- This topic has 195 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 1, 2009 at 9:31 PM #16285September 2, 2009 at 7:14 AM #451767svelteParticipant
great post equalizer!
And good info you found…I hadn’t read about the 3-second requirement yet.
Back in the Audi problem days, I could never decide if it was driver error or not. Now that we have the victim being an experienced police officer who specialized in vehicle safety inspections, I leaned towards blaming Toyota and Lexus. Officer Saylor would surely know all the tricks in getting a runaway vehicle to stop, and I have no doubt he tried them all.
After reading about the floor mat recall and the 3-second button, I think Toyota clearly has another defective product.
My heart goes out to the Saylor family.
September 2, 2009 at 7:14 AM #451962svelteParticipantgreat post equalizer!
And good info you found…I hadn’t read about the 3-second requirement yet.
Back in the Audi problem days, I could never decide if it was driver error or not. Now that we have the victim being an experienced police officer who specialized in vehicle safety inspections, I leaned towards blaming Toyota and Lexus. Officer Saylor would surely know all the tricks in getting a runaway vehicle to stop, and I have no doubt he tried them all.
After reading about the floor mat recall and the 3-second button, I think Toyota clearly has another defective product.
My heart goes out to the Saylor family.
September 2, 2009 at 7:14 AM #452302svelteParticipantgreat post equalizer!
And good info you found…I hadn’t read about the 3-second requirement yet.
Back in the Audi problem days, I could never decide if it was driver error or not. Now that we have the victim being an experienced police officer who specialized in vehicle safety inspections, I leaned towards blaming Toyota and Lexus. Officer Saylor would surely know all the tricks in getting a runaway vehicle to stop, and I have no doubt he tried them all.
After reading about the floor mat recall and the 3-second button, I think Toyota clearly has another defective product.
My heart goes out to the Saylor family.
September 2, 2009 at 7:14 AM #452376svelteParticipantgreat post equalizer!
And good info you found…I hadn’t read about the 3-second requirement yet.
Back in the Audi problem days, I could never decide if it was driver error or not. Now that we have the victim being an experienced police officer who specialized in vehicle safety inspections, I leaned towards blaming Toyota and Lexus. Officer Saylor would surely know all the tricks in getting a runaway vehicle to stop, and I have no doubt he tried them all.
After reading about the floor mat recall and the 3-second button, I think Toyota clearly has another defective product.
My heart goes out to the Saylor family.
September 2, 2009 at 7:14 AM #452565svelteParticipantgreat post equalizer!
And good info you found…I hadn’t read about the 3-second requirement yet.
Back in the Audi problem days, I could never decide if it was driver error or not. Now that we have the victim being an experienced police officer who specialized in vehicle safety inspections, I leaned towards blaming Toyota and Lexus. Officer Saylor would surely know all the tricks in getting a runaway vehicle to stop, and I have no doubt he tried them all.
After reading about the floor mat recall and the 3-second button, I think Toyota clearly has another defective product.
My heart goes out to the Saylor family.
September 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM #451893ZeitgeistParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.September 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM #452088ZeitgeistParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.September 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM #452428ZeitgeistParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.September 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM #452501ZeitgeistParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.September 2, 2009 at 11:44 AM #452690ZeitgeistParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.September 2, 2009 at 12:00 PM #451903ucodegenParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.Generally yes. Depends upon how much ‘drive/fly by wire’ the car is. If the same system controls the auto transmission, it may not work if it is ‘confused’. See my earlier comment, method #3. Turning off the engine and then turning back on but not going to ‘start’ (and not touching start/stop button) will cause ECU to restart, possibly clearing problem. If you turn engine off, move autotrans to neutral and then go back to on (but not start or hitting start/stop) it should reset ECU and the engine won’t restart.
September 2, 2009 at 12:00 PM #452098ucodegenParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.Generally yes. Depends upon how much ‘drive/fly by wire’ the car is. If the same system controls the auto transmission, it may not work if it is ‘confused’. See my earlier comment, method #3. Turning off the engine and then turning back on but not going to ‘start’ (and not touching start/stop button) will cause ECU to restart, possibly clearing problem. If you turn engine off, move autotrans to neutral and then go back to on (but not start or hitting start/stop) it should reset ECU and the engine won’t restart.
September 2, 2009 at 12:00 PM #452438ucodegenParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.Generally yes. Depends upon how much ‘drive/fly by wire’ the car is. If the same system controls the auto transmission, it may not work if it is ‘confused’. See my earlier comment, method #3. Turning off the engine and then turning back on but not going to ‘start’ (and not touching start/stop button) will cause ECU to restart, possibly clearing problem. If you turn engine off, move autotrans to neutral and then go back to on (but not start or hitting start/stop) it should reset ECU and the engine won’t restart.
September 2, 2009 at 12:00 PM #452511ucodegenParticipantFlu and other auto experts-
Would shifting it into neutral and braking have stopped the engine? Just thinking out loud.Generally yes. Depends upon how much ‘drive/fly by wire’ the car is. If the same system controls the auto transmission, it may not work if it is ‘confused’. See my earlier comment, method #3. Turning off the engine and then turning back on but not going to ‘start’ (and not touching start/stop button) will cause ECU to restart, possibly clearing problem. If you turn engine off, move autotrans to neutral and then go back to on (but not start or hitting start/stop) it should reset ECU and the engine won’t restart.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.