OT – Home Grown Terrorism

[briansd1]

The disgruntled unemployed are those we need to worry about.

The neo-nazis and skinheads tend to come from among the ranks of the disgruntled unemployed.

Time will tell if the “socialist” krugman-esque bailout programs are successful at reviving the economy. If and when there is a big crash, the American jihadists will indeed come out in force.

Jihadism is all about economics and joblessness. Religion serves as a spark to light the fire. Misguided fervor then fuels the fire.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=paramount][quote=scaredycat]well, call em jihadists or whatever, but there could be a large mass of very disgruntled unemployed downt he pike.[/quote]

Oh, so now if your unemployed your a terrorist of some sort.

Man, you elitists really are jerks…[/quote]

Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News and Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.

If you read the article carefully, it notes that Brek is a gun owner, but a LEGAL gun owner (a constitutionally protected right). However, in the context of the article and juxtaposed with his political affiliation (Republican) and his “terroristic threats” (which we’re not privy to, and aren’t shown in the article), Brek suddenly becomes a well armed, foaming at the mouth, reactionary right winger (and “enemy of the state”).

All of this is very carefully orchestrated and done in such a way to chill free speech and muzzle dissent. Its also highly effective, so think carefully about what you say and do, because Big Brother is watching you.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=paramount][quote=scaredycat]well, call em jihadists or whatever, but there could be a large mass of very disgruntled unemployed downt he pike.[/quote]

Oh, so now if your unemployed your a terrorist of some sort.

Man, you elitists really are jerks…[/quote]

Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News and Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.

If you read the article carefully, it notes that Brek is a gun owner, but a LEGAL gun owner (a constitutionally protected right). However, in the context of the article and juxtaposed with his political affiliation (Republican) and his “terroristic threats” (which we’re not privy to, and aren’t shown in the article), Brek suddenly becomes a well armed, foaming at the mouth, reactionary right winger (and “enemy of the state”).

All of this is very carefully orchestrated and done in such a way to chill free speech and muzzle dissent. Its also highly effective, so think carefully about what you say and do, because Big Brother is watching you.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=paramount][quote=scaredycat]well, call em jihadists or whatever, but there could be a large mass of very disgruntled unemployed downt he pike.[/quote]

Oh, so now if your unemployed your a terrorist of some sort.

Man, you elitists really are jerks…[/quote]

Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News and Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.

If you read the article carefully, it notes that Brek is a gun owner, but a LEGAL gun owner (a constitutionally protected right). However, in the context of the article and juxtaposed with his political affiliation (Republican) and his “terroristic threats” (which we’re not privy to, and aren’t shown in the article), Brek suddenly becomes a well armed, foaming at the mouth, reactionary right winger (and “enemy of the state”).

All of this is very carefully orchestrated and done in such a way to chill free speech and muzzle dissent. Its also highly effective, so think carefully about what you say and do, because Big Brother is watching you.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=paramount][quote=scaredycat]well, call em jihadists or whatever, but there could be a large mass of very disgruntled unemployed downt he pike.[/quote]

Oh, so now if your unemployed your a terrorist of some sort.

Man, you elitists really are jerks…[/quote]

Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News and Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.

If you read the article carefully, it notes that Brek is a gun owner, but a LEGAL gun owner (a constitutionally protected right). However, in the context of the article and juxtaposed with his political affiliation (Republican) and his “terroristic threats” (which we’re not privy to, and aren’t shown in the article), Brek suddenly becomes a well armed, foaming at the mouth, reactionary right winger (and “enemy of the state”).

All of this is very carefully orchestrated and done in such a way to chill free speech and muzzle dissent. Its also highly effective, so think carefully about what you say and do, because Big Brother is watching you.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=paramount][quote=scaredycat]well, call em jihadists or whatever, but there could be a large mass of very disgruntled unemployed downt he pike.[/quote]

Oh, so now if your unemployed your a terrorist of some sort.

Man, you elitists really are jerks…[/quote]

Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News and Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.

If you read the article carefully, it notes that Brek is a gun owner, but a LEGAL gun owner (a constitutionally protected right). However, in the context of the article and juxtaposed with his political affiliation (Republican) and his “terroristic threats” (which we’re not privy to, and aren’t shown in the article), Brek suddenly becomes a well armed, foaming at the mouth, reactionary right winger (and “enemy of the state”).

All of this is very carefully orchestrated and done in such a way to chill free speech and muzzle dissent. Its also highly effective, so think carefully about what you say and do, because Big Brother is watching you.

[briansd1]

The Republicans seem to have forgotten about preemption.

smoking gun = mushroom cloud.

smoking gun = dead president. Don’t we want to prevent that? Perhaps some elements in our society don’t want to prevent such an occurrence, but most of us do.

[briansd1]

The Republicans seem to have forgotten about preemption.

smoking gun = mushroom cloud.

smoking gun = dead president. Don’t we want to prevent that? Perhaps some elements in our society don’t want to prevent such an occurrence, but most of us do.

[briansd1]

The Republicans seem to have forgotten about preemption.

smoking gun = mushroom cloud.

smoking gun = dead president. Don’t we want to prevent that? Perhaps some elements in our society don’t want to prevent such an occurrence, but most of us do.

[briansd1]

The Republicans seem to have forgotten about preemption.

smoking gun = mushroom cloud.

smoking gun = dead president. Don’t we want to prevent that? Perhaps some elements in our society don’t want to prevent such an occurrence, but most of us do.

[briansd1]

The Republicans seem to have forgotten about preemption.

smoking gun = mushroom cloud.

smoking gun = dead president. Don’t we want to prevent that? Perhaps some elements in our society don’t want to prevent such an occurrence, but most of us do.

[SK in CV]

I just have to laugh at this one.

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]

I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?

[SK in CV]

I just have to laugh at this one.

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]

I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?

[SK in CV]

I just have to laugh at this one.

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]

I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?

[SK in CV]

I just have to laugh at this one.

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]

I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?

[Author]

Posts