- This topic has 202 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 2, 2007 at 2:16 PM #107603December 2, 2007 at 2:33 PM #107458TheBreezeParticipant
Countrywide may have already off-loaded this loan to the Federal Government through one of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). The FHLBs have bought something like $200 billion of Countrywide loans in recent weeks. So its likely that the American taxpayer owns this loan and Countrywide is just the servicer. As the loan servicer, Countrywide probably doesn’t care what the interest rate is.
When Countrywide next reports earnings, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lot of their bad loans off-loaded to the FHLBs. This allows Countrywide to go on making bad loans while the American taxpayer foots the bill. God bless America and Angela Mozilla.
December 2, 2007 at 2:33 PM #107553TheBreezeParticipantCountrywide may have already off-loaded this loan to the Federal Government through one of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). The FHLBs have bought something like $200 billion of Countrywide loans in recent weeks. So its likely that the American taxpayer owns this loan and Countrywide is just the servicer. As the loan servicer, Countrywide probably doesn’t care what the interest rate is.
When Countrywide next reports earnings, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lot of their bad loans off-loaded to the FHLBs. This allows Countrywide to go on making bad loans while the American taxpayer foots the bill. God bless America and Angela Mozilla.
December 2, 2007 at 2:33 PM #107587TheBreezeParticipantCountrywide may have already off-loaded this loan to the Federal Government through one of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). The FHLBs have bought something like $200 billion of Countrywide loans in recent weeks. So its likely that the American taxpayer owns this loan and Countrywide is just the servicer. As the loan servicer, Countrywide probably doesn’t care what the interest rate is.
When Countrywide next reports earnings, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lot of their bad loans off-loaded to the FHLBs. This allows Countrywide to go on making bad loans while the American taxpayer foots the bill. God bless America and Angela Mozilla.
December 2, 2007 at 2:33 PM #107599TheBreezeParticipantCountrywide may have already off-loaded this loan to the Federal Government through one of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). The FHLBs have bought something like $200 billion of Countrywide loans in recent weeks. So its likely that the American taxpayer owns this loan and Countrywide is just the servicer. As the loan servicer, Countrywide probably doesn’t care what the interest rate is.
When Countrywide next reports earnings, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lot of their bad loans off-loaded to the FHLBs. This allows Countrywide to go on making bad loans while the American taxpayer foots the bill. God bless America and Angela Mozilla.
December 2, 2007 at 2:33 PM #107612TheBreezeParticipantCountrywide may have already off-loaded this loan to the Federal Government through one of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). The FHLBs have bought something like $200 billion of Countrywide loans in recent weeks. So its likely that the American taxpayer owns this loan and Countrywide is just the servicer. As the loan servicer, Countrywide probably doesn’t care what the interest rate is.
When Countrywide next reports earnings, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lot of their bad loans off-loaded to the FHLBs. This allows Countrywide to go on making bad loans while the American taxpayer foots the bill. God bless America and Angela Mozilla.
December 2, 2007 at 2:39 PM #107462AnonymousGuestGovernment always saves the best lobbyists out there (and by default this couple for the greater good, of the banks). Countrywide is smart, they keep the couple in at the inflated value letting them make all the repairs and maintenance while basically renting from the bank.
interest and prop tax: 2900 + 500 = 3400 at 65%, after tax, approximately = 2210 That’s no principal, utilities (killer) hoa or maintenance.
over 100K must mean 101K .
100/12 = 8333 gross – the tax deductible I & PT 3400 = 4933.
The rest (4933) is taxed at about an average of 41% (Fed CA, Fica and medicare). So 4,933 @ 41% = 2022 taxes.
8333 – 2022 = 6311 or 75732/year. 6311 – 3400 = 2911 or 34932/year to pay everything other than Home Interest and Property Taxes.
Their income gets cut in a third right away. But after a long day’s work they probably say, sheesh, we work so hard and make over 100K, don’t we surely deserve a little of this and that. Isn’t that how America works now.
Then they have to pay : Principal, Utilities, HOA, maintenance, insurance(car and home), car maint, med and dental, donations(no wonder giving is down) food, misc, E & R(not much probably) hopefully no car payment.
My only question is, why did couples keep taking the bait. Couldn’t they have let their friends go ahead and buy and forget it. But, watching every buyer brag about tripling their net worth must have been too hard to bear for these couples. Sadly, most people look at their own salary and think what they actually can afford isn’t good enough for them.
Don’t bite my head off, but on this list, I read the posters arguing about whether homes stink if they are 50 feet further from a lagoon in one of most expensive areas in the North county. How could anyone be reasonable today?
December 2, 2007 at 2:39 PM #107558AnonymousGuestGovernment always saves the best lobbyists out there (and by default this couple for the greater good, of the banks). Countrywide is smart, they keep the couple in at the inflated value letting them make all the repairs and maintenance while basically renting from the bank.
interest and prop tax: 2900 + 500 = 3400 at 65%, after tax, approximately = 2210 That’s no principal, utilities (killer) hoa or maintenance.
over 100K must mean 101K .
100/12 = 8333 gross – the tax deductible I & PT 3400 = 4933.
The rest (4933) is taxed at about an average of 41% (Fed CA, Fica and medicare). So 4,933 @ 41% = 2022 taxes.
8333 – 2022 = 6311 or 75732/year. 6311 – 3400 = 2911 or 34932/year to pay everything other than Home Interest and Property Taxes.
Their income gets cut in a third right away. But after a long day’s work they probably say, sheesh, we work so hard and make over 100K, don’t we surely deserve a little of this and that. Isn’t that how America works now.
Then they have to pay : Principal, Utilities, HOA, maintenance, insurance(car and home), car maint, med and dental, donations(no wonder giving is down) food, misc, E & R(not much probably) hopefully no car payment.
My only question is, why did couples keep taking the bait. Couldn’t they have let their friends go ahead and buy and forget it. But, watching every buyer brag about tripling their net worth must have been too hard to bear for these couples. Sadly, most people look at their own salary and think what they actually can afford isn’t good enough for them.
Don’t bite my head off, but on this list, I read the posters arguing about whether homes stink if they are 50 feet further from a lagoon in one of most expensive areas in the North county. How could anyone be reasonable today?
December 2, 2007 at 2:39 PM #107592AnonymousGuestGovernment always saves the best lobbyists out there (and by default this couple for the greater good, of the banks). Countrywide is smart, they keep the couple in at the inflated value letting them make all the repairs and maintenance while basically renting from the bank.
interest and prop tax: 2900 + 500 = 3400 at 65%, after tax, approximately = 2210 That’s no principal, utilities (killer) hoa or maintenance.
over 100K must mean 101K .
100/12 = 8333 gross – the tax deductible I & PT 3400 = 4933.
The rest (4933) is taxed at about an average of 41% (Fed CA, Fica and medicare). So 4,933 @ 41% = 2022 taxes.
8333 – 2022 = 6311 or 75732/year. 6311 – 3400 = 2911 or 34932/year to pay everything other than Home Interest and Property Taxes.
Their income gets cut in a third right away. But after a long day’s work they probably say, sheesh, we work so hard and make over 100K, don’t we surely deserve a little of this and that. Isn’t that how America works now.
Then they have to pay : Principal, Utilities, HOA, maintenance, insurance(car and home), car maint, med and dental, donations(no wonder giving is down) food, misc, E & R(not much probably) hopefully no car payment.
My only question is, why did couples keep taking the bait. Couldn’t they have let their friends go ahead and buy and forget it. But, watching every buyer brag about tripling their net worth must have been too hard to bear for these couples. Sadly, most people look at their own salary and think what they actually can afford isn’t good enough for them.
Don’t bite my head off, but on this list, I read the posters arguing about whether homes stink if they are 50 feet further from a lagoon in one of most expensive areas in the North county. How could anyone be reasonable today?
December 2, 2007 at 2:39 PM #107604AnonymousGuestGovernment always saves the best lobbyists out there (and by default this couple for the greater good, of the banks). Countrywide is smart, they keep the couple in at the inflated value letting them make all the repairs and maintenance while basically renting from the bank.
interest and prop tax: 2900 + 500 = 3400 at 65%, after tax, approximately = 2210 That’s no principal, utilities (killer) hoa or maintenance.
over 100K must mean 101K .
100/12 = 8333 gross – the tax deductible I & PT 3400 = 4933.
The rest (4933) is taxed at about an average of 41% (Fed CA, Fica and medicare). So 4,933 @ 41% = 2022 taxes.
8333 – 2022 = 6311 or 75732/year. 6311 – 3400 = 2911 or 34932/year to pay everything other than Home Interest and Property Taxes.
Their income gets cut in a third right away. But after a long day’s work they probably say, sheesh, we work so hard and make over 100K, don’t we surely deserve a little of this and that. Isn’t that how America works now.
Then they have to pay : Principal, Utilities, HOA, maintenance, insurance(car and home), car maint, med and dental, donations(no wonder giving is down) food, misc, E & R(not much probably) hopefully no car payment.
My only question is, why did couples keep taking the bait. Couldn’t they have let their friends go ahead and buy and forget it. But, watching every buyer brag about tripling their net worth must have been too hard to bear for these couples. Sadly, most people look at their own salary and think what they actually can afford isn’t good enough for them.
Don’t bite my head off, but on this list, I read the posters arguing about whether homes stink if they are 50 feet further from a lagoon in one of most expensive areas in the North county. How could anyone be reasonable today?
December 2, 2007 at 2:39 PM #107617AnonymousGuestGovernment always saves the best lobbyists out there (and by default this couple for the greater good, of the banks). Countrywide is smart, they keep the couple in at the inflated value letting them make all the repairs and maintenance while basically renting from the bank.
interest and prop tax: 2900 + 500 = 3400 at 65%, after tax, approximately = 2210 That’s no principal, utilities (killer) hoa or maintenance.
over 100K must mean 101K .
100/12 = 8333 gross – the tax deductible I & PT 3400 = 4933.
The rest (4933) is taxed at about an average of 41% (Fed CA, Fica and medicare). So 4,933 @ 41% = 2022 taxes.
8333 – 2022 = 6311 or 75732/year. 6311 – 3400 = 2911 or 34932/year to pay everything other than Home Interest and Property Taxes.
Their income gets cut in a third right away. But after a long day’s work they probably say, sheesh, we work so hard and make over 100K, don’t we surely deserve a little of this and that. Isn’t that how America works now.
Then they have to pay : Principal, Utilities, HOA, maintenance, insurance(car and home), car maint, med and dental, donations(no wonder giving is down) food, misc, E & R(not much probably) hopefully no car payment.
My only question is, why did couples keep taking the bait. Couldn’t they have let their friends go ahead and buy and forget it. But, watching every buyer brag about tripling their net worth must have been too hard to bear for these couples. Sadly, most people look at their own salary and think what they actually can afford isn’t good enough for them.
Don’t bite my head off, but on this list, I read the posters arguing about whether homes stink if they are 50 feet further from a lagoon in one of most expensive areas in the North county. How could anyone be reasonable today?
December 2, 2007 at 2:40 PM #107468sdnerdParticipantI’m not sure this is much of a win – they aren’t getting thrown own, but that might be what’s best for them.
Now their payments are going up, they are locked right back into another IO loan they (already) can’t afford at a slightly higher rate. They have no savings, 2 kids, and are relying on a single job. And even if their condo does happen to be worth what they originally paid for it 5 years from now, they haven’t paid down the mortgage.
I’m not familiar with Poway rents, but presumably you could rent something that *would work* for $1,600/mo if not less. The monthly savings alone could pay off some debt. Swap out the car payment for a cheap car. Have the wife at least get a part time job. They could salvage their situation, and be alright if they had the discipline and were willing to sacrifice.
Interesting.
December 2, 2007 at 2:40 PM #107563sdnerdParticipantI’m not sure this is much of a win – they aren’t getting thrown own, but that might be what’s best for them.
Now their payments are going up, they are locked right back into another IO loan they (already) can’t afford at a slightly higher rate. They have no savings, 2 kids, and are relying on a single job. And even if their condo does happen to be worth what they originally paid for it 5 years from now, they haven’t paid down the mortgage.
I’m not familiar with Poway rents, but presumably you could rent something that *would work* for $1,600/mo if not less. The monthly savings alone could pay off some debt. Swap out the car payment for a cheap car. Have the wife at least get a part time job. They could salvage their situation, and be alright if they had the discipline and were willing to sacrifice.
Interesting.
December 2, 2007 at 2:40 PM #107597sdnerdParticipantI’m not sure this is much of a win – they aren’t getting thrown own, but that might be what’s best for them.
Now their payments are going up, they are locked right back into another IO loan they (already) can’t afford at a slightly higher rate. They have no savings, 2 kids, and are relying on a single job. And even if their condo does happen to be worth what they originally paid for it 5 years from now, they haven’t paid down the mortgage.
I’m not familiar with Poway rents, but presumably you could rent something that *would work* for $1,600/mo if not less. The monthly savings alone could pay off some debt. Swap out the car payment for a cheap car. Have the wife at least get a part time job. They could salvage their situation, and be alright if they had the discipline and were willing to sacrifice.
Interesting.
December 2, 2007 at 2:40 PM #107609sdnerdParticipantI’m not sure this is much of a win – they aren’t getting thrown own, but that might be what’s best for them.
Now their payments are going up, they are locked right back into another IO loan they (already) can’t afford at a slightly higher rate. They have no savings, 2 kids, and are relying on a single job. And even if their condo does happen to be worth what they originally paid for it 5 years from now, they haven’t paid down the mortgage.
I’m not familiar with Poway rents, but presumably you could rent something that *would work* for $1,600/mo if not less. The monthly savings alone could pay off some debt. Swap out the car payment for a cheap car. Have the wife at least get a part time job. They could salvage their situation, and be alright if they had the discipline and were willing to sacrifice.
Interesting.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.