- This topic has 183 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 30, 2011 at 8:04 AM #727251August 30, 2011 at 11:17 AM #726169UCGalParticipant
I can relate to your desire to retire and spend more time with your family and pursuing interests not related to making money. I’ve been running the numbers regularly for a similar goal.
Difference is that I’m 10 years older, have my house *almost* paid off, and have more of a nest egg. My net worth is somewhat of a myth because a large chunk of the “net worth” is my house – and you can’t spend a house. But on paper, my net worth looks good.
I use the quicken planning tools to “what-if”. I run the numbers obsessively. I can’t figure out a way to work unless I can figure out a cheaper option for healthcare… Insurance is the budget killer. My husband has just over 5 years till medicare age, I have just over 15. We have kids that have 8-10 years till they start college – so we have to insure them for the long haul too.
I’ve got an option most don’t have… My husband and kids are in process of being recognized as dual Italian citizens… and some (not all) of the southern regions let you buy into the national healthcare for a very low amount ($1200/year vs per month). But as most of us know… Italy (and the other PIIGS countries) isn’t in the best fiscal shape… so I don’t feel confident banking on that solution to the budget busting healthcare.
I strongly suggest you get a good comprehensive tool and forecast various scenarios. Forecast what happens in down markets. Forecast what happens if insurance goes up to much. Forecast college costs for your kids. Forecast what happens if inflation happens bigtime.
For me – I need to have the house paid off and close to 2M in various savings/investments. With the market fluctuations of the past couple of years… I may have to up that number… I’m not comfortable with the idea of running out of money before I die.
My maternal grandfather retired at 55. They thought his pension and soc.sec. would be more than enough. 6 years later, my grandmother had to take a job as a “shop girl” for a downtown La Jolla gift shop… Anyone who remembers the 70’s remembers the inflation…. and how people on fixed incomes were hit hard.
Keep the dream – but run the numbers and save aggressively.
August 30, 2011 at 11:17 AM #726254UCGalParticipantI can relate to your desire to retire and spend more time with your family and pursuing interests not related to making money. I’ve been running the numbers regularly for a similar goal.
Difference is that I’m 10 years older, have my house *almost* paid off, and have more of a nest egg. My net worth is somewhat of a myth because a large chunk of the “net worth” is my house – and you can’t spend a house. But on paper, my net worth looks good.
I use the quicken planning tools to “what-if”. I run the numbers obsessively. I can’t figure out a way to work unless I can figure out a cheaper option for healthcare… Insurance is the budget killer. My husband has just over 5 years till medicare age, I have just over 15. We have kids that have 8-10 years till they start college – so we have to insure them for the long haul too.
I’ve got an option most don’t have… My husband and kids are in process of being recognized as dual Italian citizens… and some (not all) of the southern regions let you buy into the national healthcare for a very low amount ($1200/year vs per month). But as most of us know… Italy (and the other PIIGS countries) isn’t in the best fiscal shape… so I don’t feel confident banking on that solution to the budget busting healthcare.
I strongly suggest you get a good comprehensive tool and forecast various scenarios. Forecast what happens in down markets. Forecast what happens if insurance goes up to much. Forecast college costs for your kids. Forecast what happens if inflation happens bigtime.
For me – I need to have the house paid off and close to 2M in various savings/investments. With the market fluctuations of the past couple of years… I may have to up that number… I’m not comfortable with the idea of running out of money before I die.
My maternal grandfather retired at 55. They thought his pension and soc.sec. would be more than enough. 6 years later, my grandmother had to take a job as a “shop girl” for a downtown La Jolla gift shop… Anyone who remembers the 70’s remembers the inflation…. and how people on fixed incomes were hit hard.
Keep the dream – but run the numbers and save aggressively.
August 30, 2011 at 11:17 AM #726855UCGalParticipantI can relate to your desire to retire and spend more time with your family and pursuing interests not related to making money. I’ve been running the numbers regularly for a similar goal.
Difference is that I’m 10 years older, have my house *almost* paid off, and have more of a nest egg. My net worth is somewhat of a myth because a large chunk of the “net worth” is my house – and you can’t spend a house. But on paper, my net worth looks good.
I use the quicken planning tools to “what-if”. I run the numbers obsessively. I can’t figure out a way to work unless I can figure out a cheaper option for healthcare… Insurance is the budget killer. My husband has just over 5 years till medicare age, I have just over 15. We have kids that have 8-10 years till they start college – so we have to insure them for the long haul too.
I’ve got an option most don’t have… My husband and kids are in process of being recognized as dual Italian citizens… and some (not all) of the southern regions let you buy into the national healthcare for a very low amount ($1200/year vs per month). But as most of us know… Italy (and the other PIIGS countries) isn’t in the best fiscal shape… so I don’t feel confident banking on that solution to the budget busting healthcare.
I strongly suggest you get a good comprehensive tool and forecast various scenarios. Forecast what happens in down markets. Forecast what happens if insurance goes up to much. Forecast college costs for your kids. Forecast what happens if inflation happens bigtime.
For me – I need to have the house paid off and close to 2M in various savings/investments. With the market fluctuations of the past couple of years… I may have to up that number… I’m not comfortable with the idea of running out of money before I die.
My maternal grandfather retired at 55. They thought his pension and soc.sec. would be more than enough. 6 years later, my grandmother had to take a job as a “shop girl” for a downtown La Jolla gift shop… Anyone who remembers the 70’s remembers the inflation…. and how people on fixed incomes were hit hard.
Keep the dream – but run the numbers and save aggressively.
August 30, 2011 at 11:17 AM #727013UCGalParticipantI can relate to your desire to retire and spend more time with your family and pursuing interests not related to making money. I’ve been running the numbers regularly for a similar goal.
Difference is that I’m 10 years older, have my house *almost* paid off, and have more of a nest egg. My net worth is somewhat of a myth because a large chunk of the “net worth” is my house – and you can’t spend a house. But on paper, my net worth looks good.
I use the quicken planning tools to “what-if”. I run the numbers obsessively. I can’t figure out a way to work unless I can figure out a cheaper option for healthcare… Insurance is the budget killer. My husband has just over 5 years till medicare age, I have just over 15. We have kids that have 8-10 years till they start college – so we have to insure them for the long haul too.
I’ve got an option most don’t have… My husband and kids are in process of being recognized as dual Italian citizens… and some (not all) of the southern regions let you buy into the national healthcare for a very low amount ($1200/year vs per month). But as most of us know… Italy (and the other PIIGS countries) isn’t in the best fiscal shape… so I don’t feel confident banking on that solution to the budget busting healthcare.
I strongly suggest you get a good comprehensive tool and forecast various scenarios. Forecast what happens in down markets. Forecast what happens if insurance goes up to much. Forecast college costs for your kids. Forecast what happens if inflation happens bigtime.
For me – I need to have the house paid off and close to 2M in various savings/investments. With the market fluctuations of the past couple of years… I may have to up that number… I’m not comfortable with the idea of running out of money before I die.
My maternal grandfather retired at 55. They thought his pension and soc.sec. would be more than enough. 6 years later, my grandmother had to take a job as a “shop girl” for a downtown La Jolla gift shop… Anyone who remembers the 70’s remembers the inflation…. and how people on fixed incomes were hit hard.
Keep the dream – but run the numbers and save aggressively.
August 30, 2011 at 11:17 AM #727383UCGalParticipantI can relate to your desire to retire and spend more time with your family and pursuing interests not related to making money. I’ve been running the numbers regularly for a similar goal.
Difference is that I’m 10 years older, have my house *almost* paid off, and have more of a nest egg. My net worth is somewhat of a myth because a large chunk of the “net worth” is my house – and you can’t spend a house. But on paper, my net worth looks good.
I use the quicken planning tools to “what-if”. I run the numbers obsessively. I can’t figure out a way to work unless I can figure out a cheaper option for healthcare… Insurance is the budget killer. My husband has just over 5 years till medicare age, I have just over 15. We have kids that have 8-10 years till they start college – so we have to insure them for the long haul too.
I’ve got an option most don’t have… My husband and kids are in process of being recognized as dual Italian citizens… and some (not all) of the southern regions let you buy into the national healthcare for a very low amount ($1200/year vs per month). But as most of us know… Italy (and the other PIIGS countries) isn’t in the best fiscal shape… so I don’t feel confident banking on that solution to the budget busting healthcare.
I strongly suggest you get a good comprehensive tool and forecast various scenarios. Forecast what happens in down markets. Forecast what happens if insurance goes up to much. Forecast college costs for your kids. Forecast what happens if inflation happens bigtime.
For me – I need to have the house paid off and close to 2M in various savings/investments. With the market fluctuations of the past couple of years… I may have to up that number… I’m not comfortable with the idea of running out of money before I die.
My maternal grandfather retired at 55. They thought his pension and soc.sec. would be more than enough. 6 years later, my grandmother had to take a job as a “shop girl” for a downtown La Jolla gift shop… Anyone who remembers the 70’s remembers the inflation…. and how people on fixed incomes were hit hard.
Keep the dream – but run the numbers and save aggressively.
August 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM #726179svelteParticipantI don’t think you’ve adequately taken into account the effects of inflation over the next 40 years, which at 40 years old is about how much longer you can expect to live.
The average wage in 2010 was about $40K/yr, so with $1.5M you have saved 37.5 times the average yearly wage.
Let’s wind the clock back 40 years from 2010…to the year 1970. The average wage in 1970 was $7.5K/yr, so someone who stood in your shoes back then would have saved the equivalent 37.5 times the average wage, had $281K and retired at 40. If they were taking out the 5% estimated earnings (your number) every year on that, they would be living on $14K a year. Which would probably have been okay in 1970, but now 40 years down the line that would be very uncomfortable.
Electricity, food, insurance, gas, everything would come out of that thousand dollars a month. No money would be left to do anything else.
I vote with flu, keep working as long as you can. 40 years can throw you many curve balls, some of which might take away your opportunity to go back to work. Keep shoveling money away and find work that you like. It doesn’t have to mean 10-12 hour days, maybe find something that is 30-40 hrs/week.
August 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM #726264svelteParticipantI don’t think you’ve adequately taken into account the effects of inflation over the next 40 years, which at 40 years old is about how much longer you can expect to live.
The average wage in 2010 was about $40K/yr, so with $1.5M you have saved 37.5 times the average yearly wage.
Let’s wind the clock back 40 years from 2010…to the year 1970. The average wage in 1970 was $7.5K/yr, so someone who stood in your shoes back then would have saved the equivalent 37.5 times the average wage, had $281K and retired at 40. If they were taking out the 5% estimated earnings (your number) every year on that, they would be living on $14K a year. Which would probably have been okay in 1970, but now 40 years down the line that would be very uncomfortable.
Electricity, food, insurance, gas, everything would come out of that thousand dollars a month. No money would be left to do anything else.
I vote with flu, keep working as long as you can. 40 years can throw you many curve balls, some of which might take away your opportunity to go back to work. Keep shoveling money away and find work that you like. It doesn’t have to mean 10-12 hour days, maybe find something that is 30-40 hrs/week.
August 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM #726864svelteParticipantI don’t think you’ve adequately taken into account the effects of inflation over the next 40 years, which at 40 years old is about how much longer you can expect to live.
The average wage in 2010 was about $40K/yr, so with $1.5M you have saved 37.5 times the average yearly wage.
Let’s wind the clock back 40 years from 2010…to the year 1970. The average wage in 1970 was $7.5K/yr, so someone who stood in your shoes back then would have saved the equivalent 37.5 times the average wage, had $281K and retired at 40. If they were taking out the 5% estimated earnings (your number) every year on that, they would be living on $14K a year. Which would probably have been okay in 1970, but now 40 years down the line that would be very uncomfortable.
Electricity, food, insurance, gas, everything would come out of that thousand dollars a month. No money would be left to do anything else.
I vote with flu, keep working as long as you can. 40 years can throw you many curve balls, some of which might take away your opportunity to go back to work. Keep shoveling money away and find work that you like. It doesn’t have to mean 10-12 hour days, maybe find something that is 30-40 hrs/week.
August 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM #727023svelteParticipantI don’t think you’ve adequately taken into account the effects of inflation over the next 40 years, which at 40 years old is about how much longer you can expect to live.
The average wage in 2010 was about $40K/yr, so with $1.5M you have saved 37.5 times the average yearly wage.
Let’s wind the clock back 40 years from 2010…to the year 1970. The average wage in 1970 was $7.5K/yr, so someone who stood in your shoes back then would have saved the equivalent 37.5 times the average wage, had $281K and retired at 40. If they were taking out the 5% estimated earnings (your number) every year on that, they would be living on $14K a year. Which would probably have been okay in 1970, but now 40 years down the line that would be very uncomfortable.
Electricity, food, insurance, gas, everything would come out of that thousand dollars a month. No money would be left to do anything else.
I vote with flu, keep working as long as you can. 40 years can throw you many curve balls, some of which might take away your opportunity to go back to work. Keep shoveling money away and find work that you like. It doesn’t have to mean 10-12 hour days, maybe find something that is 30-40 hrs/week.
August 30, 2011 at 11:24 AM #727394svelteParticipantI don’t think you’ve adequately taken into account the effects of inflation over the next 40 years, which at 40 years old is about how much longer you can expect to live.
The average wage in 2010 was about $40K/yr, so with $1.5M you have saved 37.5 times the average yearly wage.
Let’s wind the clock back 40 years from 2010…to the year 1970. The average wage in 1970 was $7.5K/yr, so someone who stood in your shoes back then would have saved the equivalent 37.5 times the average wage, had $281K and retired at 40. If they were taking out the 5% estimated earnings (your number) every year on that, they would be living on $14K a year. Which would probably have been okay in 1970, but now 40 years down the line that would be very uncomfortable.
Electricity, food, insurance, gas, everything would come out of that thousand dollars a month. No money would be left to do anything else.
I vote with flu, keep working as long as you can. 40 years can throw you many curve balls, some of which might take away your opportunity to go back to work. Keep shoveling money away and find work that you like. It doesn’t have to mean 10-12 hour days, maybe find something that is 30-40 hrs/week.
August 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM #726198sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ice9]No, my job isn’t bad.
I just think I would be overall happier if I didn’t have to work. I would have more time to spend with my family, and pursue my own interests.
I’m not sure I see the point of working another 15-20 years just to end up with more possessions and money than I need.
You’re probably right about the 5.5% yield being difficult to achieve. Apparently a 4% withdrawal rate is “safe”. However, I could sleep just fine at night with all the IRA in MO.
Also, my point is I do have enough saved, assuming I can tap income from the IRA.[/quote]
I can’t say if you have enough or not. Here is an idea, though.
What if you pulled out more than just interest from your non_IRA investments until you can take IRA money without penalty ? Take interest plus some captial from your non-IRA investment to give you the income you need.
Obviously, this will deplete the capital, but I’m suggesting you manage it such that after you are allowed to tap into the IRA, you would then take IRA money plus interest on the remaining non-IRA capital.
It all sounds risky to me, but if you can get it to pencil out, it would be a way to avoid the 10% hit.
August 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM #726284sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ice9]No, my job isn’t bad.
I just think I would be overall happier if I didn’t have to work. I would have more time to spend with my family, and pursue my own interests.
I’m not sure I see the point of working another 15-20 years just to end up with more possessions and money than I need.
You’re probably right about the 5.5% yield being difficult to achieve. Apparently a 4% withdrawal rate is “safe”. However, I could sleep just fine at night with all the IRA in MO.
Also, my point is I do have enough saved, assuming I can tap income from the IRA.[/quote]
I can’t say if you have enough or not. Here is an idea, though.
What if you pulled out more than just interest from your non_IRA investments until you can take IRA money without penalty ? Take interest plus some captial from your non-IRA investment to give you the income you need.
Obviously, this will deplete the capital, but I’m suggesting you manage it such that after you are allowed to tap into the IRA, you would then take IRA money plus interest on the remaining non-IRA capital.
It all sounds risky to me, but if you can get it to pencil out, it would be a way to avoid the 10% hit.
August 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM #726884sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ice9]No, my job isn’t bad.
I just think I would be overall happier if I didn’t have to work. I would have more time to spend with my family, and pursue my own interests.
I’m not sure I see the point of working another 15-20 years just to end up with more possessions and money than I need.
You’re probably right about the 5.5% yield being difficult to achieve. Apparently a 4% withdrawal rate is “safe”. However, I could sleep just fine at night with all the IRA in MO.
Also, my point is I do have enough saved, assuming I can tap income from the IRA.[/quote]
I can’t say if you have enough or not. Here is an idea, though.
What if you pulled out more than just interest from your non_IRA investments until you can take IRA money without penalty ? Take interest plus some captial from your non-IRA investment to give you the income you need.
Obviously, this will deplete the capital, but I’m suggesting you manage it such that after you are allowed to tap into the IRA, you would then take IRA money plus interest on the remaining non-IRA capital.
It all sounds risky to me, but if you can get it to pencil out, it would be a way to avoid the 10% hit.
August 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM #727042sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ice9]No, my job isn’t bad.
I just think I would be overall happier if I didn’t have to work. I would have more time to spend with my family, and pursue my own interests.
I’m not sure I see the point of working another 15-20 years just to end up with more possessions and money than I need.
You’re probably right about the 5.5% yield being difficult to achieve. Apparently a 4% withdrawal rate is “safe”. However, I could sleep just fine at night with all the IRA in MO.
Also, my point is I do have enough saved, assuming I can tap income from the IRA.[/quote]
I can’t say if you have enough or not. Here is an idea, though.
What if you pulled out more than just interest from your non_IRA investments until you can take IRA money without penalty ? Take interest plus some captial from your non-IRA investment to give you the income you need.
Obviously, this will deplete the capital, but I’m suggesting you manage it such that after you are allowed to tap into the IRA, you would then take IRA money plus interest on the remaining non-IRA capital.
It all sounds risky to me, but if you can get it to pencil out, it would be a way to avoid the 10% hit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.