- This topic has 100 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 1, 2010 at 9:53 PM #586324August 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM #585292sdrealtorParticipant
Checked Carmel Valley and the stats dont look any better if i only go up to $1M. The market is actually stronger between 1 and 1.25M. Pendings look much better than sales so either it s getting stronger or there are a higher percentage of fall outs.
Solana Beach and Cardiff are thinly traded markets. Hard to take away much.
Encinitas has well under 2 months supply when you consider contingents and pendings (86 vs 56). Market is chugging along with actives at 3 times monthly sales.
South Carlsbad has about 2 months supply when you consider continegnets and pendings. Closer to 4 months when you consider actives vs monthlys sales.
If you look at just the portion of South Carlsbad in the San Dieguito school district most of the continegent short sales disappear.
All in all, the market looks a bit weaker than it did in early Spring but still pretty strong and stabilized.
Overall there should be some opportunities over the next few months but once we get back to Febuary the market should Spring back to life. I forsee a pretty stagnant/stable market over the next 6 months with little or no price depreciation.
August 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM #585385sdrealtorParticipantChecked Carmel Valley and the stats dont look any better if i only go up to $1M. The market is actually stronger between 1 and 1.25M. Pendings look much better than sales so either it s getting stronger or there are a higher percentage of fall outs.
Solana Beach and Cardiff are thinly traded markets. Hard to take away much.
Encinitas has well under 2 months supply when you consider contingents and pendings (86 vs 56). Market is chugging along with actives at 3 times monthly sales.
South Carlsbad has about 2 months supply when you consider continegnets and pendings. Closer to 4 months when you consider actives vs monthlys sales.
If you look at just the portion of South Carlsbad in the San Dieguito school district most of the continegent short sales disappear.
All in all, the market looks a bit weaker than it did in early Spring but still pretty strong and stabilized.
Overall there should be some opportunities over the next few months but once we get back to Febuary the market should Spring back to life. I forsee a pretty stagnant/stable market over the next 6 months with little or no price depreciation.
August 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM #585918sdrealtorParticipantChecked Carmel Valley and the stats dont look any better if i only go up to $1M. The market is actually stronger between 1 and 1.25M. Pendings look much better than sales so either it s getting stronger or there are a higher percentage of fall outs.
Solana Beach and Cardiff are thinly traded markets. Hard to take away much.
Encinitas has well under 2 months supply when you consider contingents and pendings (86 vs 56). Market is chugging along with actives at 3 times monthly sales.
South Carlsbad has about 2 months supply when you consider continegnets and pendings. Closer to 4 months when you consider actives vs monthlys sales.
If you look at just the portion of South Carlsbad in the San Dieguito school district most of the continegent short sales disappear.
All in all, the market looks a bit weaker than it did in early Spring but still pretty strong and stabilized.
Overall there should be some opportunities over the next few months but once we get back to Febuary the market should Spring back to life. I forsee a pretty stagnant/stable market over the next 6 months with little or no price depreciation.
August 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM #586026sdrealtorParticipantChecked Carmel Valley and the stats dont look any better if i only go up to $1M. The market is actually stronger between 1 and 1.25M. Pendings look much better than sales so either it s getting stronger or there are a higher percentage of fall outs.
Solana Beach and Cardiff are thinly traded markets. Hard to take away much.
Encinitas has well under 2 months supply when you consider contingents and pendings (86 vs 56). Market is chugging along with actives at 3 times monthly sales.
South Carlsbad has about 2 months supply when you consider continegnets and pendings. Closer to 4 months when you consider actives vs monthlys sales.
If you look at just the portion of South Carlsbad in the San Dieguito school district most of the continegent short sales disappear.
All in all, the market looks a bit weaker than it did in early Spring but still pretty strong and stabilized.
Overall there should be some opportunities over the next few months but once we get back to Febuary the market should Spring back to life. I forsee a pretty stagnant/stable market over the next 6 months with little or no price depreciation.
August 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM #586329sdrealtorParticipantChecked Carmel Valley and the stats dont look any better if i only go up to $1M. The market is actually stronger between 1 and 1.25M. Pendings look much better than sales so either it s getting stronger or there are a higher percentage of fall outs.
Solana Beach and Cardiff are thinly traded markets. Hard to take away much.
Encinitas has well under 2 months supply when you consider contingents and pendings (86 vs 56). Market is chugging along with actives at 3 times monthly sales.
South Carlsbad has about 2 months supply when you consider continegnets and pendings. Closer to 4 months when you consider actives vs monthlys sales.
If you look at just the portion of South Carlsbad in the San Dieguito school district most of the continegent short sales disappear.
All in all, the market looks a bit weaker than it did in early Spring but still pretty strong and stabilized.
Overall there should be some opportunities over the next few months but once we get back to Febuary the market should Spring back to life. I forsee a pretty stagnant/stable market over the next 6 months with little or no price depreciation.
August 1, 2010 at 10:39 PM #585302sdrealtorParticipantSD R, I posted actual actives, continegents and pendings. For monthly sales, I divided the last 90 days of closings by 3. I used a max of $1M except for CV where I went up to 1.25M. Depending upon the zips you are looking at you may want to limit pricing also because that can skew what is really going on. For example if I was looking at 92117 in Clairemont there are listngs above 600K but those really have very little to do with the overall market there which pretty much shuts down around 550K with the exception of Bay Ho/Bay Park.
August 1, 2010 at 10:39 PM #585395sdrealtorParticipantSD R, I posted actual actives, continegents and pendings. For monthly sales, I divided the last 90 days of closings by 3. I used a max of $1M except for CV where I went up to 1.25M. Depending upon the zips you are looking at you may want to limit pricing also because that can skew what is really going on. For example if I was looking at 92117 in Clairemont there are listngs above 600K but those really have very little to do with the overall market there which pretty much shuts down around 550K with the exception of Bay Ho/Bay Park.
August 1, 2010 at 10:39 PM #585929sdrealtorParticipantSD R, I posted actual actives, continegents and pendings. For monthly sales, I divided the last 90 days of closings by 3. I used a max of $1M except for CV where I went up to 1.25M. Depending upon the zips you are looking at you may want to limit pricing also because that can skew what is really going on. For example if I was looking at 92117 in Clairemont there are listngs above 600K but those really have very little to do with the overall market there which pretty much shuts down around 550K with the exception of Bay Ho/Bay Park.
August 1, 2010 at 10:39 PM #586036sdrealtorParticipantSD R, I posted actual actives, continegents and pendings. For monthly sales, I divided the last 90 days of closings by 3. I used a max of $1M except for CV where I went up to 1.25M. Depending upon the zips you are looking at you may want to limit pricing also because that can skew what is really going on. For example if I was looking at 92117 in Clairemont there are listngs above 600K but those really have very little to do with the overall market there which pretty much shuts down around 550K with the exception of Bay Ho/Bay Park.
August 1, 2010 at 10:39 PM #586339sdrealtorParticipantSD R, I posted actual actives, continegents and pendings. For monthly sales, I divided the last 90 days of closings by 3. I used a max of $1M except for CV where I went up to 1.25M. Depending upon the zips you are looking at you may want to limit pricing also because that can skew what is really going on. For example if I was looking at 92117 in Clairemont there are listngs above 600K but those really have very little to do with the overall market there which pretty much shuts down around 550K with the exception of Bay Ho/Bay Park.
August 1, 2010 at 10:48 PM #585317rahulParticipantWould be great if we could get such numbers for the NC-inland. Rancho Bernardo, RP, Poway, Scripps Ranch. I doubt it will look as good as it does for NCC.
August 1, 2010 at 10:48 PM #585410rahulParticipantWould be great if we could get such numbers for the NC-inland. Rancho Bernardo, RP, Poway, Scripps Ranch. I doubt it will look as good as it does for NCC.
August 1, 2010 at 10:48 PM #585944rahulParticipantWould be great if we could get such numbers for the NC-inland. Rancho Bernardo, RP, Poway, Scripps Ranch. I doubt it will look as good as it does for NCC.
August 1, 2010 at 10:48 PM #586051rahulParticipantWould be great if we could get such numbers for the NC-inland. Rancho Bernardo, RP, Poway, Scripps Ranch. I doubt it will look as good as it does for NCC.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.