- This topic has 255 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by ocrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 8, 2008 at 12:59 AM #13768September 8, 2008 at 1:31 AM #267549EugeneParticipant
If Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.
September 8, 2008 at 1:31 AM #267770EugeneParticipantIf Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.
September 8, 2008 at 1:31 AM #267785EugeneParticipantIf Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.
September 8, 2008 at 1:31 AM #267833EugeneParticipantIf Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.
September 8, 2008 at 1:31 AM #267862EugeneParticipantIf Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.
September 8, 2008 at 2:34 AM #267559Mark HolmesParticipant[quote=esmith]If Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.[/quote]
I second that. Although if you go to pollster.com and look at the electoral map, it’s hard to envision that happening. But it could…
……..how cold is Canada? It can’t be that bad….
September 8, 2008 at 2:34 AM #267779Mark HolmesParticipant[quote=esmith]If Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.[/quote]
I second that. Although if you go to pollster.com and look at the electoral map, it’s hard to envision that happening. But it could…
……..how cold is Canada? It can’t be that bad….
September 8, 2008 at 2:34 AM #267794Mark HolmesParticipant[quote=esmith]If Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.[/quote]
I second that. Although if you go to pollster.com and look at the electoral map, it’s hard to envision that happening. But it could…
……..how cold is Canada? It can’t be that bad….
September 8, 2008 at 2:34 AM #267843Mark HolmesParticipant[quote=esmith]If Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.[/quote]
I second that. Although if you go to pollster.com and look at the electoral map, it’s hard to envision that happening. But it could…
……..how cold is Canada? It can’t be that bad….
September 8, 2008 at 2:34 AM #267872Mark HolmesParticipant[quote=esmith]If Americans somehow manage to choose a pro-life creationist global warming denier for a president, AGAIN, I’m moving to Canada.[/quote]
I second that. Although if you go to pollster.com and look at the electoral map, it’s hard to envision that happening. But it could…
……..how cold is Canada? It can’t be that bad….
September 8, 2008 at 7:06 AM #267579Ex-SDParticipantThis election could go either way. I don’t think that either candidate is going to run away with a big majority of votes. McCain is banking on Palin bolstering the vote from women and blue collar workers. If he’s correct, he would pick up enough extra votes in the swing states that could win the Presidency for him.
IMO: A win for either candidate means absolutely nothing positive for the future of America…………………..just more of same of bullshit, feel-good platitudes and rhetoric that we’ve come accustomed to with politics. Good business people (like Romney) or people with solid ideas (like Ron Paul) will never make it to the Presidency because the majority of people will vote like sheeple and pick slick-talking bull-shitter’s over solid candidates, every time.
September 8, 2008 at 7:06 AM #267799Ex-SDParticipantThis election could go either way. I don’t think that either candidate is going to run away with a big majority of votes. McCain is banking on Palin bolstering the vote from women and blue collar workers. If he’s correct, he would pick up enough extra votes in the swing states that could win the Presidency for him.
IMO: A win for either candidate means absolutely nothing positive for the future of America…………………..just more of same of bullshit, feel-good platitudes and rhetoric that we’ve come accustomed to with politics. Good business people (like Romney) or people with solid ideas (like Ron Paul) will never make it to the Presidency because the majority of people will vote like sheeple and pick slick-talking bull-shitter’s over solid candidates, every time.
September 8, 2008 at 7:06 AM #267814Ex-SDParticipantThis election could go either way. I don’t think that either candidate is going to run away with a big majority of votes. McCain is banking on Palin bolstering the vote from women and blue collar workers. If he’s correct, he would pick up enough extra votes in the swing states that could win the Presidency for him.
IMO: A win for either candidate means absolutely nothing positive for the future of America…………………..just more of same of bullshit, feel-good platitudes and rhetoric that we’ve come accustomed to with politics. Good business people (like Romney) or people with solid ideas (like Ron Paul) will never make it to the Presidency because the majority of people will vote like sheeple and pick slick-talking bull-shitter’s over solid candidates, every time.
September 8, 2008 at 7:06 AM #267863Ex-SDParticipantThis election could go either way. I don’t think that either candidate is going to run away with a big majority of votes. McCain is banking on Palin bolstering the vote from women and blue collar workers. If he’s correct, he would pick up enough extra votes in the swing states that could win the Presidency for him.
IMO: A win for either candidate means absolutely nothing positive for the future of America…………………..just more of same of bullshit, feel-good platitudes and rhetoric that we’ve come accustomed to with politics. Good business people (like Romney) or people with solid ideas (like Ron Paul) will never make it to the Presidency because the majority of people will vote like sheeple and pick slick-talking bull-shitter’s over solid candidates, every time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.