- This topic has 1,770 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by GH.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 6, 2010 at 7:10 AM #614185October 6, 2010 at 7:14 AM #613134CoronitaParticipant
I don’t know why all the negativity about a private security or firefighting squad.
Maybe the answer is a for-profit fire department in which folks pay monthly dues (kinda like insurance)…Of course there should be an option to “opt-out” of paying a portion of taxes to fund the public version…
As far as “you get what you pay for” in terms of police. I wonder with the true costs of having beat police versus funding the pensions. (don’t know)…I don’t know but, seems to me that I wouldn’t mind hiring blackwater to be my private security guard if it was affordable….Shoot first ask questions later…How’s that any different from what SDPD does currently? π
October 6, 2010 at 7:14 AM #613221CoronitaParticipantI don’t know why all the negativity about a private security or firefighting squad.
Maybe the answer is a for-profit fire department in which folks pay monthly dues (kinda like insurance)…Of course there should be an option to “opt-out” of paying a portion of taxes to fund the public version…
As far as “you get what you pay for” in terms of police. I wonder with the true costs of having beat police versus funding the pensions. (don’t know)…I don’t know but, seems to me that I wouldn’t mind hiring blackwater to be my private security guard if it was affordable….Shoot first ask questions later…How’s that any different from what SDPD does currently? π
October 6, 2010 at 7:14 AM #613773CoronitaParticipantI don’t know why all the negativity about a private security or firefighting squad.
Maybe the answer is a for-profit fire department in which folks pay monthly dues (kinda like insurance)…Of course there should be an option to “opt-out” of paying a portion of taxes to fund the public version…
As far as “you get what you pay for” in terms of police. I wonder with the true costs of having beat police versus funding the pensions. (don’t know)…I don’t know but, seems to me that I wouldn’t mind hiring blackwater to be my private security guard if it was affordable….Shoot first ask questions later…How’s that any different from what SDPD does currently? π
October 6, 2010 at 7:14 AM #613890CoronitaParticipantI don’t know why all the negativity about a private security or firefighting squad.
Maybe the answer is a for-profit fire department in which folks pay monthly dues (kinda like insurance)…Of course there should be an option to “opt-out” of paying a portion of taxes to fund the public version…
As far as “you get what you pay for” in terms of police. I wonder with the true costs of having beat police versus funding the pensions. (don’t know)…I don’t know but, seems to me that I wouldn’t mind hiring blackwater to be my private security guard if it was affordable….Shoot first ask questions later…How’s that any different from what SDPD does currently? π
October 6, 2010 at 7:14 AM #614195CoronitaParticipantI don’t know why all the negativity about a private security or firefighting squad.
Maybe the answer is a for-profit fire department in which folks pay monthly dues (kinda like insurance)…Of course there should be an option to “opt-out” of paying a portion of taxes to fund the public version…
As far as “you get what you pay for” in terms of police. I wonder with the true costs of having beat police versus funding the pensions. (don’t know)…I don’t know but, seems to me that I wouldn’t mind hiring blackwater to be my private security guard if it was affordable….Shoot first ask questions later…How’s that any different from what SDPD does currently? π
October 6, 2010 at 7:39 AM #613144jstoeszParticipantThe reason for Blackwater was not because it was to save money. The reason for private security forces was because the government could not adequately and in a timely manner respond to the needs of the contractors. So, instead of wait for the marines to show up and provide security for their operation, they hired a firm who was directly under their control.
We have a great military, but nimble it is not.
October 6, 2010 at 7:39 AM #613231jstoeszParticipantThe reason for Blackwater was not because it was to save money. The reason for private security forces was because the government could not adequately and in a timely manner respond to the needs of the contractors. So, instead of wait for the marines to show up and provide security for their operation, they hired a firm who was directly under their control.
We have a great military, but nimble it is not.
October 6, 2010 at 7:39 AM #613783jstoeszParticipantThe reason for Blackwater was not because it was to save money. The reason for private security forces was because the government could not adequately and in a timely manner respond to the needs of the contractors. So, instead of wait for the marines to show up and provide security for their operation, they hired a firm who was directly under their control.
We have a great military, but nimble it is not.
October 6, 2010 at 7:39 AM #613899jstoeszParticipantThe reason for Blackwater was not because it was to save money. The reason for private security forces was because the government could not adequately and in a timely manner respond to the needs of the contractors. So, instead of wait for the marines to show up and provide security for their operation, they hired a firm who was directly under their control.
We have a great military, but nimble it is not.
October 6, 2010 at 7:39 AM #614205jstoeszParticipantThe reason for Blackwater was not because it was to save money. The reason for private security forces was because the government could not adequately and in a timely manner respond to the needs of the contractors. So, instead of wait for the marines to show up and provide security for their operation, they hired a firm who was directly under their control.
We have a great military, but nimble it is not.
October 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM #613149jstoeszParticipantAs to the privatize debate with regards to the city, I would tell you to talk to any paramedic. Ask him if he would rather work for a private ambulance service (very common) or a firehouse…
I guarantee we are losing money with the public medics.
October 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM #613236jstoeszParticipantAs to the privatize debate with regards to the city, I would tell you to talk to any paramedic. Ask him if he would rather work for a private ambulance service (very common) or a firehouse…
I guarantee we are losing money with the public medics.
October 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM #613788jstoeszParticipantAs to the privatize debate with regards to the city, I would tell you to talk to any paramedic. Ask him if he would rather work for a private ambulance service (very common) or a firehouse…
I guarantee we are losing money with the public medics.
October 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM #613904jstoeszParticipantAs to the privatize debate with regards to the city, I would tell you to talk to any paramedic. Ask him if he would rather work for a private ambulance service (very common) or a firehouse…
I guarantee we are losing money with the public medics.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.