- This topic has 150 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM #627694November 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM #626630daveljParticipant
The reality is that the Gulf only supplies a very small percentage of US seafood – well below 5%, maybe 2%-3% if memory serves. And maybe 6% of all US shrimp.
Most of the shrimp – even in New Orleans – comes from Asia. A lot of the fish – and 100% of catfish – come from farms that aren’t actually in the Gulf itself (although in the region). And a lot of fish come from Asian fish farms as well.
I don’t know about crabs and oysters… I think most of New Orleans’ supply of these is local, so I’d think a decent amount comes from the Gulf itself.
My point is that if you sit down at Galatoire’s and order a seafood platter (which I suggest, by the way), a relatively small percentage of what shows up on your plate will actually be from the Gulf of Mexico.
November 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM #626709daveljParticipantThe reality is that the Gulf only supplies a very small percentage of US seafood – well below 5%, maybe 2%-3% if memory serves. And maybe 6% of all US shrimp.
Most of the shrimp – even in New Orleans – comes from Asia. A lot of the fish – and 100% of catfish – come from farms that aren’t actually in the Gulf itself (although in the region). And a lot of fish come from Asian fish farms as well.
I don’t know about crabs and oysters… I think most of New Orleans’ supply of these is local, so I’d think a decent amount comes from the Gulf itself.
My point is that if you sit down at Galatoire’s and order a seafood platter (which I suggest, by the way), a relatively small percentage of what shows up on your plate will actually be from the Gulf of Mexico.
November 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM #627266daveljParticipantThe reality is that the Gulf only supplies a very small percentage of US seafood – well below 5%, maybe 2%-3% if memory serves. And maybe 6% of all US shrimp.
Most of the shrimp – even in New Orleans – comes from Asia. A lot of the fish – and 100% of catfish – come from farms that aren’t actually in the Gulf itself (although in the region). And a lot of fish come from Asian fish farms as well.
I don’t know about crabs and oysters… I think most of New Orleans’ supply of these is local, so I’d think a decent amount comes from the Gulf itself.
My point is that if you sit down at Galatoire’s and order a seafood platter (which I suggest, by the way), a relatively small percentage of what shows up on your plate will actually be from the Gulf of Mexico.
November 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM #627387daveljParticipantThe reality is that the Gulf only supplies a very small percentage of US seafood – well below 5%, maybe 2%-3% if memory serves. And maybe 6% of all US shrimp.
Most of the shrimp – even in New Orleans – comes from Asia. A lot of the fish – and 100% of catfish – come from farms that aren’t actually in the Gulf itself (although in the region). And a lot of fish come from Asian fish farms as well.
I don’t know about crabs and oysters… I think most of New Orleans’ supply of these is local, so I’d think a decent amount comes from the Gulf itself.
My point is that if you sit down at Galatoire’s and order a seafood platter (which I suggest, by the way), a relatively small percentage of what shows up on your plate will actually be from the Gulf of Mexico.
November 4, 2010 at 11:10 AM #627698daveljParticipantThe reality is that the Gulf only supplies a very small percentage of US seafood – well below 5%, maybe 2%-3% if memory serves. And maybe 6% of all US shrimp.
Most of the shrimp – even in New Orleans – comes from Asia. A lot of the fish – and 100% of catfish – come from farms that aren’t actually in the Gulf itself (although in the region). And a lot of fish come from Asian fish farms as well.
I don’t know about crabs and oysters… I think most of New Orleans’ supply of these is local, so I’d think a decent amount comes from the Gulf itself.
My point is that if you sit down at Galatoire’s and order a seafood platter (which I suggest, by the way), a relatively small percentage of what shows up on your plate will actually be from the Gulf of Mexico.
November 4, 2010 at 11:49 AM #626673Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell]It happens everytime I contemplate going back to “Rustico” with my screen name.[/quote]
Rus: You should go back to “Rustico” and I say that in all honesty (well, with maybe a smidgen of irony). That was a great handle and, given your hanging out in the bucolic great outdoors and enjoying a simple, sustainable lifestyle, it fits perfectly.
I could also suggest “Swab Jockey”, but that might get misinterpreted.
November 4, 2010 at 11:49 AM #626753Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell]It happens everytime I contemplate going back to “Rustico” with my screen name.[/quote]
Rus: You should go back to “Rustico” and I say that in all honesty (well, with maybe a smidgen of irony). That was a great handle and, given your hanging out in the bucolic great outdoors and enjoying a simple, sustainable lifestyle, it fits perfectly.
I could also suggest “Swab Jockey”, but that might get misinterpreted.
November 4, 2010 at 11:49 AM #627309Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell]It happens everytime I contemplate going back to “Rustico” with my screen name.[/quote]
Rus: You should go back to “Rustico” and I say that in all honesty (well, with maybe a smidgen of irony). That was a great handle and, given your hanging out in the bucolic great outdoors and enjoying a simple, sustainable lifestyle, it fits perfectly.
I could also suggest “Swab Jockey”, but that might get misinterpreted.
November 4, 2010 at 11:49 AM #627431Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell]It happens everytime I contemplate going back to “Rustico” with my screen name.[/quote]
Rus: You should go back to “Rustico” and I say that in all honesty (well, with maybe a smidgen of irony). That was a great handle and, given your hanging out in the bucolic great outdoors and enjoying a simple, sustainable lifestyle, it fits perfectly.
I could also suggest “Swab Jockey”, but that might get misinterpreted.
November 4, 2010 at 11:49 AM #627743Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Russell]It happens everytime I contemplate going back to “Rustico” with my screen name.[/quote]
Rus: You should go back to “Rustico” and I say that in all honesty (well, with maybe a smidgen of irony). That was a great handle and, given your hanging out in the bucolic great outdoors and enjoying a simple, sustainable lifestyle, it fits perfectly.
I could also suggest “Swab Jockey”, but that might get misinterpreted.
November 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM #626683Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=jstoesz]Allan, I fixed it for you!
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
He’s now added Reductio Ad *Hilarium* to his bag of tricks.[/quote]
I fear that it is unintentional though.
I did appreciate the combination of latin and hitler, I had no idea it was a real term. outstanding![/quote]
J: Yup, in speech and debate it holds even less water than red herrings, strawmen or ad hominem. When you fire the Hitler shot, its pretty much an admission that you’ve lost.
For someone who isn’t skilled in argument or reasoning, you’ll notice pretty consistent use of ad hominem (“You’re an idiot; You’re retarded”), along with the use of non-credible sources, and specious “facts”.
BigGubment employs a hit-and-run style, and you’ll notice never responds with actual facts or a reasoned argument. He can’t.
November 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM #626763Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=jstoesz]Allan, I fixed it for you!
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
He’s now added Reductio Ad *Hilarium* to his bag of tricks.[/quote]
I fear that it is unintentional though.
I did appreciate the combination of latin and hitler, I had no idea it was a real term. outstanding![/quote]
J: Yup, in speech and debate it holds even less water than red herrings, strawmen or ad hominem. When you fire the Hitler shot, its pretty much an admission that you’ve lost.
For someone who isn’t skilled in argument or reasoning, you’ll notice pretty consistent use of ad hominem (“You’re an idiot; You’re retarded”), along with the use of non-credible sources, and specious “facts”.
BigGubment employs a hit-and-run style, and you’ll notice never responds with actual facts or a reasoned argument. He can’t.
November 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM #627318Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=jstoesz]Allan, I fixed it for you!
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
He’s now added Reductio Ad *Hilarium* to his bag of tricks.[/quote]
I fear that it is unintentional though.
I did appreciate the combination of latin and hitler, I had no idea it was a real term. outstanding![/quote]
J: Yup, in speech and debate it holds even less water than red herrings, strawmen or ad hominem. When you fire the Hitler shot, its pretty much an admission that you’ve lost.
For someone who isn’t skilled in argument or reasoning, you’ll notice pretty consistent use of ad hominem (“You’re an idiot; You’re retarded”), along with the use of non-credible sources, and specious “facts”.
BigGubment employs a hit-and-run style, and you’ll notice never responds with actual facts or a reasoned argument. He can’t.
November 4, 2010 at 11:54 AM #627441Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=jstoesz]Allan, I fixed it for you!
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
He’s now added Reductio Ad *Hilarium* to his bag of tricks.[/quote]
I fear that it is unintentional though.
I did appreciate the combination of latin and hitler, I had no idea it was a real term. outstanding![/quote]
J: Yup, in speech and debate it holds even less water than red herrings, strawmen or ad hominem. When you fire the Hitler shot, its pretty much an admission that you’ve lost.
For someone who isn’t skilled in argument or reasoning, you’ll notice pretty consistent use of ad hominem (“You’re an idiot; You’re retarded”), along with the use of non-credible sources, and specious “facts”.
BigGubment employs a hit-and-run style, and you’ll notice never responds with actual facts or a reasoned argument. He can’t.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.