OT: Explosives in Escondido

[Eugene]

[quote=flu]
NPR says that the homeowner is most likely S.O.L because most homeowner insurance wouldn’t ensure for something like this.[/quote]

If I were the homeowner, and my insurance didn’t want to pay, and the government wanted to make me $200,000 poorer by burning down my house without compensation, I’d be in the court trying to get an injunction against the burning. Fifth amendment, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”.

Since we didn’t hear about the homeowner trying to stop the burning, some kind of deal must have been worked out. Maybe the government paid half and the insurance company paid another half.

[TemekuT]

Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.

[TemekuT]

Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.

[TemekuT]

Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.

[TemekuT]

Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.

[TemekuT]

Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Lol, thanx for this info, TemekuT :=]

[bearishgurl]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Lol, thanx for this info, TemekuT :=]

[bearishgurl]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Lol, thanx for this info, TemekuT :=]

[bearishgurl]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Lol, thanx for this info, TemekuT :=]

[bearishgurl]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Lol, thanx for this info, TemekuT :=]

[enron_by_the_sea]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Hmm. We have heard about underwater homeowners burning down the property. This might be taking it to the new level (just kidding :))

[enron_by_the_sea]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Hmm. We have heard about underwater homeowners burning down the property. This might be taking it to the new level (just kidding :))

[enron_by_the_sea]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Hmm. We have heard about underwater homeowners burning down the property. This might be taking it to the new level (just kidding :))

[enron_by_the_sea]

[quote=TemekuT]Don’t cry crocodile tears for this “owner”. Property was purchased with zero down in 2005 with 80/20 loans and refinanced in 2006 with closing costs added – piggybacked again with 88/12 loans. Surprisingly no cash was extracted. “Buyer” put nothing into the property and has lost nothing as there is probably a snowball’s chance in hell that the property is worth what was paid for it. Too bad for for Homecomings Financial though, lol.[/quote]

Hmm. We have heard about underwater homeowners burning down the property. This might be taking it to the new level (just kidding :))

[Author]

Posts