- This topic has 280 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM #655102January 14, 2011 at 10:43 PM #654172enron_by_the_seaParticipant
Otellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”
January 14, 2011 at 10:43 PM #654237enron_by_the_seaParticipantOtellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”
January 14, 2011 at 10:43 PM #654825enron_by_the_seaParticipantOtellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”
January 14, 2011 at 10:43 PM #654963enron_by_the_seaParticipantOtellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”
January 14, 2011 at 10:43 PM #655293enron_by_the_seaParticipantOtellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”
January 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM #654276CoronitaParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Otellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”[/quote]
Oh boy… I love this line
An example is ViewSonic’s Corp.’s ViewPad 10, which features an Atom processor and is capable of running Windows 7 or Android 1.6. The tablet is scheduled to be available in March.Wow…Well, phew I’m glad ViewSonic is planning to run Android 1.6 (aka Donut) on an Atom based tablet…..Too bad that Android 1.6 is like 3 generations behind…
It’s not even Android Eclair or for that matter Froyo. And definitely isn’t Gingerbread or Honeycomb for that matter. Who the hell is going to buy something 3 generations behind?
And like I predicted, Windoze Mobile 7 is turning out to be a flop…
And MeeGo who?
The issue I don’t think is ARM based processor moving into desktop/laptop/netbooks. I doubt that would happen…Because who wants to move into an already crowded, saturated, market. Otellini keeps deflecting the question asked about “what are you going to do in the mobile space with ARM dominating there”. Otellini keeps responding, “I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…January 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM #654339CoronitaParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Otellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”[/quote]
Oh boy… I love this line
An example is ViewSonic’s Corp.’s ViewPad 10, which features an Atom processor and is capable of running Windows 7 or Android 1.6. The tablet is scheduled to be available in March.Wow…Well, phew I’m glad ViewSonic is planning to run Android 1.6 (aka Donut) on an Atom based tablet…..Too bad that Android 1.6 is like 3 generations behind…
It’s not even Android Eclair or for that matter Froyo. And definitely isn’t Gingerbread or Honeycomb for that matter. Who the hell is going to buy something 3 generations behind?
And like I predicted, Windoze Mobile 7 is turning out to be a flop…
And MeeGo who?
The issue I don’t think is ARM based processor moving into desktop/laptop/netbooks. I doubt that would happen…Because who wants to move into an already crowded, saturated, market. Otellini keeps deflecting the question asked about “what are you going to do in the mobile space with ARM dominating there”. Otellini keeps responding, “I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…January 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM #654930CoronitaParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Otellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”[/quote]
Oh boy… I love this line
An example is ViewSonic’s Corp.’s ViewPad 10, which features an Atom processor and is capable of running Windows 7 or Android 1.6. The tablet is scheduled to be available in March.Wow…Well, phew I’m glad ViewSonic is planning to run Android 1.6 (aka Donut) on an Atom based tablet…..Too bad that Android 1.6 is like 3 generations behind…
It’s not even Android Eclair or for that matter Froyo. And definitely isn’t Gingerbread or Honeycomb for that matter. Who the hell is going to buy something 3 generations behind?
And like I predicted, Windoze Mobile 7 is turning out to be a flop…
And MeeGo who?
The issue I don’t think is ARM based processor moving into desktop/laptop/netbooks. I doubt that would happen…Because who wants to move into an already crowded, saturated, market. Otellini keeps deflecting the question asked about “what are you going to do in the mobile space with ARM dominating there”. Otellini keeps responding, “I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…January 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM #655068CoronitaParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Otellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”[/quote]
Oh boy… I love this line
An example is ViewSonic’s Corp.’s ViewPad 10, which features an Atom processor and is capable of running Windows 7 or Android 1.6. The tablet is scheduled to be available in March.Wow…Well, phew I’m glad ViewSonic is planning to run Android 1.6 (aka Donut) on an Atom based tablet…..Too bad that Android 1.6 is like 3 generations behind…
It’s not even Android Eclair or for that matter Froyo. And definitely isn’t Gingerbread or Honeycomb for that matter. Who the hell is going to buy something 3 generations behind?
And like I predicted, Windoze Mobile 7 is turning out to be a flop…
And MeeGo who?
The issue I don’t think is ARM based processor moving into desktop/laptop/netbooks. I doubt that would happen…Because who wants to move into an already crowded, saturated, market. Otellini keeps deflecting the question asked about “what are you going to do in the mobile space with ARM dominating there”. Otellini keeps responding, “I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…January 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM #655398CoronitaParticipant[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Otellini responds to flu –
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212204/Despite-skeptics–Intel-keeps-rolling-
So to paraphrase the other thread – “Will we be all safer if everyone were ARMed?”[/quote]
Oh boy… I love this line
An example is ViewSonic’s Corp.’s ViewPad 10, which features an Atom processor and is capable of running Windows 7 or Android 1.6. The tablet is scheduled to be available in March.Wow…Well, phew I’m glad ViewSonic is planning to run Android 1.6 (aka Donut) on an Atom based tablet…..Too bad that Android 1.6 is like 3 generations behind…
It’s not even Android Eclair or for that matter Froyo. And definitely isn’t Gingerbread or Honeycomb for that matter. Who the hell is going to buy something 3 generations behind?
And like I predicted, Windoze Mobile 7 is turning out to be a flop…
And MeeGo who?
The issue I don’t think is ARM based processor moving into desktop/laptop/netbooks. I doubt that would happen…Because who wants to move into an already crowded, saturated, market. Otellini keeps deflecting the question asked about “what are you going to do in the mobile space with ARM dominating there”. Otellini keeps responding, “I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…January 16, 2011 at 4:06 AM #654499EugeneParticipantIn the mean time, while flu complains that Intel is a dead fish, I went and bought one of their newest products. Namely, i5-2500k. This thing is a monster. Stable and under 60 C at full load at 4.6 GHz. From what I gather from overclocking forums and my own experience, virtually every single 2500k and 2600k can break the 5 GHz barrier, provided you have the cooling and you’re willing to risk a potential reduction in life (no one knows that last part for sure, so I’ll err on the side of caution and stay at 4.6.)
AMD, your move.
[quote]”I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…[/quote]Honestly, who cares about the embedded market? What is the profit margin on a typical mobile ARM CPU? 50 cents? A dollar? ARM market is heavily commoditized, it is a red-ocean market. The real money is in desktop CPUs, server CPUs, desktop and general-purpose GPUs. There we have a total of three major players, down from four a few years ago. These players make all the right moves to make it appear that the embedded market matters, but it really doesn’t.
January 16, 2011 at 4:06 AM #654561EugeneParticipantIn the mean time, while flu complains that Intel is a dead fish, I went and bought one of their newest products. Namely, i5-2500k. This thing is a monster. Stable and under 60 C at full load at 4.6 GHz. From what I gather from overclocking forums and my own experience, virtually every single 2500k and 2600k can break the 5 GHz barrier, provided you have the cooling and you’re willing to risk a potential reduction in life (no one knows that last part for sure, so I’ll err on the side of caution and stay at 4.6.)
AMD, your move.
[quote]”I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…[/quote]Honestly, who cares about the embedded market? What is the profit margin on a typical mobile ARM CPU? 50 cents? A dollar? ARM market is heavily commoditized, it is a red-ocean market. The real money is in desktop CPUs, server CPUs, desktop and general-purpose GPUs. There we have a total of three major players, down from four a few years ago. These players make all the right moves to make it appear that the embedded market matters, but it really doesn’t.
January 16, 2011 at 4:06 AM #655156EugeneParticipantIn the mean time, while flu complains that Intel is a dead fish, I went and bought one of their newest products. Namely, i5-2500k. This thing is a monster. Stable and under 60 C at full load at 4.6 GHz. From what I gather from overclocking forums and my own experience, virtually every single 2500k and 2600k can break the 5 GHz barrier, provided you have the cooling and you’re willing to risk a potential reduction in life (no one knows that last part for sure, so I’ll err on the side of caution and stay at 4.6.)
AMD, your move.
[quote]”I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…[/quote]Honestly, who cares about the embedded market? What is the profit margin on a typical mobile ARM CPU? 50 cents? A dollar? ARM market is heavily commoditized, it is a red-ocean market. The real money is in desktop CPUs, server CPUs, desktop and general-purpose GPUs. There we have a total of three major players, down from four a few years ago. These players make all the right moves to make it appear that the embedded market matters, but it really doesn’t.
January 16, 2011 at 4:06 AM #655294EugeneParticipantIn the mean time, while flu complains that Intel is a dead fish, I went and bought one of their newest products. Namely, i5-2500k. This thing is a monster. Stable and under 60 C at full load at 4.6 GHz. From what I gather from overclocking forums and my own experience, virtually every single 2500k and 2600k can break the 5 GHz barrier, provided you have the cooling and you’re willing to risk a potential reduction in life (no one knows that last part for sure, so I’ll err on the side of caution and stay at 4.6.)
AMD, your move.
[quote]”I doubt ARM will make inroads into the PC markets”…Hello, did you answer the first question? What are you going to do about the ARM-dominated mobile space? God I hope I’m wrong.
Someone please bring back Andy Grove from retirement…[/quote]Honestly, who cares about the embedded market? What is the profit margin on a typical mobile ARM CPU? 50 cents? A dollar? ARM market is heavily commoditized, it is a red-ocean market. The real money is in desktop CPUs, server CPUs, desktop and general-purpose GPUs. There we have a total of three major players, down from four a few years ago. These players make all the right moves to make it appear that the embedded market matters, but it really doesn’t.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.