- This topic has 1,381 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by
Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 12, 2008 at 5:13 PM #256453August 12, 2008 at 5:13 PM #256501
tc
ParticipantHey cant you guys argue on another forum topic. Im tired of seeing this headline. I mean really look at the state of things. God save us all from electing McCain.
August 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM #256219jficquette
ParticipantZK,
Ok, thank you. You are simplying telling me that you believe he is eligible because he is running for President. Great.
Why the attacks and name calling on Texasdarlin? That really gets me about liberals. Not saying you are one. I am just saying that if liberals can’t present something concrete they resort to name calling.
Thanks,
John
August 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM #256401ParticipantZK,
Ok, thank you. You are simplying telling me that you believe he is eligible because he is running for President. Great.
Why the attacks and name calling on Texasdarlin? That really gets me about liberals. Not saying you are one. I am just saying that if liberals can’t present something concrete they resort to name calling.
Thanks,
John
August 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM #256407ParticipantZK,
Ok, thank you. You are simplying telling me that you believe he is eligible because he is running for President. Great.
Why the attacks and name calling on Texasdarlin? That really gets me about liberals. Not saying you are one. I am just saying that if liberals can’t present something concrete they resort to name calling.
Thanks,
John
August 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM #256463ParticipantZK,
Ok, thank you. You are simplying telling me that you believe he is eligible because he is running for President. Great.
Why the attacks and name calling on Texasdarlin? That really gets me about liberals. Not saying you are one. I am just saying that if liberals can’t present something concrete they resort to name calling.
Thanks,
John
August 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM #256512ParticipantZK,
Ok, thank you. You are simplying telling me that you believe he is eligible because he is running for President. Great.
Why the attacks and name calling on Texasdarlin? That really gets me about liberals. Not saying you are one. I am just saying that if liberals can’t present something concrete they resort to name calling.
Thanks,
John
August 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM #256224gandalf
ParticipantI agree with dukehorn. And Henry Rollins. Never relent.
jfiq, you seem to be rather caught up on the notion that Obama isn’t ‘American’ enough. What are your thoughts regarding McCain’s eligibility for the Presidency?
* * *
“A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue”
By ADAM LIPTAK
New York Times, July 11, 2008In the most detailed examination yet of Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be president, a law professor at the University of Arizona has concluded that neither Mr. McCain’s birth in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone nor the fact that his parents were American citizens is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural-born citizen.”
The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
* * *
Constitution is explicit. You must be 35 years of age and a natural born citizen. Frankly, I’m okay with either becoming President. I’m interested in hearing whether you discuss the issue fairly or shill for McCain…
August 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM #256406ParticipantI agree with dukehorn. And Henry Rollins. Never relent.
jfiq, you seem to be rather caught up on the notion that Obama isn’t ‘American’ enough. What are your thoughts regarding McCain’s eligibility for the Presidency?
* * *
“A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue”
By ADAM LIPTAK
New York Times, July 11, 2008In the most detailed examination yet of Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be president, a law professor at the University of Arizona has concluded that neither Mr. McCain’s birth in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone nor the fact that his parents were American citizens is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural-born citizen.”
The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
* * *
Constitution is explicit. You must be 35 years of age and a natural born citizen. Frankly, I’m okay with either becoming President. I’m interested in hearing whether you discuss the issue fairly or shill for McCain…
August 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM #256412ParticipantI agree with dukehorn. And Henry Rollins. Never relent.
jfiq, you seem to be rather caught up on the notion that Obama isn’t ‘American’ enough. What are your thoughts regarding McCain’s eligibility for the Presidency?
* * *
“A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue”
By ADAM LIPTAK
New York Times, July 11, 2008In the most detailed examination yet of Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be president, a law professor at the University of Arizona has concluded that neither Mr. McCain’s birth in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone nor the fact that his parents were American citizens is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural-born citizen.”
The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
* * *
Constitution is explicit. You must be 35 years of age and a natural born citizen. Frankly, I’m okay with either becoming President. I’m interested in hearing whether you discuss the issue fairly or shill for McCain…
August 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM #256468ParticipantI agree with dukehorn. And Henry Rollins. Never relent.
jfiq, you seem to be rather caught up on the notion that Obama isn’t ‘American’ enough. What are your thoughts regarding McCain’s eligibility for the Presidency?
* * *
“A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue”
By ADAM LIPTAK
New York Times, July 11, 2008In the most detailed examination yet of Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be president, a law professor at the University of Arizona has concluded that neither Mr. McCain’s birth in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone nor the fact that his parents were American citizens is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural-born citizen.”
The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
* * *
Constitution is explicit. You must be 35 years of age and a natural born citizen. Frankly, I’m okay with either becoming President. I’m interested in hearing whether you discuss the issue fairly or shill for McCain…
August 12, 2008 at 6:15 PM #256516ParticipantI agree with dukehorn. And Henry Rollins. Never relent.
jfiq, you seem to be rather caught up on the notion that Obama isn’t ‘American’ enough. What are your thoughts regarding McCain’s eligibility for the Presidency?
* * *
“A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue”
By ADAM LIPTAK
New York Times, July 11, 2008In the most detailed examination yet of Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be president, a law professor at the University of Arizona has concluded that neither Mr. McCain’s birth in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone nor the fact that his parents were American citizens is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural-born citizen.”
The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
* * *
Constitution is explicit. You must be 35 years of age and a natural born citizen. Frankly, I’m okay with either becoming President. I’m interested in hearing whether you discuss the issue fairly or shill for McCain…
August 12, 2008 at 6:17 PM #256234ParticipantIf McCain isn’t eligble then he shouldn’t be president. I don’t care who it is.
Out of 15 million federal employees you would think that somewhere there is one poor soul who is suppose to determine if candidates who filed for election are eligible to hold office.
John
August 12, 2008 at 6:17 PM #256416ParticipantIf McCain isn’t eligble then he shouldn’t be president. I don’t care who it is.
Out of 15 million federal employees you would think that somewhere there is one poor soul who is suppose to determine if candidates who filed for election are eligible to hold office.
John
August 12, 2008 at 6:17 PM #256422ParticipantIf McCain isn’t eligble then he shouldn’t be president. I don’t care who it is.
Out of 15 million federal employees you would think that somewhere there is one poor soul who is suppose to determine if candidates who filed for election are eligible to hold office.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.