- This topic has 155 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 7, 2010 at 8:04 PM #637704December 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM #636627bearishgurlParticipant
[quote=AN]BG, go here to see the proposal: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/home.aspx
[/quote]Thanx, AN. I’ll take a look at this. From your link, I see a separate “Authority” has been created for the proposed light-rail project (NOT CALTRANS).
“High Speed Rail Authority” tax-free bonds, anyone??
I’m a frequent road traveler of nearly every CA county!
This is exactly what CA needs to get back on the map of places to do business!
December 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM #636701bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN]BG, go here to see the proposal: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/home.aspx
[/quote]Thanx, AN. I’ll take a look at this. From your link, I see a separate “Authority” has been created for the proposed light-rail project (NOT CALTRANS).
“High Speed Rail Authority” tax-free bonds, anyone??
I’m a frequent road traveler of nearly every CA county!
This is exactly what CA needs to get back on the map of places to do business!
December 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM #637279bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN]BG, go here to see the proposal: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/home.aspx
[/quote]Thanx, AN. I’ll take a look at this. From your link, I see a separate “Authority” has been created for the proposed light-rail project (NOT CALTRANS).
“High Speed Rail Authority” tax-free bonds, anyone??
I’m a frequent road traveler of nearly every CA county!
This is exactly what CA needs to get back on the map of places to do business!
December 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM #637412bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN]BG, go here to see the proposal: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/home.aspx
[/quote]Thanx, AN. I’ll take a look at this. From your link, I see a separate “Authority” has been created for the proposed light-rail project (NOT CALTRANS).
“High Speed Rail Authority” tax-free bonds, anyone??
I’m a frequent road traveler of nearly every CA county!
This is exactly what CA needs to get back on the map of places to do business!
December 7, 2010 at 8:33 PM #637729bearishgurlParticipant[quote=AN]BG, go here to see the proposal: http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/home.aspx
[/quote]Thanx, AN. I’ll take a look at this. From your link, I see a separate “Authority” has been created for the proposed light-rail project (NOT CALTRANS).
“High Speed Rail Authority” tax-free bonds, anyone??
I’m a frequent road traveler of nearly every CA county!
This is exactly what CA needs to get back on the map of places to do business!
December 7, 2010 at 9:19 PM #636657bearishgurlParticipantI just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol!
December 7, 2010 at 9:19 PM #636731bearishgurlParticipantI just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol!
December 7, 2010 at 9:19 PM #637309bearishgurlParticipantI just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol!
December 7, 2010 at 9:19 PM #637442bearishgurlParticipantI just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol!
December 7, 2010 at 9:19 PM #637759bearishgurlParticipantI just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol!
December 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM #636697anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]I just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol![/quote]
IF this actually goes through, the whole thing won’t be complete for another 20-30 years. There is talk of the project being canned due to not enough ridership based on the projection.December 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM #636771anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]I just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol![/quote]
IF this actually goes through, the whole thing won’t be complete for another 20-30 years. There is talk of the project being canned due to not enough ridership based on the projection.December 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM #637349anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]I just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol![/quote]
IF this actually goes through, the whole thing won’t be complete for another 20-30 years. There is talk of the project being canned due to not enough ridership based on the projection.December 7, 2010 at 10:04 PM #637482anParticipant[quote=bearishgurl]I just watched the the CA HSR videos and all I can say is, WOW!!
I wouldn’t have envisioned the SR-152 route from Merced (over Pacheco Pass/Reservoir and alongside the San Luis Reservoir) to Gilroy, cuz it seemed too complicated to do. But I see where the inner part of the peninsula (just west of I-280 along the bayfront) is used as tracks thru the Silicon Valley. This seems totally doable.
Luv it.
Just incredible. Hope I live long enough to ride it all . . . regularly, lol![/quote]
IF this actually goes through, the whole thing won’t be complete for another 20-30 years. There is talk of the project being canned due to not enough ridership based on the projection. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.