- This topic has 155 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 3, 2010 at 11:13 AM #499518January 3, 2010 at 12:17 PM #498669svelteParticipant
[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
Is this the “far superior” transmission you are referring to?
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0da296/90
Comparing the CX-7 to the Edge is apples to oranges since the CX-7 comes with a 244 HP 4 cylinder while the Edge comes with a 265 HP 3.5 liter V6.
The CX-9 does have a 273 HP 3.7 liter V6, which as you state is the same base Ford Cyclone engine as the Edge.
January 3, 2010 at 12:17 PM #498819svelteParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
Is this the “far superior” transmission you are referring to?
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0da296/90
Comparing the CX-7 to the Edge is apples to oranges since the CX-7 comes with a 244 HP 4 cylinder while the Edge comes with a 265 HP 3.5 liter V6.
The CX-9 does have a 273 HP 3.7 liter V6, which as you state is the same base Ford Cyclone engine as the Edge.
January 3, 2010 at 12:17 PM #499210svelteParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
Is this the “far superior” transmission you are referring to?
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0da296/90
Comparing the CX-7 to the Edge is apples to oranges since the CX-7 comes with a 244 HP 4 cylinder while the Edge comes with a 265 HP 3.5 liter V6.
The CX-9 does have a 273 HP 3.7 liter V6, which as you state is the same base Ford Cyclone engine as the Edge.
January 3, 2010 at 12:17 PM #499301svelteParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
Is this the “far superior” transmission you are referring to?
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0da296/90
Comparing the CX-7 to the Edge is apples to oranges since the CX-7 comes with a 244 HP 4 cylinder while the Edge comes with a 265 HP 3.5 liter V6.
The CX-9 does have a 273 HP 3.7 liter V6, which as you state is the same base Ford Cyclone engine as the Edge.
January 3, 2010 at 12:17 PM #499548svelteParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
Is this the “far superior” transmission you are referring to?
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f0da296/90
Comparing the CX-7 to the Edge is apples to oranges since the CX-7 comes with a 244 HP 4 cylinder while the Edge comes with a 265 HP 3.5 liter V6.
The CX-9 does have a 273 HP 3.7 liter V6, which as you state is the same base Ford Cyclone engine as the Edge.
January 3, 2010 at 1:20 PM #498674CoronitaParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
I was considering the CX-7 but it’s a 4 banger turbo and it’s not more fuel efficient than the 3.5V6 in the Edge, and the last thing I want to deal with are turbo’s in an SUV, which needs to be pampered. CX-9 is MDX territory, not interested.
January 3, 2010 at 1:20 PM #498824CoronitaParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
I was considering the CX-7 but it’s a 4 banger turbo and it’s not more fuel efficient than the 3.5V6 in the Edge, and the last thing I want to deal with are turbo’s in an SUV, which needs to be pampered. CX-9 is MDX territory, not interested.
January 3, 2010 at 1:20 PM #499215CoronitaParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
I was considering the CX-7 but it’s a 4 banger turbo and it’s not more fuel efficient than the 3.5V6 in the Edge, and the last thing I want to deal with are turbo’s in an SUV, which needs to be pampered. CX-9 is MDX territory, not interested.
January 3, 2010 at 1:20 PM #499306CoronitaParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
I was considering the CX-7 but it’s a 4 banger turbo and it’s not more fuel efficient than the 3.5V6 in the Edge, and the last thing I want to deal with are turbo’s in an SUV, which needs to be pampered. CX-9 is MDX territory, not interested.
January 3, 2010 at 1:20 PM #499553CoronitaParticipant[quote=Jim Jones]Flu,
Take a look at the Mazda CX-7 or CX-9. I think it’s nicer then the Edge and has the Ford engine with a far superior Japanese designed transmission. It is not US made but it is a much nicer vehicle for the same price.[/quote]
I was considering the CX-7 but it’s a 4 banger turbo and it’s not more fuel efficient than the 3.5V6 in the Edge, and the last thing I want to deal with are turbo’s in an SUV, which needs to be pampered. CX-9 is MDX territory, not interested.
January 3, 2010 at 1:22 PM #498677Rt.66ParticipantThis is the dependability ranking:
http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009043I prefer this to the “initial quality” ranking because this one is based on quality after the initial purchase excitement has worn off.
Buick is Number 1
Ford is number 13
Mazda is number……….wait for it…….34Problems per 100 vehicles is relativiely close among the top performers with 37 seperating Buick and Ford but it then makes a big jump down around the bottom where Mazda resides with a whopping 68 seperating Ford and Mazda’s ranking.
January 3, 2010 at 1:22 PM #498829Rt.66ParticipantThis is the dependability ranking:
http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009043I prefer this to the “initial quality” ranking because this one is based on quality after the initial purchase excitement has worn off.
Buick is Number 1
Ford is number 13
Mazda is number……….wait for it…….34Problems per 100 vehicles is relativiely close among the top performers with 37 seperating Buick and Ford but it then makes a big jump down around the bottom where Mazda resides with a whopping 68 seperating Ford and Mazda’s ranking.
January 3, 2010 at 1:22 PM #499220Rt.66ParticipantThis is the dependability ranking:
http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009043I prefer this to the “initial quality” ranking because this one is based on quality after the initial purchase excitement has worn off.
Buick is Number 1
Ford is number 13
Mazda is number……….wait for it…….34Problems per 100 vehicles is relativiely close among the top performers with 37 seperating Buick and Ford but it then makes a big jump down around the bottom where Mazda resides with a whopping 68 seperating Ford and Mazda’s ranking.
January 3, 2010 at 1:22 PM #499311Rt.66ParticipantThis is the dependability ranking:
http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009043I prefer this to the “initial quality” ranking because this one is based on quality after the initial purchase excitement has worn off.
Buick is Number 1
Ford is number 13
Mazda is number……….wait for it…….34Problems per 100 vehicles is relativiely close among the top performers with 37 seperating Buick and Ford but it then makes a big jump down around the bottom where Mazda resides with a whopping 68 seperating Ford and Mazda’s ranking.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.