- This topic has 285 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2010 at 7:23 PM #637245December 7, 2010 at 12:10 PM #636346briansd1Guest
Good post GH. short to medium term, It’s all about preventing the cascading effects of default.
December 7, 2010 at 12:10 PM #636421briansd1GuestGood post GH. short to medium term, It’s all about preventing the cascading effects of default.
December 7, 2010 at 12:10 PM #636999briansd1GuestGood post GH. short to medium term, It’s all about preventing the cascading effects of default.
December 7, 2010 at 12:10 PM #637132briansd1GuestGood post GH. short to medium term, It’s all about preventing the cascading effects of default.
December 7, 2010 at 12:10 PM #637449briansd1GuestGood post GH. short to medium term, It’s all about preventing the cascading effects of default.
December 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM #636356EugeneParticipant[quote=ocrenter]unfortunately it appears neither side of the aisle want to get serious abut the debt.
I’m feeling more and more hopeless about the future of this country with each passing day.[/quote]
Please provide any rationale for why we should get serious about the debt now, as opposed to when the economy is at full employment. Especially since the government can borrow at 2.5% for 10 years.
Ireland is very serious about the debt. Does not seem to be working well for them.
December 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM #636431EugeneParticipant[quote=ocrenter]unfortunately it appears neither side of the aisle want to get serious abut the debt.
I’m feeling more and more hopeless about the future of this country with each passing day.[/quote]
Please provide any rationale for why we should get serious about the debt now, as opposed to when the economy is at full employment. Especially since the government can borrow at 2.5% for 10 years.
Ireland is very serious about the debt. Does not seem to be working well for them.
December 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM #637009EugeneParticipant[quote=ocrenter]unfortunately it appears neither side of the aisle want to get serious abut the debt.
I’m feeling more and more hopeless about the future of this country with each passing day.[/quote]
Please provide any rationale for why we should get serious about the debt now, as opposed to when the economy is at full employment. Especially since the government can borrow at 2.5% for 10 years.
Ireland is very serious about the debt. Does not seem to be working well for them.
December 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM #637142EugeneParticipant[quote=ocrenter]unfortunately it appears neither side of the aisle want to get serious abut the debt.
I’m feeling more and more hopeless about the future of this country with each passing day.[/quote]
Please provide any rationale for why we should get serious about the debt now, as opposed to when the economy is at full employment. Especially since the government can borrow at 2.5% for 10 years.
Ireland is very serious about the debt. Does not seem to be working well for them.
December 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM #637459EugeneParticipant[quote=ocrenter]unfortunately it appears neither side of the aisle want to get serious abut the debt.
I’m feeling more and more hopeless about the future of this country with each passing day.[/quote]
Please provide any rationale for why we should get serious about the debt now, as opposed to when the economy is at full employment. Especially since the government can borrow at 2.5% for 10 years.
Ireland is very serious about the debt. Does not seem to be working well for them.
December 7, 2010 at 12:35 PM #636366ocrenterParticipantyou do realize we may never reach “full employment.”
over the last couple of decades, we appeared to be in “full employment” mostly due to bubble driven economies. the tech bubble gave a bunch of folks jobs that otherwise would not be there. the housing bubble of course allowed for a lot of extra Realtors, construction workers, loan processors as well as a bunch of folks in retail and interior design that frankly would not have jobs if not for the bubble environment.
this recession will last for a long time, and when it is over, we WILL not get back to that “full employment” status. Unless of course we create another bubble.
So while we think up of a new bubble so we can get back to that magical “full employment,” what should we do? pile on the debt?
The truth about the over 250k class is this: If their income over 250k is tax’d heavily, it would be their incentive to spend that > 250k income as much as possible in the form of business related deductions. If their over 250k income is not taxed as heavily, they just end up saving it or investing in financial holdings.
December 7, 2010 at 12:35 PM #636441ocrenterParticipantyou do realize we may never reach “full employment.”
over the last couple of decades, we appeared to be in “full employment” mostly due to bubble driven economies. the tech bubble gave a bunch of folks jobs that otherwise would not be there. the housing bubble of course allowed for a lot of extra Realtors, construction workers, loan processors as well as a bunch of folks in retail and interior design that frankly would not have jobs if not for the bubble environment.
this recession will last for a long time, and when it is over, we WILL not get back to that “full employment” status. Unless of course we create another bubble.
So while we think up of a new bubble so we can get back to that magical “full employment,” what should we do? pile on the debt?
The truth about the over 250k class is this: If their income over 250k is tax’d heavily, it would be their incentive to spend that > 250k income as much as possible in the form of business related deductions. If their over 250k income is not taxed as heavily, they just end up saving it or investing in financial holdings.
December 7, 2010 at 12:35 PM #637019ocrenterParticipantyou do realize we may never reach “full employment.”
over the last couple of decades, we appeared to be in “full employment” mostly due to bubble driven economies. the tech bubble gave a bunch of folks jobs that otherwise would not be there. the housing bubble of course allowed for a lot of extra Realtors, construction workers, loan processors as well as a bunch of folks in retail and interior design that frankly would not have jobs if not for the bubble environment.
this recession will last for a long time, and when it is over, we WILL not get back to that “full employment” status. Unless of course we create another bubble.
So while we think up of a new bubble so we can get back to that magical “full employment,” what should we do? pile on the debt?
The truth about the over 250k class is this: If their income over 250k is tax’d heavily, it would be their incentive to spend that > 250k income as much as possible in the form of business related deductions. If their over 250k income is not taxed as heavily, they just end up saving it or investing in financial holdings.
December 7, 2010 at 12:35 PM #637151ocrenterParticipantyou do realize we may never reach “full employment.”
over the last couple of decades, we appeared to be in “full employment” mostly due to bubble driven economies. the tech bubble gave a bunch of folks jobs that otherwise would not be there. the housing bubble of course allowed for a lot of extra Realtors, construction workers, loan processors as well as a bunch of folks in retail and interior design that frankly would not have jobs if not for the bubble environment.
this recession will last for a long time, and when it is over, we WILL not get back to that “full employment” status. Unless of course we create another bubble.
So while we think up of a new bubble so we can get back to that magical “full employment,” what should we do? pile on the debt?
The truth about the over 250k class is this: If their income over 250k is tax’d heavily, it would be their incentive to spend that > 250k income as much as possible in the form of business related deductions. If their over 250k income is not taxed as heavily, they just end up saving it or investing in financial holdings.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.