- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by RB132.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM #16052July 17, 2009 at 6:21 PM #4330625yearwaiterParticipant
This is really a good article and mentioned about several pit-falls in our current housing settlements done by Fed but still several issues remained there. Eventually one item caught my attention is overpriced homes. Did Fed think this angle any issue to resolve?, perhaps not. Had Fed really consider this kind of issue during their bailout and all such schems while fixing then really we would be expecting a clean and slow growth in housing future. I vote fully for this article and these are the facts(real fears), one can guess there may be several collapses in our current housing model several times in the future and perhaps people those who bought homes before 2002 may get some good yields but not after that buyers in any long term ……
July 17, 2009 at 6:21 PM #4338055yearwaiterParticipantThis is really a good article and mentioned about several pit-falls in our current housing settlements done by Fed but still several issues remained there. Eventually one item caught my attention is overpriced homes. Did Fed think this angle any issue to resolve?, perhaps not. Had Fed really consider this kind of issue during their bailout and all such schems while fixing then really we would be expecting a clean and slow growth in housing future. I vote fully for this article and these are the facts(real fears), one can guess there may be several collapses in our current housing model several times in the future and perhaps people those who bought homes before 2002 may get some good yields but not after that buyers in any long term ……
July 17, 2009 at 6:21 PM #4332745yearwaiterParticipantThis is really a good article and mentioned about several pit-falls in our current housing settlements done by Fed but still several issues remained there. Eventually one item caught my attention is overpriced homes. Did Fed think this angle any issue to resolve?, perhaps not. Had Fed really consider this kind of issue during their bailout and all such schems while fixing then really we would be expecting a clean and slow growth in housing future. I vote fully for this article and these are the facts(real fears), one can guess there may be several collapses in our current housing model several times in the future and perhaps people those who bought homes before 2002 may get some good yields but not after that buyers in any long term ……
July 17, 2009 at 6:21 PM #4336425yearwaiterParticipantThis is really a good article and mentioned about several pit-falls in our current housing settlements done by Fed but still several issues remained there. Eventually one item caught my attention is overpriced homes. Did Fed think this angle any issue to resolve?, perhaps not. Had Fed really consider this kind of issue during their bailout and all such schems while fixing then really we would be expecting a clean and slow growth in housing future. I vote fully for this article and these are the facts(real fears), one can guess there may be several collapses in our current housing model several times in the future and perhaps people those who bought homes before 2002 may get some good yields but not after that buyers in any long term ……
July 17, 2009 at 6:21 PM #4335705yearwaiterParticipantThis is really a good article and mentioned about several pit-falls in our current housing settlements done by Fed but still several issues remained there. Eventually one item caught my attention is overpriced homes. Did Fed think this angle any issue to resolve?, perhaps not. Had Fed really consider this kind of issue during their bailout and all such schems while fixing then really we would be expecting a clean and slow growth in housing future. I vote fully for this article and these are the facts(real fears), one can guess there may be several collapses in our current housing model several times in the future and perhaps people those who bought homes before 2002 may get some good yields but not after that buyers in any long term ……
July 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #433630SandraLParticipantCase for the lower end staying about where it is now: the low end is selling, which means that there are willing buyers at this price. This would lead one to figure that the market has said “yes” to this price point. As long as there are first time buyers who qualify and say “yes” to this price level, it will likely stick or raise. The jump from a $200k home to a $400k home is too steep for a first time buyer, so it makes sense that the low end has achieved price discovery.
That’s my opinion, I could be wrong.
July 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #433863SandraLParticipantCase for the lower end staying about where it is now: the low end is selling, which means that there are willing buyers at this price. This would lead one to figure that the market has said “yes” to this price point. As long as there are first time buyers who qualify and say “yes” to this price level, it will likely stick or raise. The jump from a $200k home to a $400k home is too steep for a first time buyer, so it makes sense that the low end has achieved price discovery.
That’s my opinion, I could be wrong.
July 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #433701SandraLParticipantCase for the lower end staying about where it is now: the low end is selling, which means that there are willing buyers at this price. This would lead one to figure that the market has said “yes” to this price point. As long as there are first time buyers who qualify and say “yes” to this price level, it will likely stick or raise. The jump from a $200k home to a $400k home is too steep for a first time buyer, so it makes sense that the low end has achieved price discovery.
That’s my opinion, I could be wrong.
July 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #433331SandraLParticipantCase for the lower end staying about where it is now: the low end is selling, which means that there are willing buyers at this price. This would lead one to figure that the market has said “yes” to this price point. As long as there are first time buyers who qualify and say “yes” to this price level, it will likely stick or raise. The jump from a $200k home to a $400k home is too steep for a first time buyer, so it makes sense that the low end has achieved price discovery.
That’s my opinion, I could be wrong.
July 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM #433121SandraLParticipantCase for the lower end staying about where it is now: the low end is selling, which means that there are willing buyers at this price. This would lead one to figure that the market has said “yes” to this price point. As long as there are first time buyers who qualify and say “yes” to this price level, it will likely stick or raise. The jump from a $200k home to a $400k home is too steep for a first time buyer, so it makes sense that the low end has achieved price discovery.
That’s my opinion, I could be wrong.
July 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM #433340patientrenterParticipantWhat happens at either end depends entirely on how much money the govt pumps in. Right now, trillions are being pumped into the low end. Will that be extended to the high end? Maybe. Will it be withdrawn from the low end? Fat chance.
July 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM #433640patientrenterParticipantWhat happens at either end depends entirely on how much money the govt pumps in. Right now, trillions are being pumped into the low end. Will that be extended to the high end? Maybe. Will it be withdrawn from the low end? Fat chance.
July 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM #433711patientrenterParticipantWhat happens at either end depends entirely on how much money the govt pumps in. Right now, trillions are being pumped into the low end. Will that be extended to the high end? Maybe. Will it be withdrawn from the low end? Fat chance.
July 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM #433131patientrenterParticipantWhat happens at either end depends entirely on how much money the govt pumps in. Right now, trillions are being pumped into the low end. Will that be extended to the high end? Maybe. Will it be withdrawn from the low end? Fat chance.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.