- This topic has 385 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by afx114.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 16, 2007 at 1:50 PM #118595December 16, 2007 at 2:32 PM #118376drunkleParticipant
what does this mean:
4. I am not a federal government contractor.
does this mean that if i work for a company with federal contracts, i’m not eligible to contribute? and what defines federal? just about every local government agency gets federal funds…
edit: nevermind, called the office for clarification.
December 16, 2007 at 2:32 PM #118508drunkleParticipantwhat does this mean:
4. I am not a federal government contractor.
does this mean that if i work for a company with federal contracts, i’m not eligible to contribute? and what defines federal? just about every local government agency gets federal funds…
edit: nevermind, called the office for clarification.
December 16, 2007 at 2:32 PM #118542drunkleParticipantwhat does this mean:
4. I am not a federal government contractor.
does this mean that if i work for a company with federal contracts, i’m not eligible to contribute? and what defines federal? just about every local government agency gets federal funds…
edit: nevermind, called the office for clarification.
December 16, 2007 at 2:32 PM #118582drunkleParticipantwhat does this mean:
4. I am not a federal government contractor.
does this mean that if i work for a company with federal contracts, i’m not eligible to contribute? and what defines federal? just about every local government agency gets federal funds…
edit: nevermind, called the office for clarification.
December 16, 2007 at 2:32 PM #118605drunkleParticipantwhat does this mean:
4. I am not a federal government contractor.
does this mean that if i work for a company with federal contracts, i’m not eligible to contribute? and what defines federal? just about every local government agency gets federal funds…
edit: nevermind, called the office for clarification.
December 16, 2007 at 3:11 PM #118386drunkleParticipanti’m pretty sure if ron paul wins, the stock market will implode.
if he wins and enacts his policies, oversight or elimination of the fed, elimination of subsidies, “fair” taxes and leveling of the playing field (via elimination of governmental favoritism), he’ll be targeted for termination.
the economy will probably suffer as his policies transition the country away from debt spending and big government. people will blame him for ruining the country and drop him like a used carter.
he’ll lay the foundation for prosperity under his successor who will be venerated like a doddering reagan.
December 16, 2007 at 3:11 PM #118520drunkleParticipanti’m pretty sure if ron paul wins, the stock market will implode.
if he wins and enacts his policies, oversight or elimination of the fed, elimination of subsidies, “fair” taxes and leveling of the playing field (via elimination of governmental favoritism), he’ll be targeted for termination.
the economy will probably suffer as his policies transition the country away from debt spending and big government. people will blame him for ruining the country and drop him like a used carter.
he’ll lay the foundation for prosperity under his successor who will be venerated like a doddering reagan.
December 16, 2007 at 3:11 PM #118552drunkleParticipanti’m pretty sure if ron paul wins, the stock market will implode.
if he wins and enacts his policies, oversight or elimination of the fed, elimination of subsidies, “fair” taxes and leveling of the playing field (via elimination of governmental favoritism), he’ll be targeted for termination.
the economy will probably suffer as his policies transition the country away from debt spending and big government. people will blame him for ruining the country and drop him like a used carter.
he’ll lay the foundation for prosperity under his successor who will be venerated like a doddering reagan.
December 16, 2007 at 3:11 PM #118593drunkleParticipanti’m pretty sure if ron paul wins, the stock market will implode.
if he wins and enacts his policies, oversight or elimination of the fed, elimination of subsidies, “fair” taxes and leveling of the playing field (via elimination of governmental favoritism), he’ll be targeted for termination.
the economy will probably suffer as his policies transition the country away from debt spending and big government. people will blame him for ruining the country and drop him like a used carter.
he’ll lay the foundation for prosperity under his successor who will be venerated like a doddering reagan.
December 16, 2007 at 3:11 PM #118613drunkleParticipanti’m pretty sure if ron paul wins, the stock market will implode.
if he wins and enacts his policies, oversight or elimination of the fed, elimination of subsidies, “fair” taxes and leveling of the playing field (via elimination of governmental favoritism), he’ll be targeted for termination.
the economy will probably suffer as his policies transition the country away from debt spending and big government. people will blame him for ruining the country and drop him like a used carter.
he’ll lay the foundation for prosperity under his successor who will be venerated like a doddering reagan.
December 16, 2007 at 3:33 PM #118391rseiserParticipantStopping the Fed printing money will certainly unleash the deflationary forces of credit contraction. Hence, some prices will fall. But since he will cut tons of wasted overseas spending, there will be more money available at home. All of his policies will lead to a stronger dollar. Again, this might not keep asset bubbles alive, but it will also be easier to keep interest rates lower, so at least we won’t have a 1970s experience.
December 16, 2007 at 3:33 PM #118524rseiserParticipantStopping the Fed printing money will certainly unleash the deflationary forces of credit contraction. Hence, some prices will fall. But since he will cut tons of wasted overseas spending, there will be more money available at home. All of his policies will lead to a stronger dollar. Again, this might not keep asset bubbles alive, but it will also be easier to keep interest rates lower, so at least we won’t have a 1970s experience.
December 16, 2007 at 3:33 PM #118557rseiserParticipantStopping the Fed printing money will certainly unleash the deflationary forces of credit contraction. Hence, some prices will fall. But since he will cut tons of wasted overseas spending, there will be more money available at home. All of his policies will lead to a stronger dollar. Again, this might not keep asset bubbles alive, but it will also be easier to keep interest rates lower, so at least we won’t have a 1970s experience.
December 16, 2007 at 3:33 PM #118598rseiserParticipantStopping the Fed printing money will certainly unleash the deflationary forces of credit contraction. Hence, some prices will fall. But since he will cut tons of wasted overseas spending, there will be more money available at home. All of his policies will lead to a stronger dollar. Again, this might not keep asset bubbles alive, but it will also be easier to keep interest rates lower, so at least we won’t have a 1970s experience.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.