- This topic has 1,090 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM #458328September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #457546dbapigParticipant
[quote=briansd1]
I would love to see polling organizations do “exit interviews” at those events to see the percentage of protesters that have health insurance.Based on the number of missing teeth, I’m sure quite a few don’t have dental coverage. Of course, medical coverage is not the same as dental coverage. That’s why I’m curious.[/quote]
I also would like to see how many of them really want to follow their heart and call for ending Medicare for the sake of saving $$$. Judging that many seemed pretty old enough to qualify for Medicare either now or very soon, I’d bet they want to keep Medicare as it is.
September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #457740dbapigParticipant[quote=briansd1]
I would love to see polling organizations do “exit interviews” at those events to see the percentage of protesters that have health insurance.Based on the number of missing teeth, I’m sure quite a few don’t have dental coverage. Of course, medical coverage is not the same as dental coverage. That’s why I’m curious.[/quote]
I also would like to see how many of them really want to follow their heart and call for ending Medicare for the sake of saving $$$. Judging that many seemed pretty old enough to qualify for Medicare either now or very soon, I’d bet they want to keep Medicare as it is.
September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #458076dbapigParticipant[quote=briansd1]
I would love to see polling organizations do “exit interviews” at those events to see the percentage of protesters that have health insurance.Based on the number of missing teeth, I’m sure quite a few don’t have dental coverage. Of course, medical coverage is not the same as dental coverage. That’s why I’m curious.[/quote]
I also would like to see how many of them really want to follow their heart and call for ending Medicare for the sake of saving $$$. Judging that many seemed pretty old enough to qualify for Medicare either now or very soon, I’d bet they want to keep Medicare as it is.
September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #458147dbapigParticipant[quote=briansd1]
I would love to see polling organizations do “exit interviews” at those events to see the percentage of protesters that have health insurance.Based on the number of missing teeth, I’m sure quite a few don’t have dental coverage. Of course, medical coverage is not the same as dental coverage. That’s why I’m curious.[/quote]
I also would like to see how many of them really want to follow their heart and call for ending Medicare for the sake of saving $$$. Judging that many seemed pretty old enough to qualify for Medicare either now or very soon, I’d bet they want to keep Medicare as it is.
September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #458338dbapigParticipant[quote=briansd1]
I would love to see polling organizations do “exit interviews” at those events to see the percentage of protesters that have health insurance.Based on the number of missing teeth, I’m sure quite a few don’t have dental coverage. Of course, medical coverage is not the same as dental coverage. That’s why I’m curious.[/quote]
I also would like to see how many of them really want to follow their heart and call for ending Medicare for the sake of saving $$$. Judging that many seemed pretty old enough to qualify for Medicare either now or very soon, I’d bet they want to keep Medicare as it is.
September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #457551AecetiaParticipantSdgrrl-
Where is the quote about the good ole days? You are the only one saying that. Zeit said people are less civil today. You always attack posts from Zeit and constantly emotionally read into them. Try sticking to the facts. It was an observation that times have changed. No one but you said the old days were better. None of the women I know liked the double standard. No one I know thinks racism or sexism should be the norm. Most people I know do not think that people should be taxed if they do not want health insurance. Those times were not better. On the other hand, apparently Washington was left in the same condition it was found. It was not trashed. I think this is a good improvement and shows that some people care about the environment.September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #457746AecetiaParticipantSdgrrl-
Where is the quote about the good ole days? You are the only one saying that. Zeit said people are less civil today. You always attack posts from Zeit and constantly emotionally read into them. Try sticking to the facts. It was an observation that times have changed. No one but you said the old days were better. None of the women I know liked the double standard. No one I know thinks racism or sexism should be the norm. Most people I know do not think that people should be taxed if they do not want health insurance. Those times were not better. On the other hand, apparently Washington was left in the same condition it was found. It was not trashed. I think this is a good improvement and shows that some people care about the environment.September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #458081AecetiaParticipantSdgrrl-
Where is the quote about the good ole days? You are the only one saying that. Zeit said people are less civil today. You always attack posts from Zeit and constantly emotionally read into them. Try sticking to the facts. It was an observation that times have changed. No one but you said the old days were better. None of the women I know liked the double standard. No one I know thinks racism or sexism should be the norm. Most people I know do not think that people should be taxed if they do not want health insurance. Those times were not better. On the other hand, apparently Washington was left in the same condition it was found. It was not trashed. I think this is a good improvement and shows that some people care about the environment.September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #458152AecetiaParticipantSdgrrl-
Where is the quote about the good ole days? You are the only one saying that. Zeit said people are less civil today. You always attack posts from Zeit and constantly emotionally read into them. Try sticking to the facts. It was an observation that times have changed. No one but you said the old days were better. None of the women I know liked the double standard. No one I know thinks racism or sexism should be the norm. Most people I know do not think that people should be taxed if they do not want health insurance. Those times were not better. On the other hand, apparently Washington was left in the same condition it was found. It was not trashed. I think this is a good improvement and shows that some people care about the environment.September 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM #458343AecetiaParticipantSdgrrl-
Where is the quote about the good ole days? You are the only one saying that. Zeit said people are less civil today. You always attack posts from Zeit and constantly emotionally read into them. Try sticking to the facts. It was an observation that times have changed. No one but you said the old days were better. None of the women I know liked the double standard. No one I know thinks racism or sexism should be the norm. Most people I know do not think that people should be taxed if they do not want health insurance. Those times were not better. On the other hand, apparently Washington was left in the same condition it was found. It was not trashed. I think this is a good improvement and shows that some people care about the environment.September 16, 2009 at 3:43 PM #457566dbapigParticipant[quote=felix]Both parties have radical elements. Both parties have those who have those who buy into extreme ideas and conspiratorial theories.
However, there is a difference between the parties with regard to extremism. The Republicans don’t put those types in positions of power. [/quote]
Who were Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rove?
Ever heard of Rumsfeld and ASPARTAME? Google those 2 terms together.
September 16, 2009 at 3:43 PM #457761dbapigParticipant[quote=felix]Both parties have radical elements. Both parties have those who have those who buy into extreme ideas and conspiratorial theories.
However, there is a difference between the parties with regard to extremism. The Republicans don’t put those types in positions of power. [/quote]
Who were Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rove?
Ever heard of Rumsfeld and ASPARTAME? Google those 2 terms together.
September 16, 2009 at 3:43 PM #458096dbapigParticipant[quote=felix]Both parties have radical elements. Both parties have those who have those who buy into extreme ideas and conspiratorial theories.
However, there is a difference between the parties with regard to extremism. The Republicans don’t put those types in positions of power. [/quote]
Who were Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rove?
Ever heard of Rumsfeld and ASPARTAME? Google those 2 terms together.
September 16, 2009 at 3:43 PM #458167dbapigParticipant[quote=felix]Both parties have radical elements. Both parties have those who have those who buy into extreme ideas and conspiratorial theories.
However, there is a difference between the parties with regard to extremism. The Republicans don’t put those types in positions of power. [/quote]
Who were Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rove?
Ever heard of Rumsfeld and ASPARTAME? Google those 2 terms together.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.