- This topic has 155 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 4, 2010 at 9:47 PM #499968January 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM #499221briansd1Guest
Ray, you must be a business consultant of some kind.
I hate to say it but businesses are loosing money because they borrowed and invested based on consultants’ advices but aren’t getting the return.
If all businesses offered better services but aren’t able to charge for them, it becomes a loosing proposition. You don’t find that out until years later during a down business cycle. The debts still need to be paid back, but the revenues aren’t there any longer. That’s why hotels and airlines are cutting back. That’s why hotels and airlines don’t charge everyone the same price for the same service.
The dealer invested in his own business and he should be able to operate it the way he wants to maximize his profits. That’s what competition and capitalism is all about.
The only way your system would work is if the auto manufacturers owned the distribution channel. That won’t happen because they don’t have the money to invest in (or buy out) dealerships.
I personally like to haggle because I believe that I generally get good prices. If I don’t like a price, I always have to option to say no. What’s so difficult about that?
And why should good negotiators subsidize the bad ones? As I said before, if one wants an easy, smooth, no negotiating transaction, one always has the option of paying sticker price. Same thing goes with a house.
Just because prices are set the same for everyone doesn’t mean you’re not overpaying for the product or service.
January 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM #499372briansd1GuestRay, you must be a business consultant of some kind.
I hate to say it but businesses are loosing money because they borrowed and invested based on consultants’ advices but aren’t getting the return.
If all businesses offered better services but aren’t able to charge for them, it becomes a loosing proposition. You don’t find that out until years later during a down business cycle. The debts still need to be paid back, but the revenues aren’t there any longer. That’s why hotels and airlines are cutting back. That’s why hotels and airlines don’t charge everyone the same price for the same service.
The dealer invested in his own business and he should be able to operate it the way he wants to maximize his profits. That’s what competition and capitalism is all about.
The only way your system would work is if the auto manufacturers owned the distribution channel. That won’t happen because they don’t have the money to invest in (or buy out) dealerships.
I personally like to haggle because I believe that I generally get good prices. If I don’t like a price, I always have to option to say no. What’s so difficult about that?
And why should good negotiators subsidize the bad ones? As I said before, if one wants an easy, smooth, no negotiating transaction, one always has the option of paying sticker price. Same thing goes with a house.
Just because prices are set the same for everyone doesn’t mean you’re not overpaying for the product or service.
January 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM #499766briansd1GuestRay, you must be a business consultant of some kind.
I hate to say it but businesses are loosing money because they borrowed and invested based on consultants’ advices but aren’t getting the return.
If all businesses offered better services but aren’t able to charge for them, it becomes a loosing proposition. You don’t find that out until years later during a down business cycle. The debts still need to be paid back, but the revenues aren’t there any longer. That’s why hotels and airlines are cutting back. That’s why hotels and airlines don’t charge everyone the same price for the same service.
The dealer invested in his own business and he should be able to operate it the way he wants to maximize his profits. That’s what competition and capitalism is all about.
The only way your system would work is if the auto manufacturers owned the distribution channel. That won’t happen because they don’t have the money to invest in (or buy out) dealerships.
I personally like to haggle because I believe that I generally get good prices. If I don’t like a price, I always have to option to say no. What’s so difficult about that?
And why should good negotiators subsidize the bad ones? As I said before, if one wants an easy, smooth, no negotiating transaction, one always has the option of paying sticker price. Same thing goes with a house.
Just because prices are set the same for everyone doesn’t mean you’re not overpaying for the product or service.
January 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM #499857briansd1GuestRay, you must be a business consultant of some kind.
I hate to say it but businesses are loosing money because they borrowed and invested based on consultants’ advices but aren’t getting the return.
If all businesses offered better services but aren’t able to charge for them, it becomes a loosing proposition. You don’t find that out until years later during a down business cycle. The debts still need to be paid back, but the revenues aren’t there any longer. That’s why hotels and airlines are cutting back. That’s why hotels and airlines don’t charge everyone the same price for the same service.
The dealer invested in his own business and he should be able to operate it the way he wants to maximize his profits. That’s what competition and capitalism is all about.
The only way your system would work is if the auto manufacturers owned the distribution channel. That won’t happen because they don’t have the money to invest in (or buy out) dealerships.
I personally like to haggle because I believe that I generally get good prices. If I don’t like a price, I always have to option to say no. What’s so difficult about that?
And why should good negotiators subsidize the bad ones? As I said before, if one wants an easy, smooth, no negotiating transaction, one always has the option of paying sticker price. Same thing goes with a house.
Just because prices are set the same for everyone doesn’t mean you’re not overpaying for the product or service.
January 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM #500107briansd1GuestRay, you must be a business consultant of some kind.
I hate to say it but businesses are loosing money because they borrowed and invested based on consultants’ advices but aren’t getting the return.
If all businesses offered better services but aren’t able to charge for them, it becomes a loosing proposition. You don’t find that out until years later during a down business cycle. The debts still need to be paid back, but the revenues aren’t there any longer. That’s why hotels and airlines are cutting back. That’s why hotels and airlines don’t charge everyone the same price for the same service.
The dealer invested in his own business and he should be able to operate it the way he wants to maximize his profits. That’s what competition and capitalism is all about.
The only way your system would work is if the auto manufacturers owned the distribution channel. That won’t happen because they don’t have the money to invest in (or buy out) dealerships.
I personally like to haggle because I believe that I generally get good prices. If I don’t like a price, I always have to option to say no. What’s so difficult about that?
And why should good negotiators subsidize the bad ones? As I said before, if one wants an easy, smooth, no negotiating transaction, one always has the option of paying sticker price. Same thing goes with a house.
Just because prices are set the same for everyone doesn’t mean you’re not overpaying for the product or service.
January 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM #499365RaybyrnesParticipantbriansd1
If competition and the system worked we wouldn’t be bailing out the auto makers. The system is broke. It needs to change. The internet has changed the nature of buying and selling.
Costco has locations all over the US. Would they be better off charging more or less for memberships based on location.
I am certain we could exchanges examples that support or contradicts each other argument.
With respect to haggling I rarely need to do any of it. I typically buy triple net minus manufacturers rebates. I prefer to buy new and think there are some advantages with respect to financing. Most dealers know, that I know how the game works so
There is a challenge with respect to San Diego dealers not having the same sales volumes as those in LA . That put’s them at a disadvantage.
Where car dealers stand to make the most money is in the used car market. This is where haggling and negotiation come into play. I am not a mechanic so other than looking at years, miles and price it is hard for me to determine an executives vehicle vs one drive by a 16 year old.
January 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM #499517RaybyrnesParticipantbriansd1
If competition and the system worked we wouldn’t be bailing out the auto makers. The system is broke. It needs to change. The internet has changed the nature of buying and selling.
Costco has locations all over the US. Would they be better off charging more or less for memberships based on location.
I am certain we could exchanges examples that support or contradicts each other argument.
With respect to haggling I rarely need to do any of it. I typically buy triple net minus manufacturers rebates. I prefer to buy new and think there are some advantages with respect to financing. Most dealers know, that I know how the game works so
There is a challenge with respect to San Diego dealers not having the same sales volumes as those in LA . That put’s them at a disadvantage.
Where car dealers stand to make the most money is in the used car market. This is where haggling and negotiation come into play. I am not a mechanic so other than looking at years, miles and price it is hard for me to determine an executives vehicle vs one drive by a 16 year old.
January 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM #499911RaybyrnesParticipantbriansd1
If competition and the system worked we wouldn’t be bailing out the auto makers. The system is broke. It needs to change. The internet has changed the nature of buying and selling.
Costco has locations all over the US. Would they be better off charging more or less for memberships based on location.
I am certain we could exchanges examples that support or contradicts each other argument.
With respect to haggling I rarely need to do any of it. I typically buy triple net minus manufacturers rebates. I prefer to buy new and think there are some advantages with respect to financing. Most dealers know, that I know how the game works so
There is a challenge with respect to San Diego dealers not having the same sales volumes as those in LA . That put’s them at a disadvantage.
Where car dealers stand to make the most money is in the used car market. This is where haggling and negotiation come into play. I am not a mechanic so other than looking at years, miles and price it is hard for me to determine an executives vehicle vs one drive by a 16 year old.
January 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM #500004RaybyrnesParticipantbriansd1
If competition and the system worked we wouldn’t be bailing out the auto makers. The system is broke. It needs to change. The internet has changed the nature of buying and selling.
Costco has locations all over the US. Would they be better off charging more or less for memberships based on location.
I am certain we could exchanges examples that support or contradicts each other argument.
With respect to haggling I rarely need to do any of it. I typically buy triple net minus manufacturers rebates. I prefer to buy new and think there are some advantages with respect to financing. Most dealers know, that I know how the game works so
There is a challenge with respect to San Diego dealers not having the same sales volumes as those in LA . That put’s them at a disadvantage.
Where car dealers stand to make the most money is in the used car market. This is where haggling and negotiation come into play. I am not a mechanic so other than looking at years, miles and price it is hard for me to determine an executives vehicle vs one drive by a 16 year old.
January 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM #500252RaybyrnesParticipantbriansd1
If competition and the system worked we wouldn’t be bailing out the auto makers. The system is broke. It needs to change. The internet has changed the nature of buying and selling.
Costco has locations all over the US. Would they be better off charging more or less for memberships based on location.
I am certain we could exchanges examples that support or contradicts each other argument.
With respect to haggling I rarely need to do any of it. I typically buy triple net minus manufacturers rebates. I prefer to buy new and think there are some advantages with respect to financing. Most dealers know, that I know how the game works so
There is a challenge with respect to San Diego dealers not having the same sales volumes as those in LA . That put’s them at a disadvantage.
Where car dealers stand to make the most money is in the used car market. This is where haggling and negotiation come into play. I am not a mechanic so other than looking at years, miles and price it is hard for me to determine an executives vehicle vs one drive by a 16 year old.
January 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM #500010paramountParticipantJust for the record I do not recommend Rancho Ford Temecula or the Costco Auto Buying program.
January 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM #500160paramountParticipantJust for the record I do not recommend Rancho Ford Temecula or the Costco Auto Buying program.
January 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM #500560paramountParticipantJust for the record I do not recommend Rancho Ford Temecula or the Costco Auto Buying program.
January 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM #500653paramountParticipantJust for the record I do not recommend Rancho Ford Temecula or the Costco Auto Buying program.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.