- This topic has 735 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM #428758July 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM #428819briansd1Guest
Interesting article in NY Times on Palin.
Looks like she’s done.
I’m willing to bet that the money she’s going to make will be spent, over the years, bailing out her worthless kids out of trouble. Perhaps it’s more like Palin never was and never will be a good mentor to her kids.
July 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM #429040briansd1GuestInteresting article in NY Times on Palin.
Looks like she’s done.
I’m willing to bet that the money she’s going to make will be spent, over the years, bailing out her worthless kids out of trouble. Perhaps it’s more like Palin never was and never will be a good mentor to her kids.
July 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM #429327briansd1GuestInteresting article in NY Times on Palin.
Looks like she’s done.
I’m willing to bet that the money she’s going to make will be spent, over the years, bailing out her worthless kids out of trouble. Perhaps it’s more like Palin never was and never will be a good mentor to her kids.
July 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM #429398briansd1GuestInteresting article in NY Times on Palin.
Looks like she’s done.
I’m willing to bet that the money she’s going to make will be spent, over the years, bailing out her worthless kids out of trouble. Perhaps it’s more like Palin never was and never will be a good mentor to her kids.
July 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM #429556briansd1GuestInteresting article in NY Times on Palin.
Looks like she’s done.
I’m willing to bet that the money she’s going to make will be spent, over the years, bailing out her worthless kids out of trouble. Perhaps it’s more like Palin never was and never will be a good mentor to her kids.
July 13, 2009 at 12:02 AM #428834briansd1GuestPretty much describes the Palin supporters:
Most important, she stands for a genuine movement: a dwindling white nonurban America that is aflame with grievances and awash in self-pity as the country hurtles into the 21st century and leaves it behind. Palin gives this movement a major party brand and political plausibility that its open-throated media auxiliary, exemplified by Glenn Beck, cannot.
July 13, 2009 at 12:02 AM #429054briansd1GuestPretty much describes the Palin supporters:
Most important, she stands for a genuine movement: a dwindling white nonurban America that is aflame with grievances and awash in self-pity as the country hurtles into the 21st century and leaves it behind. Palin gives this movement a major party brand and political plausibility that its open-throated media auxiliary, exemplified by Glenn Beck, cannot.
July 13, 2009 at 12:02 AM #429341briansd1GuestPretty much describes the Palin supporters:
Most important, she stands for a genuine movement: a dwindling white nonurban America that is aflame with grievances and awash in self-pity as the country hurtles into the 21st century and leaves it behind. Palin gives this movement a major party brand and political plausibility that its open-throated media auxiliary, exemplified by Glenn Beck, cannot.
July 13, 2009 at 12:02 AM #429411briansd1GuestPretty much describes the Palin supporters:
Most important, she stands for a genuine movement: a dwindling white nonurban America that is aflame with grievances and awash in self-pity as the country hurtles into the 21st century and leaves it behind. Palin gives this movement a major party brand and political plausibility that its open-throated media auxiliary, exemplified by Glenn Beck, cannot.
July 13, 2009 at 12:02 AM #429571briansd1GuestPretty much describes the Palin supporters:
Most important, she stands for a genuine movement: a dwindling white nonurban America that is aflame with grievances and awash in self-pity as the country hurtles into the 21st century and leaves it behind. Palin gives this movement a major party brand and political plausibility that its open-throated media auxiliary, exemplified by Glenn Beck, cannot.
July 13, 2009 at 8:43 AM #428880scaredyclassicParticipantok, now, I’m actually starting to become sympathetic towards her as a result of that article. i know it’s biased liberal news media stuff, but dang, she’s justa fast-track career mom who burned out. Sounds like she took all the b.s. to heart and took her eye off thebig picture, career wise, and that her career might not have been compatible with her crazy family life. Unfortunately, women, unlike men, seem to in general, as a matter of steretype, have a more difficult time blowing off their families and concentrating on work.
July 13, 2009 at 8:43 AM #429101scaredyclassicParticipantok, now, I’m actually starting to become sympathetic towards her as a result of that article. i know it’s biased liberal news media stuff, but dang, she’s justa fast-track career mom who burned out. Sounds like she took all the b.s. to heart and took her eye off thebig picture, career wise, and that her career might not have been compatible with her crazy family life. Unfortunately, women, unlike men, seem to in general, as a matter of steretype, have a more difficult time blowing off their families and concentrating on work.
July 13, 2009 at 8:43 AM #429387scaredyclassicParticipantok, now, I’m actually starting to become sympathetic towards her as a result of that article. i know it’s biased liberal news media stuff, but dang, she’s justa fast-track career mom who burned out. Sounds like she took all the b.s. to heart and took her eye off thebig picture, career wise, and that her career might not have been compatible with her crazy family life. Unfortunately, women, unlike men, seem to in general, as a matter of steretype, have a more difficult time blowing off their families and concentrating on work.
July 13, 2009 at 8:43 AM #429458scaredyclassicParticipantok, now, I’m actually starting to become sympathetic towards her as a result of that article. i know it’s biased liberal news media stuff, but dang, she’s justa fast-track career mom who burned out. Sounds like she took all the b.s. to heart and took her eye off thebig picture, career wise, and that her career might not have been compatible with her crazy family life. Unfortunately, women, unlike men, seem to in general, as a matter of steretype, have a more difficult time blowing off their families and concentrating on work.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.