Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Pacific Highland Ranch vs. 4S Ranch
- This topic has 13 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 8 months ago by DaCounselor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 5, 2012 at 10:05 PM #19485February 6, 2012 at 5:45 PM #737450paranoidParticipant
why do you think PHR has better schools than 4S?
February 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM #7374584sliveParticipantlook at this thread. http://piggington.com/2011_api_scores_are_out
February 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM #738330earlyretirementParticipantWe looked at a few houses in PHR as well last year. They had some nice houses but to be honest, for the most part, the houses were piled on top of one another with NO privacy at all. Yeah, there were a few streets that weren’t as bad or corner lot houses that were better. But MANY houses had absolutely NO privacy at all with some as many as 5 houses immediately looking into the tiny back yards.
Schools: The schools are great in both locations. I wouldn’t get too caught up in API scores to judge school districts. I think most parents would agree both school districts are great relatively speaking compared to other districts in San Diego.
Mello Roos: I agree Mello Roos sucks no matter which area you’re in. We bought in nearby Santaluz and it’s not fun paying $5,500+ a year in Mello Roos taxes. However, I feel like once you bite the bullet to live in a MR area, there isn’t much you can do about it. You can complain but who will listen??
Parks: I agree with the lack of parks in the PHR area. Yeah, 4SR was better but we didn’t find anything to write home about in way of parks in 4S Ranch. But yes, if this is important 4S Ranch has the nod here.
Weather: We were renting a townhouse in Carmel Valley while we were waiting to move into our house. I found the difference in weather VERY negligible between Carmel Valley and the Santaluz area. Maybe a slight difference. However, we noticed the biggest difference once we passed I-15 but the difference is very little between the PHR area and where we live. But past I-15 for some reason it can drastically vary. For example a few weeks ago, I was meeting a friend for lunch. My car said it was 71 degrees at Santaluz but when I went to lunch at Brigintine’s in Poway it was 79 degrees!
Lot sizes: I totally agree PHR had super tiny lots for the most part. I’m not one of these people that need some huge yard. For us, an 8,000 sq. foot lot is plenty for us. To us, it’s not so much lot size but the way it’s utilized to provide privacy from neighbors and much of PHR was horrible.
Shopping: This wasn’t too high on the priority list for us at all. True PHR doesn’t have anything really to speak of in the area. However, although we don’t live too far from the 4S Ranch town center area …we’ve almost never been to that shopping area. I don’t think in the grand scheme of things shopping is too great there relatively speaking either.
I think both general areas are really great compared to many other areas. Most people that choose to live in the area are doing so I think for school district reasons.
We really LOVE living in the area. The quality of life is excellent for us. We couldn’t be more pleased with the area, the schools and just general high quality of life conditions.
To answer your question, I didn’t find the premium worth it price per sq. foot for PHR vs. other areas. In fact, quite the opposite. I couldn’t understand the desire for many people to pay so much for those houses.
February 20, 2012 at 12:08 AM #7383424sliveParticipant[quote=earlyretirement]We bought in nearby Santaluz and it’s not fun paying $5,500+ a year in Mello Roos taxes. .[/quote]
The entire 92127 zip code is high MR area, so I have confidence that the schools will be well supported by MR money, so the school will be better and better although they are new now. One fundenmental reason for good schools in 92130 is the high property tax and thus good funding to schools.
Wrt. $5,500 MR/year. Have you considered to pay it off? I guess the pre-payment amound is ~$60K. If you want to stay in the home for > 5 years, then it might be a wise decision.
February 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM #738350earlyretirementParticipantI agree most of 92127 zip code has higher MR taxes. I’m reasonably confident the schools in this school district will continue to do well over the long-term.
I might consider paying off the MR taxes. We will definitely be in the home for the long haul. Our kids are young and we plan to live in the house until they finish high school. Our youngest is 2 years old so needless to say we have a long while to go!
I don’t feel too much pressure on the MR fees. I think most buying in this area aren’t broken one way or the other by MR fees. Yes, it sucks paying it but it’s not going to make or break me. I personally feel it’s still worth paying the MR fees to live where we do. Others may disagree. I think it’s a very personal decision.
Someone PM’ed me a while ago that was looking in the Santaluz development that they called to check on the pay off amounts for the Mello Roos taxes.
I hope they don’t mind I’m posting it below as I find it’s very educational and will benefit others. (Here is what they wrote below in quotes between the lines).
_________________________________________
“The other thing is I just called and talked directly with the city tax assessors and companies managing the mello roos. FYI, the CFD#2 which is the main one is on a 30 years bond which started in 2000 and ends 2030.
To calculate the pay off amount on your property will cost $500. The CFD#4 which is the Poway Unified is on a 40 years bond. They charge $100 to calculate the pay off amount, but will deduct it from your actual pay off if you choose to do so.
Since you are planning to live there for a while, you may want to consider paying off the CFD#2. Here are their numbers if you are interested in the actual calculation for your parcel.
CFD #2: 949.955.1500
CFD#4: 877.250.1503 or direct 949.250.8300(picked up # when they called me back.)
I did the math, it’s worth while to pay off the CFD#2 but not #4. But of course you can do your own calculations.”_______________________________________
I have been busy so I haven’t bothered yet to do this. Plus wasn’t excited about paying $500 to get the pay-off amount. But I will probably end up doing this as we plan to be in the house for the long haul.
February 20, 2012 at 11:57 AM #7383524sliveParticipant[quote=earlyretirement]I have been busy so I haven’t bothered yet to do this. Plus wasn’t excited about paying $500 to get the pay-off amount. But I will probably end up doing this as we plan to be in the house for the long haul.[/quote]
Here are the pros I summarized to pay off MR, just my 2 cents:
1) With such low 30-year fixed mortgate interest rate (~4%), it becomes more and more reasonable to pay off MR because MR annual payment is equvilent to 8-9% interest rate. In another words, borrowing some cheap money to pay off high cost MR is financially wise now;
2) The mortgage rate is locked for no change in 30 years while MR payment will be going up 2% (?) every year for 30-40 year. So given same amount of principle, the lifetime payment for MR is much more than mortgate payment;
3) Theoretically MR is not tax deductible, even it’s gray area on tax return now, but with many high income families in 92127, the AMT will kill the tax deductible advantage of MR;February 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM #738354DaCounselorParticipantPHR is a good example of dangers associated with being an early settlor in a planned community. Eight years or so from the first homes going up and still no parks, no shopping and no schools? Eight years!
I think they are getting closer to putting a shopping center up on the corner of DM Heights Rd and CV Rd, but I understand there is still some serious debate on the subject. Nothing is coming easy for PHR…
I doubt there will ever be any new housing stock on decent lot sizes in PHR as the entire concept is for a pedestrian friendly community with small lots and a villagey feel.
I would much prefer the older housing stock in CV than PHR for about the same price. Way too many question marks in PHR’s future. They may ultimately get everything figured out and built out, but by that time the early settlors’ kids will be off to college…It may end up fulfilling its promise but if and when is the question and you really won’t know how the area will feel until it’s built out.
February 20, 2012 at 3:29 PM #738357mp7444Participant[quote=4slive]because MR annual payment is equvilent to 8-9% interest rate.[/quote]
Could you shed some lights on how to is this number calculated?
I’m thinking about paying off the MR as well. MR & property tax together are like 1k/mo. :/
February 20, 2012 at 3:48 PM #7383594sliveParticipant[quote=mp7444][quote=4slive]because MR annual payment is equvilent to 8-9% interest rate.[/quote]
Could you shed some lights on how to is this number calculated?
I’m thinking about paying off the MR as well. MR & property tax together are like 1k/mo. :/[/quote]
Contact PUSD or county to get your MR pay off amount, assume it’s the principle, then plug in the number to 30-year fixed mortgage calculator, you should be able to figure out the equivelant interest rate for same monthly payment. To give you some ideas, the MR pay off amount is usually 10 times of your annual payment.
February 20, 2012 at 3:59 PM #738361mp7444Participant[quote=4slive]Contact PUSD or county to get your MR pay off amount, assume it’s the principle, then plug in the number to 30-year fixed mortgage calculator, you should be able to figure out the equivelant interest rate for same monthly payment. To give you some ideas, the MR pay off amount is usually 10 times of your annual payment.[/quote]
thanks 4slive.
February 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM #7383604sliveParticipant[quote=DaCounselor]PHR is a good example of dangers associated with being an early settlor in a planned community. Eight years or so from the first homes going up and still no parks, no shopping and no schools? Eight years!
I think they are getting closer to putting a shopping center up on the corner of DM Heights Rd and CV Rd, but I understand there is still some serious debate on the subject. Nothing is coming easy for PHR…
I doubt there will ever be any new housing stock on decent lot sizes in PHR as the entire concept is for a pedestrian friendly community with small lots and a villagey feel.
I would much prefer the older housing stock in CV than PHR for about the same price. Way too many question marks in PHR’s future. They may ultimately get everything figured out and built out, but by that time the early settlors’ kids will be off to college…It may end up fulfilling its promise but if and when is the question and you really won’t know how the area will feel until it’s built out.[/quote]
Is that because Pardee home too greedy? Just want to build home to generate revenue instead of rewarding the community for parks, schools and shopping center.
February 29, 2012 at 10:55 PM #739001enron_by_the_seaParticipantUpdate on PHR facilities.
[Quote]
Board member Manjeet Ranu, who represents PHR, said, “This will allow us to get things that make a community a real community and help surrounding communities by not burdening their facilities.”Frank January, from the city of San Diego, said the transportation and phasing plan includes all of the population-based facilities funded by Facilities Benefit Assessments (FBA) paid by homeowners. These include the neighborhood and community parks, the library, trail systems and a community pool in Black Mountain Ranch.
The phasing plan includes threshold requirements.
“Within the thresholds, development cannot proceed until those facilities are provided,” January said.
That means no more new houses until there are appropriate amenities for the residents that currently live there. January also said the amended financing plan aims to minimize delays as much as possible.
Gonzalez Canyon Neighborhood Park will be the first to be designed and delivered as PHR reaches its first threshold of 1,900 units. January said they have a signed agreement from Pardee Homes as of last week to move forward with reimbursements to design and build that park.
[/Quote]March 1, 2012 at 9:49 AM #739025DaCounselorParticipantGood find enron, thanks. I wonder if they will build that park if the City won’t commit to maintenance after the first two years of Pardee’s maintenance are over.
The revised plan also extends the development period by 14 years, to 2035. Not surprising given the circumstances but wow, what a difference than what was initially anticipated. I hope for the sake of the people in PHR as well as the neighboring areas they get things figured out over there, but excuse me if I am not optimistic of any quick improvements to the situation. Too bad.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.