Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › OT: asset allocation
- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
sdsurfer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2011 at 12:26 PM #707051June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #705945
paramount
ParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #706042paramount
ParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #706641paramount
ParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #706792paramount
ParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM #707157paramount
ParticipantThis is a very interesting question.
What role would gold and silver have?
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #705950masayako
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #706047masayako
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #706646masayako
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #706797masayako
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM #707162masayako
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]Lack of responses suggests we don’t know what the hell to do, either.[/quote]
Kind of agree to sdduuuude. I am in the same boat. For me, the sensible thing to do is to diversify in stocks/ RE / overseas investment. Whichever gains become fully realized, take it out and put it in another undervalued asset vehicle.
Keep it going. Money got to flow somewhere. We just need to sit tight and be there before it arrives.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706050simonbart
ParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706148simonbart
ParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706745simonbart
ParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
June 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM #706896simonbart
ParticipantI don’t think this is a hard one to answer.
I would suggest a balanced portfolio of low cost index funds consisting of both domestic bonds and stocks & international stocks.
Your asset allocation into each of these classes should really be based on your age and risk tolerance.
The old rule of thumb is your age in bonds (percentage). Many of the large caps companies already have a big international exposure….so take that into consideration when considering your allocation to international funds.
Fidelity and Vanguard have excellent low cost funds index funds.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
