Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Point Loma reducing a little
- This topic has 1,393 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM #687684April 13, 2011 at 7:15 PM #686520
sdrealtor
ParticipantJust to clarify the slipping in comment. This is exactly the behaviour you have abhorred for years and now you defend it? What gives?
Here is the history. The property was actually listed at $1.25M and the agent accepted an offer for 900K which is actually 350K below the asking price. That is a full 28% below the asking price. The agent then switched it to contingent and simultaneously lowered the price $120K (seemingly to cover his tracks). While working on the short sale approval, he could have lowered it $50K/week to see if there were buyers at a higher and possibly much higher price. Of course he didnt do that as it would have jeopardized the other half of the commission he was hoping for. Sorry but this reeks of big time shenanigans.
April 13, 2011 at 7:15 PM #686576sdrealtor
ParticipantJust to clarify the slipping in comment. This is exactly the behaviour you have abhorred for years and now you defend it? What gives?
Here is the history. The property was actually listed at $1.25M and the agent accepted an offer for 900K which is actually 350K below the asking price. That is a full 28% below the asking price. The agent then switched it to contingent and simultaneously lowered the price $120K (seemingly to cover his tracks). While working on the short sale approval, he could have lowered it $50K/week to see if there were buyers at a higher and possibly much higher price. Of course he didnt do that as it would have jeopardized the other half of the commission he was hoping for. Sorry but this reeks of big time shenanigans.
April 13, 2011 at 7:15 PM #687194sdrealtor
ParticipantJust to clarify the slipping in comment. This is exactly the behaviour you have abhorred for years and now you defend it? What gives?
Here is the history. The property was actually listed at $1.25M and the agent accepted an offer for 900K which is actually 350K below the asking price. That is a full 28% below the asking price. The agent then switched it to contingent and simultaneously lowered the price $120K (seemingly to cover his tracks). While working on the short sale approval, he could have lowered it $50K/week to see if there were buyers at a higher and possibly much higher price. Of course he didnt do that as it would have jeopardized the other half of the commission he was hoping for. Sorry but this reeks of big time shenanigans.
April 13, 2011 at 7:15 PM #687337sdrealtor
ParticipantJust to clarify the slipping in comment. This is exactly the behaviour you have abhorred for years and now you defend it? What gives?
Here is the history. The property was actually listed at $1.25M and the agent accepted an offer for 900K which is actually 350K below the asking price. That is a full 28% below the asking price. The agent then switched it to contingent and simultaneously lowered the price $120K (seemingly to cover his tracks). While working on the short sale approval, he could have lowered it $50K/week to see if there were buyers at a higher and possibly much higher price. Of course he didnt do that as it would have jeopardized the other half of the commission he was hoping for. Sorry but this reeks of big time shenanigans.
April 13, 2011 at 7:15 PM #687689sdrealtor
ParticipantJust to clarify the slipping in comment. This is exactly the behaviour you have abhorred for years and now you defend it? What gives?
Here is the history. The property was actually listed at $1.25M and the agent accepted an offer for 900K which is actually 350K below the asking price. That is a full 28% below the asking price. The agent then switched it to contingent and simultaneously lowered the price $120K (seemingly to cover his tracks). While working on the short sale approval, he could have lowered it $50K/week to see if there were buyers at a higher and possibly much higher price. Of course he didnt do that as it would have jeopardized the other half of the commission he was hoping for. Sorry but this reeks of big time shenanigans.
April 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM #686560jpinpb
ParticipantI abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.
April 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM #686616jpinpb
ParticipantI abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.
April 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM #687234jpinpb
ParticipantI abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.
April 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM #687377jpinpb
ParticipantI abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.
April 13, 2011 at 9:20 PM #687729jpinpb
ParticipantI abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.
April 13, 2011 at 11:49 PM #686605CA renter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]I abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.[/quote]
Exactly.
As long as all buyers have the same chance, then it’s a legitimate transaction. This is why all buyers should feel free to “lowball.” It’s the only way you’ll know whether or not something can sell for your price (which just might be “market price,” in the land of delusional sellers).
April 13, 2011 at 11:49 PM #686661CA renter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]I abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.[/quote]
Exactly.
As long as all buyers have the same chance, then it’s a legitimate transaction. This is why all buyers should feel free to “lowball.” It’s the only way you’ll know whether or not something can sell for your price (which just might be “market price,” in the land of delusional sellers).
April 13, 2011 at 11:49 PM #687280CA renter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]I abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.[/quote]
Exactly.
As long as all buyers have the same chance, then it’s a legitimate transaction. This is why all buyers should feel free to “lowball.” It’s the only way you’ll know whether or not something can sell for your price (which just might be “market price,” in the land of delusional sellers).
April 13, 2011 at 11:49 PM #687422CA renter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]I abhore when it’s an inside job and sells the day of list or before it’s even listed. If it’s on the market for a while and someone contacts the LA and makes an lowball offer that gets accepted, good for them.[/quote]
Exactly.
As long as all buyers have the same chance, then it’s a legitimate transaction. This is why all buyers should feel free to “lowball.” It’s the only way you’ll know whether or not something can sell for your price (which just might be “market price,” in the land of delusional sellers).
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
