- This topic has 340 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 20, 2009 at 12:17 AM #418577June 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM #418016
patb
ParticipantThis is really typical of the sad dissolution of the GOP.
The party is reduced to bizarre theories about Obama’s past.Sometimes Brilliant is more then in grades. Sometimes Amazing is in more
then LSAT’s. Maybe Obama didn’t want to clerk, but needed to make
some money at a firm.If the theory was Obama was just an AA baby, then I suggest they
find data. Dig up facts. Interview people.Oterwise STFU
June 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM #418246patb
ParticipantThis is really typical of the sad dissolution of the GOP.
The party is reduced to bizarre theories about Obama’s past.Sometimes Brilliant is more then in grades. Sometimes Amazing is in more
then LSAT’s. Maybe Obama didn’t want to clerk, but needed to make
some money at a firm.If the theory was Obama was just an AA baby, then I suggest they
find data. Dig up facts. Interview people.Oterwise STFU
June 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM #418510patb
ParticipantThis is really typical of the sad dissolution of the GOP.
The party is reduced to bizarre theories about Obama’s past.Sometimes Brilliant is more then in grades. Sometimes Amazing is in more
then LSAT’s. Maybe Obama didn’t want to clerk, but needed to make
some money at a firm.If the theory was Obama was just an AA baby, then I suggest they
find data. Dig up facts. Interview people.Oterwise STFU
June 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM #418575patb
ParticipantThis is really typical of the sad dissolution of the GOP.
The party is reduced to bizarre theories about Obama’s past.Sometimes Brilliant is more then in grades. Sometimes Amazing is in more
then LSAT’s. Maybe Obama didn’t want to clerk, but needed to make
some money at a firm.If the theory was Obama was just an AA baby, then I suggest they
find data. Dig up facts. Interview people.Oterwise STFU
June 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM #418736patb
ParticipantThis is really typical of the sad dissolution of the GOP.
The party is reduced to bizarre theories about Obama’s past.Sometimes Brilliant is more then in grades. Sometimes Amazing is in more
then LSAT’s. Maybe Obama didn’t want to clerk, but needed to make
some money at a firm.If the theory was Obama was just an AA baby, then I suggest they
find data. Dig up facts. Interview people.Oterwise STFU
June 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM #418021surveyor
Participantintelligensia
Fishsticks, I’m glad that you accede my point. However, most people have never claimed Obama to be unintelligent or less intelligent than Bush. My main criticism of him is his lack of historical knowledge. In Bush’s case, however, there have been many people who have claimed him to be unintelligent, a claim that is factually untrue.
A person who scores a 25% on a pilot aptitude test does not automatically get labeled a moron. Many people would get a score of 10% on a molecular biology examination, but that does not mean they are unintelligent. My proof lies in that his aility to fly a plane, pass the test and meet qualifications is proof of his intelligence. Those facts expose the lie that he is unintelligent.
June 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM #418251surveyor
Participantintelligensia
Fishsticks, I’m glad that you accede my point. However, most people have never claimed Obama to be unintelligent or less intelligent than Bush. My main criticism of him is his lack of historical knowledge. In Bush’s case, however, there have been many people who have claimed him to be unintelligent, a claim that is factually untrue.
A person who scores a 25% on a pilot aptitude test does not automatically get labeled a moron. Many people would get a score of 10% on a molecular biology examination, but that does not mean they are unintelligent. My proof lies in that his aility to fly a plane, pass the test and meet qualifications is proof of his intelligence. Those facts expose the lie that he is unintelligent.
June 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM #418515surveyor
Participantintelligensia
Fishsticks, I’m glad that you accede my point. However, most people have never claimed Obama to be unintelligent or less intelligent than Bush. My main criticism of him is his lack of historical knowledge. In Bush’s case, however, there have been many people who have claimed him to be unintelligent, a claim that is factually untrue.
A person who scores a 25% on a pilot aptitude test does not automatically get labeled a moron. Many people would get a score of 10% on a molecular biology examination, but that does not mean they are unintelligent. My proof lies in that his aility to fly a plane, pass the test and meet qualifications is proof of his intelligence. Those facts expose the lie that he is unintelligent.
June 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM #418580surveyor
Participantintelligensia
Fishsticks, I’m glad that you accede my point. However, most people have never claimed Obama to be unintelligent or less intelligent than Bush. My main criticism of him is his lack of historical knowledge. In Bush’s case, however, there have been many people who have claimed him to be unintelligent, a claim that is factually untrue.
A person who scores a 25% on a pilot aptitude test does not automatically get labeled a moron. Many people would get a score of 10% on a molecular biology examination, but that does not mean they are unintelligent. My proof lies in that his aility to fly a plane, pass the test and meet qualifications is proof of his intelligence. Those facts expose the lie that he is unintelligent.
June 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM #418741surveyor
Participantintelligensia
Fishsticks, I’m glad that you accede my point. However, most people have never claimed Obama to be unintelligent or less intelligent than Bush. My main criticism of him is his lack of historical knowledge. In Bush’s case, however, there have been many people who have claimed him to be unintelligent, a claim that is factually untrue.
A person who scores a 25% on a pilot aptitude test does not automatically get labeled a moron. Many people would get a score of 10% on a molecular biology examination, but that does not mean they are unintelligent. My proof lies in that his aility to fly a plane, pass the test and meet qualifications is proof of his intelligence. Those facts expose the lie that he is unintelligent.
June 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM #418026afx114
ParticipantAny President’s intelligence will be judged by history, not by test scores or the ability to fly a plane or pass the bar exam.
June 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM #418256afx114
ParticipantAny President’s intelligence will be judged by history, not by test scores or the ability to fly a plane or pass the bar exam.
June 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM #418519afx114
ParticipantAny President’s intelligence will be judged by history, not by test scores or the ability to fly a plane or pass the bar exam.
June 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM #418585afx114
ParticipantAny President’s intelligence will be judged by history, not by test scores or the ability to fly a plane or pass the bar exam.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.