- This topic has 420 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 22, 2009 at 7:58 AM #486141November 22, 2009 at 8:04 AM #485291
NotCranky
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
November 22, 2009 at 8:04 AM #485459NotCranky
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
November 22, 2009 at 8:04 AM #485832NotCranky
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
November 22, 2009 at 8:04 AM #485917NotCranky
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
November 22, 2009 at 8:04 AM #486146NotCranky
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
November 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM #485281SellingMyHome
Participantweird duplicate, sorry!
November 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM #485449SellingMyHome
Participantweird duplicate, sorry!
November 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM #485822SellingMyHome
Participantweird duplicate, sorry!
November 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM #485907SellingMyHome
Participantweird duplicate, sorry!
November 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM #486136SellingMyHome
Participantweird duplicate, sorry!
November 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM #485301meadandale
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
I was against the government giving money to the banks and I’m most certainly against the government giving money to people to pay their mortgages, many who behaved JUST AS RECKLESSLY as the banks.
I’m not an investor or banker…I’m a taxpayer…and a home owner that didn’t buy more house than I could afford with a risky loan. I haven’t taken money out of my house and I’m not up to my eyeballs in credit card or any other debt used to purchase a lifestyle I think I deserve but cannot afford.
November 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM #485469meadandale
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
I was against the government giving money to the banks and I’m most certainly against the government giving money to people to pay their mortgages, many who behaved JUST AS RECKLESSLY as the banks.
I’m not an investor or banker…I’m a taxpayer…and a home owner that didn’t buy more house than I could afford with a risky loan. I haven’t taken money out of my house and I’m not up to my eyeballs in credit card or any other debt used to purchase a lifestyle I think I deserve but cannot afford.
November 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM #485842meadandale
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
I was against the government giving money to the banks and I’m most certainly against the government giving money to people to pay their mortgages, many who behaved JUST AS RECKLESSLY as the banks.
I’m not an investor or banker…I’m a taxpayer…and a home owner that didn’t buy more house than I could afford with a risky loan. I haven’t taken money out of my house and I’m not up to my eyeballs in credit card or any other debt used to purchase a lifestyle I think I deserve but cannot afford.
November 22, 2009 at 8:24 AM #485927meadandale
Participant[quote=SellingMyHome]Why didn’t the government pay down our underwater house balances, that money could have gone to the banks. Instead, they gave the money straight to the banks to help pay for the paper losses caused by the badly packaged loans. Giving us the money would have been a win win situation, instead just the greedy banks win!
I’m starting to understand that a lot of people here must be investors or bankers.[/quote]
I was against the government giving money to the banks and I’m most certainly against the government giving money to people to pay their mortgages, many who behaved JUST AS RECKLESSLY as the banks.
I’m not an investor or banker…I’m a taxpayer…and a home owner that didn’t buy more house than I could afford with a risky loan. I haven’t taken money out of my house and I’m not up to my eyeballs in credit card or any other debt used to purchase a lifestyle I think I deserve but cannot afford.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.