- This topic has 90 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 29, 2010 at 4:29 PM #574056June 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM #574046EugeneParticipant
I believe we had a bunch of ships there all along. Before Truman, it was USS Eisenhower and her strike group (continuously since January). She was deployed there for 6 months, now she’s headed home and USS Truman is there to take her place.
Also, I don’t see how a single strike group with 6,000 sailors and around 80 aircraft (presumably, mostly F-18’s, not heavy bombers), can have much impact on any war between Israel and Iran. When we invaded Iraq, we had 500,000 ground troops. I’m not sure how many aircraft carriers were involved, but it had to be more than one. And Iran is bigger and better defended than Iraq was.
June 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM #573431EugeneParticipantI believe we had a bunch of ships there all along. Before Truman, it was USS Eisenhower and her strike group (continuously since January). She was deployed there for 6 months, now she’s headed home and USS Truman is there to take her place.
Also, I don’t see how a single strike group with 6,000 sailors and around 80 aircraft (presumably, mostly F-18’s, not heavy bombers), can have much impact on any war between Israel and Iran. When we invaded Iraq, we had 500,000 ground troops. I’m not sure how many aircraft carriers were involved, but it had to be more than one. And Iran is bigger and better defended than Iraq was.
June 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM #574152EugeneParticipantI believe we had a bunch of ships there all along. Before Truman, it was USS Eisenhower and her strike group (continuously since January). She was deployed there for 6 months, now she’s headed home and USS Truman is there to take her place.
Also, I don’t see how a single strike group with 6,000 sailors and around 80 aircraft (presumably, mostly F-18’s, not heavy bombers), can have much impact on any war between Israel and Iran. When we invaded Iraq, we had 500,000 ground troops. I’m not sure how many aircraft carriers were involved, but it had to be more than one. And Iran is bigger and better defended than Iraq was.
June 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM #573526EugeneParticipantI believe we had a bunch of ships there all along. Before Truman, it was USS Eisenhower and her strike group (continuously since January). She was deployed there for 6 months, now she’s headed home and USS Truman is there to take her place.
Also, I don’t see how a single strike group with 6,000 sailors and around 80 aircraft (presumably, mostly F-18’s, not heavy bombers), can have much impact on any war between Israel and Iran. When we invaded Iraq, we had 500,000 ground troops. I’m not sure how many aircraft carriers were involved, but it had to be more than one. And Iran is bigger and better defended than Iraq was.
June 29, 2010 at 4:36 PM #574451EugeneParticipantI believe we had a bunch of ships there all along. Before Truman, it was USS Eisenhower and her strike group (continuously since January). She was deployed there for 6 months, now she’s headed home and USS Truman is there to take her place.
Also, I don’t see how a single strike group with 6,000 sailors and around 80 aircraft (presumably, mostly F-18’s, not heavy bombers), can have much impact on any war between Israel and Iran. When we invaded Iraq, we had 500,000 ground troops. I’m not sure how many aircraft carriers were involved, but it had to be more than one. And Iran is bigger and better defended than Iraq was.
June 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM #573580NeetaTParticipantA sharp spike in oil prices usually follows this type of news. I think the news reflects more of a supposition.
June 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM #574506NeetaTParticipantA sharp spike in oil prices usually follows this type of news. I think the news reflects more of a supposition.
June 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM #573485NeetaTParticipantA sharp spike in oil prices usually follows this type of news. I think the news reflects more of a supposition.
June 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM #574101NeetaTParticipantA sharp spike in oil prices usually follows this type of news. I think the news reflects more of a supposition.
June 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM #574207NeetaTParticipantA sharp spike in oil prices usually follows this type of news. I think the news reflects more of a supposition.
June 29, 2010 at 7:35 PM #574546AecetiaParticipantMaybe we are there to protect Iran from Israel?
June 29, 2010 at 7:35 PM #573620AecetiaParticipantMaybe we are there to protect Iran from Israel?
June 29, 2010 at 7:35 PM #574141AecetiaParticipantMaybe we are there to protect Iran from Israel?
June 29, 2010 at 7:35 PM #573525AecetiaParticipantMaybe we are there to protect Iran from Israel?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.