Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Fed in bold move to thaw credit markets says it will buy massive amounts of short-term debt
- This topic has 212 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 6, 2008 at 8:05 AM #282237October 6, 2008 at 8:11 AM #281906CoronitaParticipant
[quote=alarmclock]Better make sure those circuit breakers are all ready.
http://www.nyse.com/press/circuit_breakers.htmlCan someone explain why, a priori, the “Federal Reserve” would be so concerned with the goings on in the “Stock Market”? I mean: if you were setting up a brand new nation, would you expect the former to be so interested int the latter?[/quote]
not gonna happen (yet) me thinks…Fed still can cut rates to 0% π After that, all bets are off. I wouldn’t be surprised if we end today back in green on a whisper or rumor..
Don’t play this game if you’re not going to acknowledge might end up losing it all.
October 6, 2008 at 8:11 AM #282184CoronitaParticipant[quote=alarmclock]Better make sure those circuit breakers are all ready.
http://www.nyse.com/press/circuit_breakers.htmlCan someone explain why, a priori, the “Federal Reserve” would be so concerned with the goings on in the “Stock Market”? I mean: if you were setting up a brand new nation, would you expect the former to be so interested int the latter?[/quote]
not gonna happen (yet) me thinks…Fed still can cut rates to 0% π After that, all bets are off. I wouldn’t be surprised if we end today back in green on a whisper or rumor..
Don’t play this game if you’re not going to acknowledge might end up losing it all.
October 6, 2008 at 8:11 AM #282188CoronitaParticipant[quote=alarmclock]Better make sure those circuit breakers are all ready.
http://www.nyse.com/press/circuit_breakers.htmlCan someone explain why, a priori, the “Federal Reserve” would be so concerned with the goings on in the “Stock Market”? I mean: if you were setting up a brand new nation, would you expect the former to be so interested int the latter?[/quote]
not gonna happen (yet) me thinks…Fed still can cut rates to 0% π After that, all bets are off. I wouldn’t be surprised if we end today back in green on a whisper or rumor..
Don’t play this game if you’re not going to acknowledge might end up losing it all.
October 6, 2008 at 8:11 AM #282231CoronitaParticipant[quote=alarmclock]Better make sure those circuit breakers are all ready.
http://www.nyse.com/press/circuit_breakers.htmlCan someone explain why, a priori, the “Federal Reserve” would be so concerned with the goings on in the “Stock Market”? I mean: if you were setting up a brand new nation, would you expect the former to be so interested int the latter?[/quote]
not gonna happen (yet) me thinks…Fed still can cut rates to 0% π After that, all bets are off. I wouldn’t be surprised if we end today back in green on a whisper or rumor..
Don’t play this game if you’re not going to acknowledge might end up losing it all.
October 6, 2008 at 8:11 AM #282242CoronitaParticipant[quote=alarmclock]Better make sure those circuit breakers are all ready.
http://www.nyse.com/press/circuit_breakers.htmlCan someone explain why, a priori, the “Federal Reserve” would be so concerned with the goings on in the “Stock Market”? I mean: if you were setting up a brand new nation, would you expect the former to be so interested int the latter?[/quote]
not gonna happen (yet) me thinks…Fed still can cut rates to 0% π After that, all bets are off. I wouldn’t be surprised if we end today back in green on a whisper or rumor..
Don’t play this game if you’re not going to acknowledge might end up losing it all.
October 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM #281911bsrsharmaParticipantCramer just advised on NBC to sell if you need funds within next 5 years. He expects market to drop 20%. (DOW 8000).
October 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM #282189bsrsharmaParticipantCramer just advised on NBC to sell if you need funds within next 5 years. He expects market to drop 20%. (DOW 8000).
October 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM #282193bsrsharmaParticipantCramer just advised on NBC to sell if you need funds within next 5 years. He expects market to drop 20%. (DOW 8000).
October 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM #282236bsrsharmaParticipantCramer just advised on NBC to sell if you need funds within next 5 years. He expects market to drop 20%. (DOW 8000).
October 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM #282247bsrsharmaParticipantCramer just advised on NBC to sell if you need funds within next 5 years. He expects market to drop 20%. (DOW 8000).
October 6, 2008 at 8:21 AM #281916ArrayaParticipantThis will have ramifications
.
http://www.smartbrief.com/news/sifmaglobal/storyDetails.jsp?issueid=DE45E469-786A-4D5F-8363-3CDB39CA7009©id=CF6988CC-50D6-448B-B0EA-8D2AC1CD77AAMarket to set price for settling $500 billion in contracts
SIFMA GLOBAL SMARTBRIEF | 10/06/2008
Through a series of auctions due to be completed today, the credit derivatives market will determine the price — known as the recovery value — for as much as $500 billion in Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-related contracts. “The operational risks of having [the biggest auctions ever] in an extremely risk-averse market lead us to think that recoveries may be lower than the market expects,” said a Citi analyst. Financial Times (10/05)http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/
If we look at today’s global environment we see a relatively high performance system driven by real-time global markets and rapid technological progress. Its performance explains why it is spreading so quickly. However, it is also moderately unstable. In our drive towards higher levels of performance we pursued a path of rampant global interconnectivity that has quickly outpaced our ability to dampen excess. The old dampening functions of borders, distance, government, etc are quickly fading. The result is a system vulnerable to rogue feedback. Even a small amount of it can cause global reverberations….
This conclusion also calls into question the efficacy of the idea that merely increasing connectivity is an answer to our problems. Increasing connectivity too fast, in a system without intrinsic dampening or control systems that work, will only accelerate the chaos (human nature doesn’t change as fast as technology)…. Also, the complexity of this system puts the lie to the idea that we know how to actively dampen its behavior through centralized systems of control. We neither have the scale nor the collective intelligence to pull it off. The only real solution rests on redesigning the system itself, to enable it to become more tolerant of rogue feedback…
October 6, 2008 at 8:21 AM #282194ArrayaParticipantThis will have ramifications
.
http://www.smartbrief.com/news/sifmaglobal/storyDetails.jsp?issueid=DE45E469-786A-4D5F-8363-3CDB39CA7009©id=CF6988CC-50D6-448B-B0EA-8D2AC1CD77AAMarket to set price for settling $500 billion in contracts
SIFMA GLOBAL SMARTBRIEF | 10/06/2008
Through a series of auctions due to be completed today, the credit derivatives market will determine the price — known as the recovery value — for as much as $500 billion in Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-related contracts. “The operational risks of having [the biggest auctions ever] in an extremely risk-averse market lead us to think that recoveries may be lower than the market expects,” said a Citi analyst. Financial Times (10/05)http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/
If we look at today’s global environment we see a relatively high performance system driven by real-time global markets and rapid technological progress. Its performance explains why it is spreading so quickly. However, it is also moderately unstable. In our drive towards higher levels of performance we pursued a path of rampant global interconnectivity that has quickly outpaced our ability to dampen excess. The old dampening functions of borders, distance, government, etc are quickly fading. The result is a system vulnerable to rogue feedback. Even a small amount of it can cause global reverberations….
This conclusion also calls into question the efficacy of the idea that merely increasing connectivity is an answer to our problems. Increasing connectivity too fast, in a system without intrinsic dampening or control systems that work, will only accelerate the chaos (human nature doesn’t change as fast as technology)…. Also, the complexity of this system puts the lie to the idea that we know how to actively dampen its behavior through centralized systems of control. We neither have the scale nor the collective intelligence to pull it off. The only real solution rests on redesigning the system itself, to enable it to become more tolerant of rogue feedback…
October 6, 2008 at 8:21 AM #282198ArrayaParticipantThis will have ramifications
.
http://www.smartbrief.com/news/sifmaglobal/storyDetails.jsp?issueid=DE45E469-786A-4D5F-8363-3CDB39CA7009©id=CF6988CC-50D6-448B-B0EA-8D2AC1CD77AAMarket to set price for settling $500 billion in contracts
SIFMA GLOBAL SMARTBRIEF | 10/06/2008
Through a series of auctions due to be completed today, the credit derivatives market will determine the price — known as the recovery value — for as much as $500 billion in Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-related contracts. “The operational risks of having [the biggest auctions ever] in an extremely risk-averse market lead us to think that recoveries may be lower than the market expects,” said a Citi analyst. Financial Times (10/05)http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/
If we look at today’s global environment we see a relatively high performance system driven by real-time global markets and rapid technological progress. Its performance explains why it is spreading so quickly. However, it is also moderately unstable. In our drive towards higher levels of performance we pursued a path of rampant global interconnectivity that has quickly outpaced our ability to dampen excess. The old dampening functions of borders, distance, government, etc are quickly fading. The result is a system vulnerable to rogue feedback. Even a small amount of it can cause global reverberations….
This conclusion also calls into question the efficacy of the idea that merely increasing connectivity is an answer to our problems. Increasing connectivity too fast, in a system without intrinsic dampening or control systems that work, will only accelerate the chaos (human nature doesn’t change as fast as technology)…. Also, the complexity of this system puts the lie to the idea that we know how to actively dampen its behavior through centralized systems of control. We neither have the scale nor the collective intelligence to pull it off. The only real solution rests on redesigning the system itself, to enable it to become more tolerant of rogue feedback…
October 6, 2008 at 8:21 AM #282240ArrayaParticipantThis will have ramifications
.
http://www.smartbrief.com/news/sifmaglobal/storyDetails.jsp?issueid=DE45E469-786A-4D5F-8363-3CDB39CA7009©id=CF6988CC-50D6-448B-B0EA-8D2AC1CD77AAMarket to set price for settling $500 billion in contracts
SIFMA GLOBAL SMARTBRIEF | 10/06/2008
Through a series of auctions due to be completed today, the credit derivatives market will determine the price — known as the recovery value — for as much as $500 billion in Fannie Mae- and Freddie Mac-related contracts. “The operational risks of having [the biggest auctions ever] in an extremely risk-averse market lead us to think that recoveries may be lower than the market expects,” said a Citi analyst. Financial Times (10/05)http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/
If we look at today’s global environment we see a relatively high performance system driven by real-time global markets and rapid technological progress. Its performance explains why it is spreading so quickly. However, it is also moderately unstable. In our drive towards higher levels of performance we pursued a path of rampant global interconnectivity that has quickly outpaced our ability to dampen excess. The old dampening functions of borders, distance, government, etc are quickly fading. The result is a system vulnerable to rogue feedback. Even a small amount of it can cause global reverberations….
This conclusion also calls into question the efficacy of the idea that merely increasing connectivity is an answer to our problems. Increasing connectivity too fast, in a system without intrinsic dampening or control systems that work, will only accelerate the chaos (human nature doesn’t change as fast as technology)…. Also, the complexity of this system puts the lie to the idea that we know how to actively dampen its behavior through centralized systems of control. We neither have the scale nor the collective intelligence to pull it off. The only real solution rests on redesigning the system itself, to enable it to become more tolerant of rogue feedback…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.