your biases or making a broad statement that you will be able to find a data point that sorta supports it.Yeah Ren, sometimes I get a bit pissy and thats just me. Its how I get my points across in a crowded noisy blog. I do mean well and wish in my heart of hearts only the best for people (except the dishonest slimebag jerk offs that I despise of which no one on this blog has ever qualified as). The truth is I do mean well and hope everyone here gets the home they want without having to witness the collapse of our economy and the destruction of the lives of foolish/greedy but other good people.
sdr
September 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM #267261sdrealtorParticipantThanks sdduuuude,
That is exactly my point. There are too many poorly worded predictions and I dont want to see the “psuedo kreskins” of the blog return with see I was right comments about these broad statements. We all know the direction and have for years around hear. We make money in this world by beating the market not matching. That is the skill not posting a link to some article confirming your biases or making a broad statement that you will be able to find a data point that sorta supports it.Yeah Ren, sometimes I get a bit pissy and thats just me. Its how I get my points across in a crowded noisy blog. I do mean well and wish in my heart of hearts only the best for people (except the dishonest slimebag jerk offs that I despise of which no one on this blog has ever qualified as). The truth is I do mean well and hope everyone here gets the home they want without having to witness the collapse of our economy and the destruction of the lives of foolish/greedy but other good people.
sdr
September 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM #267215sdrealtorParticipantThanks sdduuuude,
That is exactly my point. There are too many poorly worded predictions and I dont want to see the “psuedo kreskins” of the blog return with see I was right comments about these broad statements. We all know the direction and have for years around hear. We make money in this world by beating the market not matching. That is the skill not posting a link to some article confirming your biases or making a broad statement that you will be able to find a data point that sorta supports it.Yeah Ren, sometimes I get a bit pissy and thats just me. Its how I get my points across in a crowded noisy blog. I do mean well and wish in my heart of hearts only the best for people (except the dishonest slimebag jerk offs that I despise of which no one on this blog has ever qualified as). The truth is I do mean well and hope everyone here gets the home they want without having to witness the collapse of our economy and the destruction of the lives of foolish/greedy but other good people.
sdr
September 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM #267200sdrealtorParticipantThanks sdduuuude,
That is exactly my point. There are too many poorly worded predictions and I dont want to see the “psuedo kreskins” of the blog return with see I was right comments about these broad statements. We all know the direction and have for years around hear. We make money in this world by beating the market not matching. That is the skill not posting a link to some article confirming your biases or making a broad statement that you will be able to find a data point that sorta supports it.Yeah Ren, sometimes I get a bit pissy and thats just me. Its how I get my points across in a crowded noisy blog. I do mean well and wish in my heart of hearts only the best for people (except the dishonest slimebag jerk offs that I despise of which no one on this blog has ever qualified as). The truth is I do mean well and hope everyone here gets the home they want without having to witness the collapse of our economy and the destruction of the lives of foolish/greedy but other good people.
sdr
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.