- This topic has 250 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 9, 2010 at 5:06 PM #524468March 9, 2010 at 11:42 PM #523781CubeParticipant
Now wait a minute, when they’re bandying about the cost of health care as a percentage of GDP, are they using the sticker price for healthcare or the actual price paid?
I always assumed the latter, but my inner cynic suddenly saw that the former is a great way to twist the numbers to make them look much worse than they are. I hope that’s just my inner cynic and not reality.
March 9, 2010 at 11:42 PM #523918CubeParticipantNow wait a minute, when they’re bandying about the cost of health care as a percentage of GDP, are they using the sticker price for healthcare or the actual price paid?
I always assumed the latter, but my inner cynic suddenly saw that the former is a great way to twist the numbers to make them look much worse than they are. I hope that’s just my inner cynic and not reality.
March 9, 2010 at 11:42 PM #524359CubeParticipantNow wait a minute, when they’re bandying about the cost of health care as a percentage of GDP, are they using the sticker price for healthcare or the actual price paid?
I always assumed the latter, but my inner cynic suddenly saw that the former is a great way to twist the numbers to make them look much worse than they are. I hope that’s just my inner cynic and not reality.
March 9, 2010 at 11:42 PM #524455CubeParticipantNow wait a minute, when they’re bandying about the cost of health care as a percentage of GDP, are they using the sticker price for healthcare or the actual price paid?
I always assumed the latter, but my inner cynic suddenly saw that the former is a great way to twist the numbers to make them look much worse than they are. I hope that’s just my inner cynic and not reality.
March 9, 2010 at 11:42 PM #524712CubeParticipantNow wait a minute, when they’re bandying about the cost of health care as a percentage of GDP, are they using the sticker price for healthcare or the actual price paid?
I always assumed the latter, but my inner cynic suddenly saw that the former is a great way to twist the numbers to make them look much worse than they are. I hope that’s just my inner cynic and not reality.
March 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM #524201Diego MamaniParticipantNicMM: I just sent you a PM with some real-world experience. You need to think back of what papers you signed at the hospital. Most likely they were for a next of kin authorizing care. However, they could have been about assuming financial liability. OTOH, if you signed with your dad’s name… then maybe you’re already off the hook.
I remember reading something about a teenager (maybe pre-teen) who had an accident, not life threatening, and was taken to the ER by his grandfather. When the hospital staff asked the old man “who is the (financially) responsible party?” he pointed at his grandson and said “he is!” That was a smart thing to say, by the way. In this case, the ER staff proceeded to stabilize the patient and grandpa didn’t have to worry about paying anything.
March 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM #524338Diego MamaniParticipantNicMM: I just sent you a PM with some real-world experience. You need to think back of what papers you signed at the hospital. Most likely they were for a next of kin authorizing care. However, they could have been about assuming financial liability. OTOH, if you signed with your dad’s name… then maybe you’re already off the hook.
I remember reading something about a teenager (maybe pre-teen) who had an accident, not life threatening, and was taken to the ER by his grandfather. When the hospital staff asked the old man “who is the (financially) responsible party?” he pointed at his grandson and said “he is!” That was a smart thing to say, by the way. In this case, the ER staff proceeded to stabilize the patient and grandpa didn’t have to worry about paying anything.
March 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM #524779Diego MamaniParticipantNicMM: I just sent you a PM with some real-world experience. You need to think back of what papers you signed at the hospital. Most likely they were for a next of kin authorizing care. However, they could have been about assuming financial liability. OTOH, if you signed with your dad’s name… then maybe you’re already off the hook.
I remember reading something about a teenager (maybe pre-teen) who had an accident, not life threatening, and was taken to the ER by his grandfather. When the hospital staff asked the old man “who is the (financially) responsible party?” he pointed at his grandson and said “he is!” That was a smart thing to say, by the way. In this case, the ER staff proceeded to stabilize the patient and grandpa didn’t have to worry about paying anything.
March 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM #524875Diego MamaniParticipantNicMM: I just sent you a PM with some real-world experience. You need to think back of what papers you signed at the hospital. Most likely they were for a next of kin authorizing care. However, they could have been about assuming financial liability. OTOH, if you signed with your dad’s name… then maybe you’re already off the hook.
I remember reading something about a teenager (maybe pre-teen) who had an accident, not life threatening, and was taken to the ER by his grandfather. When the hospital staff asked the old man “who is the (financially) responsible party?” he pointed at his grandson and said “he is!” That was a smart thing to say, by the way. In this case, the ER staff proceeded to stabilize the patient and grandpa didn’t have to worry about paying anything.
March 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM #525133Diego MamaniParticipantNicMM: I just sent you a PM with some real-world experience. You need to think back of what papers you signed at the hospital. Most likely they were for a next of kin authorizing care. However, they could have been about assuming financial liability. OTOH, if you signed with your dad’s name… then maybe you’re already off the hook.
I remember reading something about a teenager (maybe pre-teen) who had an accident, not life threatening, and was taken to the ER by his grandfather. When the hospital staff asked the old man “who is the (financially) responsible party?” he pointed at his grandson and said “he is!” That was a smart thing to say, by the way. In this case, the ER staff proceeded to stabilize the patient and grandpa didn’t have to worry about paying anything.
March 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM #524528investorParticipantAs a physician, I sign up to accept insurance at reduced rates all of the time. My “usual and customary” fees really are meaningless and these are what are typically sent out for payment first. If someone eventually owes the hospital, start with the medicare fees and negotiate down from there. Medicare is one of the lower paying insurance carriers out there. good luck.
March 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM #524661investorParticipantAs a physician, I sign up to accept insurance at reduced rates all of the time. My “usual and customary” fees really are meaningless and these are what are typically sent out for payment first. If someone eventually owes the hospital, start with the medicare fees and negotiate down from there. Medicare is one of the lower paying insurance carriers out there. good luck.
March 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM #525104investorParticipantAs a physician, I sign up to accept insurance at reduced rates all of the time. My “usual and customary” fees really are meaningless and these are what are typically sent out for payment first. If someone eventually owes the hospital, start with the medicare fees and negotiate down from there. Medicare is one of the lower paying insurance carriers out there. good luck.
March 11, 2010 at 11:13 AM #525200investorParticipantAs a physician, I sign up to accept insurance at reduced rates all of the time. My “usual and customary” fees really are meaningless and these are what are typically sent out for payment first. If someone eventually owes the hospital, start with the medicare fees and negotiate down from there. Medicare is one of the lower paying insurance carriers out there. good luck.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.