- This topic has 706 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2016 at 5:17 PM #803179November 7, 2016 at 5:25 PM #803180bearishgurlParticipant
[quote=FlyerInHi]BG, you gonna to be very dissapointed.
Tomorrow, I’m hosting a little election watch party at my apartment. We’re going to have global elite fare — champagne, caviar, sushi. maybe a papaya shrimp salad… You know, the same stuff Trump serves at his super model parties.[/quote]
Umm . . .
Methinks that FIH/brian (our “in-house transplant” from SD to LV) has been living in a self-imposed “condo bubble.” He seems to be blissfully unaware what is actually going on amongst the masses of the “unwashed deplorables” in the streets of his esteemed (adopted) city and county :=0
November 7, 2016 at 5:48 PM #803182AnonymousGuestThe Confirmation Bias Bus Tour sounds like so much fun.
November 7, 2016 at 7:02 PM #803183FlyerInHiGuestNV will go for Hillary. Early Hispanic voting is strongest ever.
I’ve been following NV closely. We’ll the answer tomorrow.BG, you know what they say about computers… garbage in, garbage out. Will you reprogram your computer if you’re proven wrong? I will reprogram mine if I’m wrong.
November 7, 2016 at 9:12 PM #803187svelteParticipantI’ve been following the swing states pretty carefully too, and here is my prediction:
FL – Clinton
OH – Trump
PA – Clinton
MI – Clinton
NH – ? very unclear to me
NC – Trump
NV – Clinton
WI – Clinton
IA – Trump
VA – Clinton
ME – Clinton
AZ – Trump
CO – Clinton
NM – ClintonA couple of those predictions go against current polling, but mail-in ballot stats influenced my prediction (mainly NV and FL).
And so it goes.
In mere hours, we’ll know if we’re led by Clown 1 or Clown 2.
November 7, 2016 at 9:25 PM #803189ltsdddParticipantIf Clinton takes FL then it’s pretty much over and NH is inconsequential. On the other hand if FL goes to trump, the election may come down to the 4 votes from NH.
November 8, 2016 at 9:42 AM #803210(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantThe BG trip with CA deplorables going to NV campaign reminded me of something …
What the hell is Bernie Sanders doing all over billboards in California promoting a proposition in California that impacts Californians.
Did he move here or is he just getting paid as a spokeman ?
November 8, 2016 at 1:08 PM #803216ucodegenParticipantOne prediction I can give on the election, is that voter turnout will be higher than normal. I saw the election rolls of voters and there were many mail-ins listed on the rolls, many many many more than I have ever seen. The polls where I went to before lunch were not that busy, particularly when compared to the registrar’s lines.
As for accuracy of polls – it should be interesting. A group of voters that normally doesn’t participate seems to be voting. Which group that is – I can’t tell. It may split evenly along party lines — or not.
November 15, 2016 at 12:25 AM #803668temeculaguyParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Kinda early for predictions but i say trump wins primary and election based on the current situation. He is in the lead and has the experts baffled without spending much.
Here’s the rub fellow piggs, most Americans hate politicians and know they are being lied to. Trump may say offensive or even stupid things but even the stupid things feel more genuine than the others. I liked Kasich for his healthcare, Christie for numerous reasons and Rubio for many other reasons. But honestly my favorites were Fiorina and the Doc because they weren’t politicians. Trump is another animal altogether, he says what people think, but afraid to say it. Voting is private, polls aren’t. My thoughts are Trump beats the polls and the polls are in his favor.
Evil as it may seem, after San Bernadino, I saw cair on TV and was sick to my stomach, then saw Obama (who I voted for twice) and was sick again. Cair should be on TV snitching off anyone who even looks radicalized.
This site is a collections of intellectuals and economics geeks, but do not for a minute think we are a majority. Plus Hillary will lose the female vote, I know no women who like her. She stayed with a man that cheated more than a professional cyclist just for public opinion, that will bite her. Funny thing is, I voted for him too, twice, but I have no respect for a woman who stayed with him, he deserved to be an alimony payer despite his attributes.[/quote]
Wow, once again i failed to place a bet in vegas or buy a stock. At some point I will trust my own analysis.
November 15, 2016 at 9:44 AM #803672FlyerInHiGuestThat was a good call temecula guy.
I think i have a pretty good pulse of the country. But I missed the disaffection in the industrial east/Midwest.
What you said is true and affected Florida where the the old folks voted for Trump. But in California and new-economy cities and states such as Colorado, Virginia, Nevada, Dallas County, even AZ, economics and demographics overcame the Trump factors.
Despite her shortcomings, Hillary did better than Obama in Georgia, Texas, Arizona, and of course California. I think that Trump is the last stand of the old guard.
November 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM #803677bearishgurlParticipantWell temeculaguy, if you’re reading this thread, it appears you called the 2016 presidential election early on. I did also, but not as early as you, cuz I wasn’t really paying attention to it until the end of Feb 2016.
However, you didn’t stick around to “take the heat” from our resident passel of vocal, ultra-lib Piggs . . . simply for supporting Trump’s candidacy. Sorry you missed out on that :=0
I would surmise that if I were as busy as you are, I wouldn’t have stuck around here, either :=]
November 15, 2016 at 12:25 PM #803676bearishgurlParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi]That was a good call temecula guy.
I think i have a pretty good pulse of the country. But I missed the disaffection in the industrial east/Midwest.
What you said is true and affected Florida where the the old folks voted for Trump. But in California and new-economy cities and states such as Colorado, Virginia, Nevada, Dallas County, even AZ, economics and demographics overcame the Trump factors.
Despite her shortcomings, Hillary did better than Obama in Georgia, Texas, Arizona, and of course California. I think that Trump is the last stand of the old guard.[/quote]Um, FIH?? Not sure where you are getting your info from but Trump WON all those states but CA … and CO, where he lost by 2.8%. It doesn’t matter what happened in the election (and re-election) of Obama. He is on his way out and so is most of his “legacy.” And Trump would have won CO but for (mostly) “progressive” millenials moving in its most populous counties (with JOBS) since the legalization of MJ (1/1/14) and registering to vote. The exceptions were El Paso (county seat: CO Sprs, which has a high “evangelical” population) and Weld (county seat: Greeley, which has a very high illegal immigrant population which has been stretching the gratuitousness of local charities there for decades). Those two populous counties voted Trump. HRC only won Pueblo County by .2% (199 votes), which is heavily (majority?) Latino and where the bulk of legal MJ is cultivated! CO has the possibility of reverting back to red in the next election cycle.
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/colorado/
The reasons are because CO state and local gubments are beyond fed up with the cost of “policing” the sales and use of recreational MJ, in spite of the public coffers its 35% + “sales tax” brings in. The law also created drivers on (often icy) mountainous roads who were impaired and a danger to everyone, sometimes heavily so and also mostly uninsured or relying on Medicaid.
The truth is, new incoming millenials just starting out have been priced out of rent in CO’s blue counties (the counties with CU/CSU and most of the good jobs) for almost 10 years now. Only the well-established boomers from states with higher-priced housing can afford to “retire” in CO and often not even in the county of their choice due to prohibitive cost so they better hurry. Rent and RE prices in most of CO are higher than most of CA except within the priciest coastal enclaves. The areas with cheaper rent/RE prices in the Denver metro area are trailer-park-like transient h@llholes which have beat cops parked on every corner and are an onerous commute to major job centers (especially in the winter). For these reasons, millenials who have not doubled and tripled up in a house/unit with a long term lease that they can live with (or are part of a dual-income couple, BOTH permanently gainfully employed FT) are not going to be able to make it long-term in the Denver area, Boulder County or Larimer County (county seat: Ft Collins).
Once this shift takes place in CO (millenials leave for the likes of [more affordable] KS City and the boomers move in while the getting is good), CO will revert back to red and vote to repeal their short-sighted law to legalize recreational MJ.
I’m intimately familiar with all four corners of CO and everything in between, having lived there for ~10 years in my youth (which was a lo-o-o-o-ong time ago :=0) and making 1-4 road trips through CO nearly every year since then. I’ve spent 35 days there in the last five years in the rockies alone. I was last in CO 2.5 months ago, staying for 6 nights in 3 different counties. I have a full and complete understanding of its people, its culture and the (often stark) differences between its counties.
November 15, 2016 at 1:07 PM #803681FlyerInHiGuestBG, it does matter that Hillary did better than Obama in new-economy states.
The old economy turned against Hillary out of misplaced hopey changey to the old days.Florida (old republican retirees) and the blue wall old-economy delivered a win for Trump.
The fact that Hillary was not inspiring but carried CO speaks volumes to Trump not being able to overcome new-economy demographics.
Show me where I’m wrong…. and BTW, who did your millennial kids vote for?
November 15, 2016 at 1:09 PM #803683njtosdParticipant[quote=FlyerInHi] I think that Trump is the last stand of the old guard.[/quote]
According to Pew Research:
Clinton received a lower share of the vote among young voters (ages 18-29) than Obama received in 2012 or 2008. Young adults preferred Clinton over Trump by a wide 55%-37% margin; by comparison, Obama had a 60%-36% advantage over Romney in 2012 and a 66%-32% advantage over McCain in 2008.
At least according to these date, the Democrats are losing ground among the 18 – 29 age group and Republicans are gaining.
November 15, 2016 at 1:52 PM #803690FlyerInHiGuestHillary got lower overall turnout among the young because young people don’t vote unless the candidate is inspirational. If you want to believe that republicans are gaining, then so be it.
But Hillary did proportionally better than 2012 Obama in new-economy states and metropolitan areas
Southern California is new economy. You may support Trump but you’re not in the majority. The people you talk to don’t reflect where you live.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.