- This topic has 425 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
Shadowfax.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM #383665April 17, 2009 at 11:58 AM #383049
Zeitgeist
ParticipantCollege Frat boys routinely participate in various forms of torture including sleep deprivation. Torture is in the eye of the beholder. Many of you are truly naive when it comes to dealing with evil. You must be religious because you are so willing to refuse to sink to the level required by the extreme threat to your country. Your meekness is interpreted as weakness by the enemy, not adherence to a rule of law. They are playing by different rules and they are playing to win. Apparently you have not figured that one out.
April 17, 2009 at 11:58 AM #383318ParticipantCollege Frat boys routinely participate in various forms of torture including sleep deprivation. Torture is in the eye of the beholder. Many of you are truly naive when it comes to dealing with evil. You must be religious because you are so willing to refuse to sink to the level required by the extreme threat to your country. Your meekness is interpreted as weakness by the enemy, not adherence to a rule of law. They are playing by different rules and they are playing to win. Apparently you have not figured that one out.
April 17, 2009 at 11:58 AM #383505ParticipantCollege Frat boys routinely participate in various forms of torture including sleep deprivation. Torture is in the eye of the beholder. Many of you are truly naive when it comes to dealing with evil. You must be religious because you are so willing to refuse to sink to the level required by the extreme threat to your country. Your meekness is interpreted as weakness by the enemy, not adherence to a rule of law. They are playing by different rules and they are playing to win. Apparently you have not figured that one out.
April 17, 2009 at 11:58 AM #383554ParticipantCollege Frat boys routinely participate in various forms of torture including sleep deprivation. Torture is in the eye of the beholder. Many of you are truly naive when it comes to dealing with evil. You must be religious because you are so willing to refuse to sink to the level required by the extreme threat to your country. Your meekness is interpreted as weakness by the enemy, not adherence to a rule of law. They are playing by different rules and they are playing to win. Apparently you have not figured that one out.
April 17, 2009 at 11:58 AM #383685ParticipantCollege Frat boys routinely participate in various forms of torture including sleep deprivation. Torture is in the eye of the beholder. Many of you are truly naive when it comes to dealing with evil. You must be religious because you are so willing to refuse to sink to the level required by the extreme threat to your country. Your meekness is interpreted as weakness by the enemy, not adherence to a rule of law. They are playing by different rules and they are playing to win. Apparently you have not figured that one out.
April 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM #383059SDEngineer
Participant[quote=afx114][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]You would be amazed what sitting down with someone over a period of hours or days can produce in terms of useful intelligence.[/quote]
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn’t Saddam reveal some stuff to his guards after months of being buddy-buddy with them? What we should do with suspected terrorists is throw back a few beers with them, play some Lego Star Wars, break the ice, and shoot the shit — who knows what they might reveal.
[/quote]Even the Nazi’s knew this was the most effective form of gathering useful information from a prisoner. Their best interrogators never used torture, nor did they threaten the use of torture. They essentially used the Copenhagen Syndrome to get the prisoners to tell them willingly what they wanted to know, and ALL of what they wanted to know. A cooperative prisoner is much more useful than an uncooperative one.
Over a prolonged period of time, I don’t even think the most radical extremist would be able to hold out under this method. You can essentially “deprogram” them at your leisure. And I’m pretty sure that any extremist hard core enough to resist this would be equally difficult to break via torture.
Using torture is counterproductive. The prisoner being tortured is constantly reminded of why they despise the torturer (and by extension the country employing them), and will simply tell the torturer enough to get them to stop – and that will be whatever the torturer wants to hear – not the truth, and certainly not the whole truth.
The only situation I could see torture being even remotely useful for is in the “Ticking Time Bomb” situation – and even then, it’s only because there is no time to do anything else – it’s not because the information gained is reliable. And frankly, I agree with the people above – in that incredibly rare scenario, you might be able to justify breaking the law, but it doesn’t justify crafting the law around that scenario and assuming that that scenario is a common one (frankly, I don’t know if that scenario has ever actually occurred).
April 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM #383328Participant[quote=afx114][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]You would be amazed what sitting down with someone over a period of hours or days can produce in terms of useful intelligence.[/quote]
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn’t Saddam reveal some stuff to his guards after months of being buddy-buddy with them? What we should do with suspected terrorists is throw back a few beers with them, play some Lego Star Wars, break the ice, and shoot the shit — who knows what they might reveal.
[/quote]Even the Nazi’s knew this was the most effective form of gathering useful information from a prisoner. Their best interrogators never used torture, nor did they threaten the use of torture. They essentially used the Copenhagen Syndrome to get the prisoners to tell them willingly what they wanted to know, and ALL of what they wanted to know. A cooperative prisoner is much more useful than an uncooperative one.
Over a prolonged period of time, I don’t even think the most radical extremist would be able to hold out under this method. You can essentially “deprogram” them at your leisure. And I’m pretty sure that any extremist hard core enough to resist this would be equally difficult to break via torture.
Using torture is counterproductive. The prisoner being tortured is constantly reminded of why they despise the torturer (and by extension the country employing them), and will simply tell the torturer enough to get them to stop – and that will be whatever the torturer wants to hear – not the truth, and certainly not the whole truth.
The only situation I could see torture being even remotely useful for is in the “Ticking Time Bomb” situation – and even then, it’s only because there is no time to do anything else – it’s not because the information gained is reliable. And frankly, I agree with the people above – in that incredibly rare scenario, you might be able to justify breaking the law, but it doesn’t justify crafting the law around that scenario and assuming that that scenario is a common one (frankly, I don’t know if that scenario has ever actually occurred).
April 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM #383515Participant[quote=afx114][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]You would be amazed what sitting down with someone over a period of hours or days can produce in terms of useful intelligence.[/quote]
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn’t Saddam reveal some stuff to his guards after months of being buddy-buddy with them? What we should do with suspected terrorists is throw back a few beers with them, play some Lego Star Wars, break the ice, and shoot the shit — who knows what they might reveal.
[/quote]Even the Nazi’s knew this was the most effective form of gathering useful information from a prisoner. Their best interrogators never used torture, nor did they threaten the use of torture. They essentially used the Copenhagen Syndrome to get the prisoners to tell them willingly what they wanted to know, and ALL of what they wanted to know. A cooperative prisoner is much more useful than an uncooperative one.
Over a prolonged period of time, I don’t even think the most radical extremist would be able to hold out under this method. You can essentially “deprogram” them at your leisure. And I’m pretty sure that any extremist hard core enough to resist this would be equally difficult to break via torture.
Using torture is counterproductive. The prisoner being tortured is constantly reminded of why they despise the torturer (and by extension the country employing them), and will simply tell the torturer enough to get them to stop – and that will be whatever the torturer wants to hear – not the truth, and certainly not the whole truth.
The only situation I could see torture being even remotely useful for is in the “Ticking Time Bomb” situation – and even then, it’s only because there is no time to do anything else – it’s not because the information gained is reliable. And frankly, I agree with the people above – in that incredibly rare scenario, you might be able to justify breaking the law, but it doesn’t justify crafting the law around that scenario and assuming that that scenario is a common one (frankly, I don’t know if that scenario has ever actually occurred).
April 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM #383564Participant[quote=afx114][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]You would be amazed what sitting down with someone over a period of hours or days can produce in terms of useful intelligence.[/quote]
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn’t Saddam reveal some stuff to his guards after months of being buddy-buddy with them? What we should do with suspected terrorists is throw back a few beers with them, play some Lego Star Wars, break the ice, and shoot the shit — who knows what they might reveal.
[/quote]Even the Nazi’s knew this was the most effective form of gathering useful information from a prisoner. Their best interrogators never used torture, nor did they threaten the use of torture. They essentially used the Copenhagen Syndrome to get the prisoners to tell them willingly what they wanted to know, and ALL of what they wanted to know. A cooperative prisoner is much more useful than an uncooperative one.
Over a prolonged period of time, I don’t even think the most radical extremist would be able to hold out under this method. You can essentially “deprogram” them at your leisure. And I’m pretty sure that any extremist hard core enough to resist this would be equally difficult to break via torture.
Using torture is counterproductive. The prisoner being tortured is constantly reminded of why they despise the torturer (and by extension the country employing them), and will simply tell the torturer enough to get them to stop – and that will be whatever the torturer wants to hear – not the truth, and certainly not the whole truth.
The only situation I could see torture being even remotely useful for is in the “Ticking Time Bomb” situation – and even then, it’s only because there is no time to do anything else – it’s not because the information gained is reliable. And frankly, I agree with the people above – in that incredibly rare scenario, you might be able to justify breaking the law, but it doesn’t justify crafting the law around that scenario and assuming that that scenario is a common one (frankly, I don’t know if that scenario has ever actually occurred).
April 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM #383695Participant[quote=afx114][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]You would be amazed what sitting down with someone over a period of hours or days can produce in terms of useful intelligence.[/quote]
Forgive me if I am wrong, but didn’t Saddam reveal some stuff to his guards after months of being buddy-buddy with them? What we should do with suspected terrorists is throw back a few beers with them, play some Lego Star Wars, break the ice, and shoot the shit — who knows what they might reveal.
[/quote]Even the Nazi’s knew this was the most effective form of gathering useful information from a prisoner. Their best interrogators never used torture, nor did they threaten the use of torture. They essentially used the Copenhagen Syndrome to get the prisoners to tell them willingly what they wanted to know, and ALL of what they wanted to know. A cooperative prisoner is much more useful than an uncooperative one.
Over a prolonged period of time, I don’t even think the most radical extremist would be able to hold out under this method. You can essentially “deprogram” them at your leisure. And I’m pretty sure that any extremist hard core enough to resist this would be equally difficult to break via torture.
Using torture is counterproductive. The prisoner being tortured is constantly reminded of why they despise the torturer (and by extension the country employing them), and will simply tell the torturer enough to get them to stop – and that will be whatever the torturer wants to hear – not the truth, and certainly not the whole truth.
The only situation I could see torture being even remotely useful for is in the “Ticking Time Bomb” situation – and even then, it’s only because there is no time to do anything else – it’s not because the information gained is reliable. And frankly, I agree with the people above – in that incredibly rare scenario, you might be able to justify breaking the law, but it doesn’t justify crafting the law around that scenario and assuming that that scenario is a common one (frankly, I don’t know if that scenario has ever actually occurred).
April 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM #383504sd_matt
ParticipantHas it actually occurred? I don’t know. Funny thing is how much time is spent on debate as compared to fact finding.
April 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM #383770ParticipantHas it actually occurred? I don’t know. Funny thing is how much time is spent on debate as compared to fact finding.
April 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM #383961ParticipantHas it actually occurred? I don’t know. Funny thing is how much time is spent on debate as compared to fact finding.
April 18, 2009 at 1:17 AM #384009ParticipantHas it actually occurred? I don’t know. Funny thing is how much time is spent on debate as compared to fact finding.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.