- This topic has 70 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 23, 2011 at 3:18 PM #723329August 23, 2011 at 4:05 PM #723383jpinpbParticipant
I remember seeing a pie chart somewhere about how many people are still benefitting from low Prop 13 taxes, but I can’t find it. It was low. I did come across this.
Since the measure passed, the assessed value of homeowner property has grown at an average of 8.1% per year, and assessed value of non‐homeowner property subject to Proposition 13 has grown an average of 8.4% per year, according to data from the California State Board of Equalization, specifically Page 11 through 14 or so.
Edit: On average, 20% of all Californians move every month and the proposition was passed over 30 years ago. 8% of San Diego County homeowners who are at that original 1978 rate.
August 23, 2011 at 4:05 PM #724489jpinpbParticipantI remember seeing a pie chart somewhere about how many people are still benefitting from low Prop 13 taxes, but I can’t find it. It was low. I did come across this.
Since the measure passed, the assessed value of homeowner property has grown at an average of 8.1% per year, and assessed value of non‐homeowner property subject to Proposition 13 has grown an average of 8.4% per year, according to data from the California State Board of Equalization, specifically Page 11 through 14 or so.
Edit: On average, 20% of all Californians move every month and the proposition was passed over 30 years ago. 8% of San Diego County homeowners who are at that original 1978 rate.
August 23, 2011 at 4:05 PM #724131jpinpbParticipantI remember seeing a pie chart somewhere about how many people are still benefitting from low Prop 13 taxes, but I can’t find it. It was low. I did come across this.
Since the measure passed, the assessed value of homeowner property has grown at an average of 8.1% per year, and assessed value of non‐homeowner property subject to Proposition 13 has grown an average of 8.4% per year, according to data from the California State Board of Equalization, specifically Page 11 through 14 or so.
Edit: On average, 20% of all Californians move every month and the proposition was passed over 30 years ago. 8% of San Diego County homeowners who are at that original 1978 rate.
August 23, 2011 at 4:05 PM #723977jpinpbParticipantI remember seeing a pie chart somewhere about how many people are still benefitting from low Prop 13 taxes, but I can’t find it. It was low. I did come across this.
Since the measure passed, the assessed value of homeowner property has grown at an average of 8.1% per year, and assessed value of non‐homeowner property subject to Proposition 13 has grown an average of 8.4% per year, according to data from the California State Board of Equalization, specifically Page 11 through 14 or so.
Edit: On average, 20% of all Californians move every month and the proposition was passed over 30 years ago. 8% of San Diego County homeowners who are at that original 1978 rate.
August 23, 2011 at 4:05 PM #723293jpinpbParticipantI remember seeing a pie chart somewhere about how many people are still benefitting from low Prop 13 taxes, but I can’t find it. It was low. I did come across this.
Since the measure passed, the assessed value of homeowner property has grown at an average of 8.1% per year, and assessed value of non‐homeowner property subject to Proposition 13 has grown an average of 8.4% per year, according to data from the California State Board of Equalization, specifically Page 11 through 14 or so.
Edit: On average, 20% of all Californians move every month and the proposition was passed over 30 years ago. 8% of San Diego County homeowners who are at that original 1978 rate.
August 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM #726705briansd1GuestHow the hell did Romney get Coastal Commission approval to bulldose the house?
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A62D1ECD-311_Dunemere_Dr_La_Jolla_CA_92037
I know people who have problems getting approval for a partial tear-down and rebuild.
It shows you that with enough money you can get anything done, even to “historic” houses.
http://piggington.com/when_is_a_house_historic_and_when_is_it_a_teardown
I personally think that the preservation movement in some neighborhoods is bullshit with neighbors picking on other neighbors because they are jealous. They should really work to preserve the really substantial houses that have more historic value and significance. What’s the point of preserving some bungalow when large significant houses are torn down all the time?
August 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM #726791briansd1GuestHow the hell did Romney get Coastal Commission approval to bulldose the house?
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A62D1ECD-311_Dunemere_Dr_La_Jolla_CA_92037
I know people who have problems getting approval for a partial tear-down and rebuild.
It shows you that with enough money you can get anything done, even to “historic” houses.
http://piggington.com/when_is_a_house_historic_and_when_is_it_a_teardown
I personally think that the preservation movement in some neighborhoods is bullshit with neighbors picking on other neighbors because they are jealous. They should really work to preserve the really substantial houses that have more historic value and significance. What’s the point of preserving some bungalow when large significant houses are torn down all the time?
August 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM #727400briansd1GuestHow the hell did Romney get Coastal Commission approval to bulldose the house?
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A62D1ECD-311_Dunemere_Dr_La_Jolla_CA_92037
I know people who have problems getting approval for a partial tear-down and rebuild.
It shows you that with enough money you can get anything done, even to “historic” houses.
http://piggington.com/when_is_a_house_historic_and_when_is_it_a_teardown
I personally think that the preservation movement in some neighborhoods is bullshit with neighbors picking on other neighbors because they are jealous. They should really work to preserve the really substantial houses that have more historic value and significance. What’s the point of preserving some bungalow when large significant houses are torn down all the time?
August 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM #727555briansd1GuestHow the hell did Romney get Coastal Commission approval to bulldose the house?
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A62D1ECD-311_Dunemere_Dr_La_Jolla_CA_92037
I know people who have problems getting approval for a partial tear-down and rebuild.
It shows you that with enough money you can get anything done, even to “historic” houses.
http://piggington.com/when_is_a_house_historic_and_when_is_it_a_teardown
I personally think that the preservation movement in some neighborhoods is bullshit with neighbors picking on other neighbors because they are jealous. They should really work to preserve the really substantial houses that have more historic value and significance. What’s the point of preserving some bungalow when large significant houses are torn down all the time?
August 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM #727917briansd1GuestHow the hell did Romney get Coastal Commission approval to bulldose the house?
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A62D1ECD-311_Dunemere_Dr_La_Jolla_CA_92037
I know people who have problems getting approval for a partial tear-down and rebuild.
It shows you that with enough money you can get anything done, even to “historic” houses.
http://piggington.com/when_is_a_house_historic_and_when_is_it_a_teardown
I personally think that the preservation movement in some neighborhoods is bullshit with neighbors picking on other neighbors because they are jealous. They should really work to preserve the really substantial houses that have more historic value and significance. What’s the point of preserving some bungalow when large significant houses are torn down all the time?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.