OT: Rally to restore sanity and/or fear

[Arraya]

[quote=CONCHO][quote=pri_dk]What’s your point CONCHO?

Are we supposed to be shocked that Jon Stewart’s brother is a corporate exec?

Not a surprise: Jon has mentioned it on his show a few times.

If you wanna aspire to be like Glen Beck – using innuendo and guilt by association to expose the enemy – you gotta do better than that.[/quote]

I’m not aspiring to be like anyone, I’m just pointing out that to believe that any of these people on TV would give a crap about regular people is silly. Like George Carlin used to say, “It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.”[/quote]

The Mascot: uses comedy to divert attention away from the increasingly dysfunctional family system

Stewart is pacifying meaningful resistance by aligning them with people that relay a totally devoid of reality and totally implanted comic book version of the world. Meanwhile the empire chugs along to it’s demise.

It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. —-Krishnamurti

“There is no salvation in becoming adapted to a world which is crazy.”
-Henry Miller

[briansd1]

[quote=Arraya]
There is a profound class war going on for the ownership of the country by the wealthy elites, make no mistake. And this calls for far much more than politesse.[/quote]

I absolutely agree. But the irony is that the “unwashed peasants” are the masses fighting for the very top elite.

[briansd1]

[quote=Arraya]
There is a profound class war going on for the ownership of the country by the wealthy elites, make no mistake. And this calls for far much more than politesse.[/quote]

I absolutely agree. But the irony is that the “unwashed peasants” are the masses fighting for the very top elite.

[briansd1]

[quote=Arraya]
There is a profound class war going on for the ownership of the country by the wealthy elites, make no mistake. And this calls for far much more than politesse.[/quote]

I absolutely agree. But the irony is that the “unwashed peasants” are the masses fighting for the very top elite.

[briansd1]

[quote=Arraya]
There is a profound class war going on for the ownership of the country by the wealthy elites, make no mistake. And this calls for far much more than politesse.[/quote]

I absolutely agree. But the irony is that the “unwashed peasants” are the masses fighting for the very top elite.

[briansd1]

[quote=Arraya]
There is a profound class war going on for the ownership of the country by the wealthy elites, make no mistake. And this calls for far much more than politesse.[/quote]

I absolutely agree. But the irony is that the “unwashed peasants” are the masses fighting for the very top elite.

[briansd1]

[quote=eavesdropper]
Hah! You’re right, Brian. But I chuckle because when they’re trying to confer believeability on a particular issue, event, statement, whatever, relating to their side, they always say, “The New York Times said…” or “The New York Times had an article….” or “It was in the New York Times….”. I’m, like, you just told me that the New York Times is part of the “lamestream media”, and now you’re trying to draw me over to your way of thinking by telling the NYT is at one with your views? Hmmmmm.[/quote]

Although I read the NY Times, I don’t believe everything it says.

For example, the leading news organizations were all in support or the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. I instinctively knew that they would turn into a nightmare worse than Vietnam. And they have.

[briansd1]

[quote=eavesdropper]
Hah! You’re right, Brian. But I chuckle because when they’re trying to confer believeability on a particular issue, event, statement, whatever, relating to their side, they always say, “The New York Times said…” or “The New York Times had an article….” or “It was in the New York Times….”. I’m, like, you just told me that the New York Times is part of the “lamestream media”, and now you’re trying to draw me over to your way of thinking by telling the NYT is at one with your views? Hmmmmm.[/quote]

Although I read the NY Times, I don’t believe everything it says.

For example, the leading news organizations were all in support or the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. I instinctively knew that they would turn into a nightmare worse than Vietnam. And they have.

[briansd1]

[quote=eavesdropper]
Hah! You’re right, Brian. But I chuckle because when they’re trying to confer believeability on a particular issue, event, statement, whatever, relating to their side, they always say, “The New York Times said…” or “The New York Times had an article….” or “It was in the New York Times….”. I’m, like, you just told me that the New York Times is part of the “lamestream media”, and now you’re trying to draw me over to your way of thinking by telling the NYT is at one with your views? Hmmmmm.[/quote]

Although I read the NY Times, I don’t believe everything it says.

For example, the leading news organizations were all in support or the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. I instinctively knew that they would turn into a nightmare worse than Vietnam. And they have.

[briansd1]

[quote=eavesdropper]
Hah! You’re right, Brian. But I chuckle because when they’re trying to confer believeability on a particular issue, event, statement, whatever, relating to their side, they always say, “The New York Times said…” or “The New York Times had an article….” or “It was in the New York Times….”. I’m, like, you just told me that the New York Times is part of the “lamestream media”, and now you’re trying to draw me over to your way of thinking by telling the NYT is at one with your views? Hmmmmm.[/quote]

Although I read the NY Times, I don’t believe everything it says.

For example, the leading news organizations were all in support or the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. I instinctively knew that they would turn into a nightmare worse than Vietnam. And they have.

[briansd1]

[quote=eavesdropper]
Hah! You’re right, Brian. But I chuckle because when they’re trying to confer believeability on a particular issue, event, statement, whatever, relating to their side, they always say, “The New York Times said…” or “The New York Times had an article….” or “It was in the New York Times….”. I’m, like, you just told me that the New York Times is part of the “lamestream media”, and now you’re trying to draw me over to your way of thinking by telling the NYT is at one with your views? Hmmmmm.[/quote]

Although I read the NY Times, I don’t believe everything it says.

For example, the leading news organizations were all in support or the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. I instinctively knew that they would turn into a nightmare worse than Vietnam. And they have.

[Arraya]

The “liberal” NY Times was instrumental in drumming up support for the wars

[Arraya]

The “liberal” NY Times was instrumental in drumming up support for the wars

[Arraya]

The “liberal” NY Times was instrumental in drumming up support for the wars

[Arraya]

The “liberal” NY Times was instrumental in drumming up support for the wars

[Author]

Posts