OT: San Diego County turns blue this week

[an]

[quote=urbanrealtor]
As well as the voting public.

You can bitch about the messenger if you like but the message is still that as of this election, there is not a strong 3rd party candidate. But please, be my guest and split the right. It would make me very happy.[/quote]
How about splitting the left? I was a registered Democrat until this year. It’s a chicken and egg question. You can’t have a viable 3rd party unless they have press time and more people know about them. But they won’t have press time until they become viable. So average Joe will never hear about them. Luckily, there is such thing as YouTube and the Internet. We no longer need to depend on the MSM to get info. As long as we’re willing to look.

[urbanrealtor]

Yeah cuz the internet is not mainstream.

If they were that big on the net, they would be picked up by the scary MSM.

The news is a lens, not an agent.

Thats why piggington was mentioned in the NY times.

[urbanrealtor]

Yeah cuz the internet is not mainstream.

If they were that big on the net, they would be picked up by the scary MSM.

The news is a lens, not an agent.

Thats why piggington was mentioned in the NY times.

[urbanrealtor]

Yeah cuz the internet is not mainstream.

If they were that big on the net, they would be picked up by the scary MSM.

The news is a lens, not an agent.

Thats why piggington was mentioned in the NY times.

[urbanrealtor]

Yeah cuz the internet is not mainstream.

If they were that big on the net, they would be picked up by the scary MSM.

The news is a lens, not an agent.

Thats why piggington was mentioned in the NY times.

[urbanrealtor]

Yeah cuz the internet is not mainstream.

If they were that big on the net, they would be picked up by the scary MSM.

The news is a lens, not an agent.

Thats why piggington was mentioned in the NY times.

[svelte]

I have noticed a lot of what seems to be the MSM putting out a story that has been on the blogs for weeks.

It appears to me that, since media staffs have continually been cut lately, they look for the easy story by searching the net. They find something good on the blogs, use the idea as the seed for their story, change it so it can’t be attributed to any specific blog, and blam! instant story!

I guess there is nothing wrong with that, since they can get the opinions of many, many more people in shorter time with that method than going out in the real world and talking to people. Except that it doesn’t cover those that aren’t net-savy.

[svelte]

I have noticed a lot of what seems to be the MSM putting out a story that has been on the blogs for weeks.

It appears to me that, since media staffs have continually been cut lately, they look for the easy story by searching the net. They find something good on the blogs, use the idea as the seed for their story, change it so it can’t be attributed to any specific blog, and blam! instant story!

I guess there is nothing wrong with that, since they can get the opinions of many, many more people in shorter time with that method than going out in the real world and talking to people. Except that it doesn’t cover those that aren’t net-savy.

[svelte]

I have noticed a lot of what seems to be the MSM putting out a story that has been on the blogs for weeks.

It appears to me that, since media staffs have continually been cut lately, they look for the easy story by searching the net. They find something good on the blogs, use the idea as the seed for their story, change it so it can’t be attributed to any specific blog, and blam! instant story!

I guess there is nothing wrong with that, since they can get the opinions of many, many more people in shorter time with that method than going out in the real world and talking to people. Except that it doesn’t cover those that aren’t net-savy.

[svelte]

I have noticed a lot of what seems to be the MSM putting out a story that has been on the blogs for weeks.

It appears to me that, since media staffs have continually been cut lately, they look for the easy story by searching the net. They find something good on the blogs, use the idea as the seed for their story, change it so it can’t be attributed to any specific blog, and blam! instant story!

I guess there is nothing wrong with that, since they can get the opinions of many, many more people in shorter time with that method than going out in the real world and talking to people. Except that it doesn’t cover those that aren’t net-savy.

[svelte]

I have noticed a lot of what seems to be the MSM putting out a story that has been on the blogs for weeks.

It appears to me that, since media staffs have continually been cut lately, they look for the easy story by searching the net. They find something good on the blogs, use the idea as the seed for their story, change it so it can’t be attributed to any specific blog, and blam! instant story!

I guess there is nothing wrong with that, since they can get the opinions of many, many more people in shorter time with that method than going out in the real world and talking to people. Except that it doesn’t cover those that aren’t net-savy.

[Author]

Posts