“The Little Hoover Commission’s guiding principle is that public pensions should be restored to the original role of providing for an adequate and humane lifestyle after retirement, not for creating wealth for a few at the expense of all Californians. It’s the right course. Turning the state into a hollowed-out shell is bad for everyone.”
What’s funny, paramount, is that I don’t disagree with anything written there, with the one exception of raising the retirement age for public safety workers to 60. Most of them cannot work past 55 because of the nature of their work. OTOH, I’ve said time and time again, that the 3% formula for their retirement is too generous.
What’s funny, paramount, is that I don’t disagree with anything written there, with the one exception of raising the retirement age for public safety workers to 60. Most of them cannot work past 55 because of the nature of their work. OTOH, I’ve said time and time again, that the 3% formula for their retirement is too generous.
What’s funny, paramount, is that I don’t disagree with anything written there, with the one exception of raising the retirement age for public safety workers to 60. Most of them cannot work past 55 because of the nature of their work. OTOH, I’ve said time and time again, that the 3% formula for their retirement is too generous.
What’s funny, paramount, is that I don’t disagree with anything written there, with the one exception of raising the retirement age for public safety workers to 60. Most of them cannot work past 55 because of the nature of their work. OTOH, I’ve said time and time again, that the 3% formula for their retirement is too generous.
What’s funny, paramount, is that I don’t disagree with anything written there, with the one exception of raising the retirement age for public safety workers to 60. Most of them cannot work past 55 because of the nature of their work. OTOH, I’ve said time and time again, that the 3% formula for their retirement is too generous.
.
