Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › OT: asset allocation
- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by sdsurfer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2011 at 12:26 PM #705937June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #706042paramountParticipant
This is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #707157paramountParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #706792paramountParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #705945paramountParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #706641paramountParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #706047masayakoParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #707162masayakoParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #706797masayakoParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #706646masayakoParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #705950masayakoParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #707261simonbartParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706896simonbartParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706745simonbartParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706148simonbartParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.