Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Pentagon: Troops Overpaid
- This topic has 145 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM #548743May 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM #547783
SD Realtor
ParticipantI see it different. I have a few friends who have served and been called up. One of the tenants in a rental I have has served as well. I saw first hand the stress that the entire family had to endure during his deployments. Not cool at all. Makes localized public service jobs look like a joke. Makes union jobs look even sillier.
May 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM #547894SD Realtor
ParticipantI see it different. I have a few friends who have served and been called up. One of the tenants in a rental I have has served as well. I saw first hand the stress that the entire family had to endure during his deployments. Not cool at all. Makes localized public service jobs look like a joke. Makes union jobs look even sillier.
May 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM #548377SD Realtor
ParticipantI see it different. I have a few friends who have served and been called up. One of the tenants in a rental I have has served as well. I saw first hand the stress that the entire family had to endure during his deployments. Not cool at all. Makes localized public service jobs look like a joke. Makes union jobs look even sillier.
May 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM #548475SD Realtor
ParticipantI see it different. I have a few friends who have served and been called up. One of the tenants in a rental I have has served as well. I saw first hand the stress that the entire family had to endure during his deployments. Not cool at all. Makes localized public service jobs look like a joke. Makes union jobs look even sillier.
May 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM #548749SD Realtor
ParticipantI see it different. I have a few friends who have served and been called up. One of the tenants in a rental I have has served as well. I saw first hand the stress that the entire family had to endure during his deployments. Not cool at all. Makes localized public service jobs look like a joke. Makes union jobs look even sillier.
May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM #547793garysears
Participant“I see it different.”
Yes. Localized public service employees would not likely voluntarily deploy time after time for current pay. If you are going to use your military you need to pay it above general public service wages. Otherwise your troops will defect to the nondeploying public service jobs.
May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM #547904garysears
Participant“I see it different.”
Yes. Localized public service employees would not likely voluntarily deploy time after time for current pay. If you are going to use your military you need to pay it above general public service wages. Otherwise your troops will defect to the nondeploying public service jobs.
May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM #548387garysears
Participant“I see it different.”
Yes. Localized public service employees would not likely voluntarily deploy time after time for current pay. If you are going to use your military you need to pay it above general public service wages. Otherwise your troops will defect to the nondeploying public service jobs.
May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM #548485garysears
Participant“I see it different.”
Yes. Localized public service employees would not likely voluntarily deploy time after time for current pay. If you are going to use your military you need to pay it above general public service wages. Otherwise your troops will defect to the nondeploying public service jobs.
May 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM #548758garysears
Participant“I see it different.”
Yes. Localized public service employees would not likely voluntarily deploy time after time for current pay. If you are going to use your military you need to pay it above general public service wages. Otherwise your troops will defect to the nondeploying public service jobs.
May 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM #547808poorgradstudent
ParticipantYour typical enlisted grunt in the military is arguably underpaid. Your typical officer could be making as much or more money in the private sector. The US military is far from immune to the laws of supply and demand and labor economics. A decade of war has changed the math for enlisting in the reserves; when I was in high school and college there was a chance reservists would be deployed. Following the Iraq invasion, it’s pretty much guaranteed.
The areas they might be able to cut costs would be hazard pay and civilian contractors. I know of plenty of cases where someone leaves the military and basically gets rehired to do the same job as a contractor for way more money. But military contracts tend to be very political things with a lot of pork involved. Can you imagine a San Diego representative arguing that we need to scale back military spending?
A true fiscal conservative might argue the solution is to end our occupation of Iraq, along with closing outdated bases in Germany and Japan, and potentially other countries. Scale back demand for soldiers and you’ll have the double benefit of not having to pay quite as much and being able to have a higher average overall quality.
May 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM #547919poorgradstudent
ParticipantYour typical enlisted grunt in the military is arguably underpaid. Your typical officer could be making as much or more money in the private sector. The US military is far from immune to the laws of supply and demand and labor economics. A decade of war has changed the math for enlisting in the reserves; when I was in high school and college there was a chance reservists would be deployed. Following the Iraq invasion, it’s pretty much guaranteed.
The areas they might be able to cut costs would be hazard pay and civilian contractors. I know of plenty of cases where someone leaves the military and basically gets rehired to do the same job as a contractor for way more money. But military contracts tend to be very political things with a lot of pork involved. Can you imagine a San Diego representative arguing that we need to scale back military spending?
A true fiscal conservative might argue the solution is to end our occupation of Iraq, along with closing outdated bases in Germany and Japan, and potentially other countries. Scale back demand for soldiers and you’ll have the double benefit of not having to pay quite as much and being able to have a higher average overall quality.
May 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM #548403poorgradstudent
ParticipantYour typical enlisted grunt in the military is arguably underpaid. Your typical officer could be making as much or more money in the private sector. The US military is far from immune to the laws of supply and demand and labor economics. A decade of war has changed the math for enlisting in the reserves; when I was in high school and college there was a chance reservists would be deployed. Following the Iraq invasion, it’s pretty much guaranteed.
The areas they might be able to cut costs would be hazard pay and civilian contractors. I know of plenty of cases where someone leaves the military and basically gets rehired to do the same job as a contractor for way more money. But military contracts tend to be very political things with a lot of pork involved. Can you imagine a San Diego representative arguing that we need to scale back military spending?
A true fiscal conservative might argue the solution is to end our occupation of Iraq, along with closing outdated bases in Germany and Japan, and potentially other countries. Scale back demand for soldiers and you’ll have the double benefit of not having to pay quite as much and being able to have a higher average overall quality.
May 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM #548500poorgradstudent
ParticipantYour typical enlisted grunt in the military is arguably underpaid. Your typical officer could be making as much or more money in the private sector. The US military is far from immune to the laws of supply and demand and labor economics. A decade of war has changed the math for enlisting in the reserves; when I was in high school and college there was a chance reservists would be deployed. Following the Iraq invasion, it’s pretty much guaranteed.
The areas they might be able to cut costs would be hazard pay and civilian contractors. I know of plenty of cases where someone leaves the military and basically gets rehired to do the same job as a contractor for way more money. But military contracts tend to be very political things with a lot of pork involved. Can you imagine a San Diego representative arguing that we need to scale back military spending?
A true fiscal conservative might argue the solution is to end our occupation of Iraq, along with closing outdated bases in Germany and Japan, and potentially other countries. Scale back demand for soldiers and you’ll have the double benefit of not having to pay quite as much and being able to have a higher average overall quality.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.