OT: Explosives in Escondido

[all]

[quote=pri_dk]You are correct, the name is more likely Czech, but the Jakubec in this story is from Serbia.

So we can change it to: “One has an Arabic name, the other has an eastern European name.”

Point still stands.[/quote]

Well, an American is more likely to feel less than welcome in Somalia than in Slovakia.

[paramount]

I hope whoever is heading up this operation contracted with an outside consultant; although this sounds like a foolish plan cooked up by gov’t workers.

Of course the gov’t does have a lot of practice burning houses and buildings down with Waco and all that.

[paramount]

I hope whoever is heading up this operation contracted with an outside consultant; although this sounds like a foolish plan cooked up by gov’t workers.

Of course the gov’t does have a lot of practice burning houses and buildings down with Waco and all that.

[paramount]

I hope whoever is heading up this operation contracted with an outside consultant; although this sounds like a foolish plan cooked up by gov’t workers.

Of course the gov’t does have a lot of practice burning houses and buildings down with Waco and all that.

[paramount]

I hope whoever is heading up this operation contracted with an outside consultant; although this sounds like a foolish plan cooked up by gov’t workers.

Of course the gov’t does have a lot of practice burning houses and buildings down with Waco and all that.

[paramount]

I hope whoever is heading up this operation contracted with an outside consultant; although this sounds like a foolish plan cooked up by gov’t workers.

Of course the gov’t does have a lot of practice burning houses and buildings down with Waco and all that.

[Hatfield]

[quote=UCGal]It sounds like insurance will not cover the burning down of the house. And it sounds like there’s a significant risk that neighboring houses could go up in flames as well.[/quote]

I’m wondering what recourse the landlord would have in this case. Is his only course of action to pursue a (probably futile) civil suit against the tenant?

Assuming that the landlord acted reasonably and had no reasonable suspicions about his renter, I’m not sure how he could have protected himself. And what about the neighbors, if the fire spreads?

[Hatfield]

[quote=UCGal]It sounds like insurance will not cover the burning down of the house. And it sounds like there’s a significant risk that neighboring houses could go up in flames as well.[/quote]

I’m wondering what recourse the landlord would have in this case. Is his only course of action to pursue a (probably futile) civil suit against the tenant?

Assuming that the landlord acted reasonably and had no reasonable suspicions about his renter, I’m not sure how he could have protected himself. And what about the neighbors, if the fire spreads?

[Hatfield]

[quote=UCGal]It sounds like insurance will not cover the burning down of the house. And it sounds like there’s a significant risk that neighboring houses could go up in flames as well.[/quote]

I’m wondering what recourse the landlord would have in this case. Is his only course of action to pursue a (probably futile) civil suit against the tenant?

Assuming that the landlord acted reasonably and had no reasonable suspicions about his renter, I’m not sure how he could have protected himself. And what about the neighbors, if the fire spreads?

[Hatfield]

[quote=UCGal]It sounds like insurance will not cover the burning down of the house. And it sounds like there’s a significant risk that neighboring houses could go up in flames as well.[/quote]

I’m wondering what recourse the landlord would have in this case. Is his only course of action to pursue a (probably futile) civil suit against the tenant?

Assuming that the landlord acted reasonably and had no reasonable suspicions about his renter, I’m not sure how he could have protected himself. And what about the neighbors, if the fire spreads?

[Hatfield]

[quote=UCGal]It sounds like insurance will not cover the burning down of the house. And it sounds like there’s a significant risk that neighboring houses could go up in flames as well.[/quote]

I’m wondering what recourse the landlord would have in this case. Is his only course of action to pursue a (probably futile) civil suit against the tenant?

Assuming that the landlord acted reasonably and had no reasonable suspicions about his renter, I’m not sure how he could have protected himself. And what about the neighbors, if the fire spreads?

[LAAFTERHOURS]

Burning the house down on Wednesday. 15 to be shut down. I may hit up Double Peak park in San elijo to watch the show.

Im a bit scared to think if there is more explosives inside than they know about. Burning explosives doesnt sound like a wise idea.

[LAAFTERHOURS]

Burning the house down on Wednesday. 15 to be shut down. I may hit up Double Peak park in San elijo to watch the show.

Im a bit scared to think if there is more explosives inside than they know about. Burning explosives doesnt sound like a wise idea.

[LAAFTERHOURS]

Burning the house down on Wednesday. 15 to be shut down. I may hit up Double Peak park in San elijo to watch the show.

Im a bit scared to think if there is more explosives inside than they know about. Burning explosives doesnt sound like a wise idea.

[LAAFTERHOURS]

Burning the house down on Wednesday. 15 to be shut down. I may hit up Double Peak park in San elijo to watch the show.

Im a bit scared to think if there is more explosives inside than they know about. Burning explosives doesnt sound like a wise idea.

[Author]

Posts