- This topic has 150 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by University City Renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 7, 2008 at 12:06 AM #282796October 7, 2008 at 12:09 AM #282470CA renterParticipant
It’s sort of nice that in these times, there’s going to be a return back to basics.
——————Amen to all of what you just said!!!!
October 7, 2008 at 12:09 AM #282752CA renterParticipantIt’s sort of nice that in these times, there’s going to be a return back to basics.
——————Amen to all of what you just said!!!!
October 7, 2008 at 12:09 AM #282779CA renterParticipantIt’s sort of nice that in these times, there’s going to be a return back to basics.
——————Amen to all of what you just said!!!!
October 7, 2008 at 12:09 AM #282795CA renterParticipantIt’s sort of nice that in these times, there’s going to be a return back to basics.
——————Amen to all of what you just said!!!!
October 7, 2008 at 12:09 AM #282806CA renterParticipantIt’s sort of nice that in these times, there’s going to be a return back to basics.
——————Amen to all of what you just said!!!!
October 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM #282465CoronitaParticipant[quote=justme]Let me try again,
To everyone who is on a tear about “voting against the incumbents”, please stop for a moment and think about what that really means:
1. you will be voting for the Republicans to take over congress.
2. you will be voting against Obama for president if you vote “independent”
Just do the math. Since the Democrats have a majority among the incumbents, you are in effect voting Republican. Is that really what you want to do?
One thing is to vote against the incumbents in a PRIMARY (nominational) election, but it is something different to vote against the incumbents in the GENERAL (real) election.
[/quote]
So, if a republican does something wrong, they should be thrown out. But if a democrat does something wrong, we should ignore it? I thought the point of voting out the incumbents that voted for the bill was to toss out the cancer, irrespective of party affiliation.
October 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM #282747CoronitaParticipant[quote=justme]Let me try again,
To everyone who is on a tear about “voting against the incumbents”, please stop for a moment and think about what that really means:
1. you will be voting for the Republicans to take over congress.
2. you will be voting against Obama for president if you vote “independent”
Just do the math. Since the Democrats have a majority among the incumbents, you are in effect voting Republican. Is that really what you want to do?
One thing is to vote against the incumbents in a PRIMARY (nominational) election, but it is something different to vote against the incumbents in the GENERAL (real) election.
[/quote]
So, if a republican does something wrong, they should be thrown out. But if a democrat does something wrong, we should ignore it? I thought the point of voting out the incumbents that voted for the bill was to toss out the cancer, irrespective of party affiliation.
October 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM #282774CoronitaParticipant[quote=justme]Let me try again,
To everyone who is on a tear about “voting against the incumbents”, please stop for a moment and think about what that really means:
1. you will be voting for the Republicans to take over congress.
2. you will be voting against Obama for president if you vote “independent”
Just do the math. Since the Democrats have a majority among the incumbents, you are in effect voting Republican. Is that really what you want to do?
One thing is to vote against the incumbents in a PRIMARY (nominational) election, but it is something different to vote against the incumbents in the GENERAL (real) election.
[/quote]
So, if a republican does something wrong, they should be thrown out. But if a democrat does something wrong, we should ignore it? I thought the point of voting out the incumbents that voted for the bill was to toss out the cancer, irrespective of party affiliation.
October 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM #282790CoronitaParticipant[quote=justme]Let me try again,
To everyone who is on a tear about “voting against the incumbents”, please stop for a moment and think about what that really means:
1. you will be voting for the Republicans to take over congress.
2. you will be voting against Obama for president if you vote “independent”
Just do the math. Since the Democrats have a majority among the incumbents, you are in effect voting Republican. Is that really what you want to do?
One thing is to vote against the incumbents in a PRIMARY (nominational) election, but it is something different to vote against the incumbents in the GENERAL (real) election.
[/quote]
So, if a republican does something wrong, they should be thrown out. But if a democrat does something wrong, we should ignore it? I thought the point of voting out the incumbents that voted for the bill was to toss out the cancer, irrespective of party affiliation.
October 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM #282801CoronitaParticipant[quote=justme]Let me try again,
To everyone who is on a tear about “voting against the incumbents”, please stop for a moment and think about what that really means:
1. you will be voting for the Republicans to take over congress.
2. you will be voting against Obama for president if you vote “independent”
Just do the math. Since the Democrats have a majority among the incumbents, you are in effect voting Republican. Is that really what you want to do?
One thing is to vote against the incumbents in a PRIMARY (nominational) election, but it is something different to vote against the incumbents in the GENERAL (real) election.
[/quote]
So, if a republican does something wrong, they should be thrown out. But if a democrat does something wrong, we should ignore it? I thought the point of voting out the incumbents that voted for the bill was to toss out the cancer, irrespective of party affiliation.
October 7, 2008 at 12:20 AM #282475CoronitaParticipant…and Dear Fed,
Please tell me how I can tap into those low interest business loan that will be subsidized by our taxpayers you’re proposing…Because, if I can’t beat the system, please let me join it 🙂
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081007/fed_credit_crisis.html
Fed eyes plan to fund short-term business loans
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government is weighing a bold plan to buy massive amounts of unsecured short-term debts in a dramatic effort to break through a credit clog that is imperiling the economy.The Federal Reserve is working with the Treasury Department on the plan to buy “commercial paper,” a short-term financing mechanism that many companies rely on to finance their day-to-day operations, such as purchasing supplies or making payrolls, according to a person with knowledge of the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the plan is still being put together.
October 7, 2008 at 12:20 AM #282757CoronitaParticipant…and Dear Fed,
Please tell me how I can tap into those low interest business loan that will be subsidized by our taxpayers you’re proposing…Because, if I can’t beat the system, please let me join it 🙂
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081007/fed_credit_crisis.html
Fed eyes plan to fund short-term business loans
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government is weighing a bold plan to buy massive amounts of unsecured short-term debts in a dramatic effort to break through a credit clog that is imperiling the economy.The Federal Reserve is working with the Treasury Department on the plan to buy “commercial paper,” a short-term financing mechanism that many companies rely on to finance their day-to-day operations, such as purchasing supplies or making payrolls, according to a person with knowledge of the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the plan is still being put together.
October 7, 2008 at 12:20 AM #282784CoronitaParticipant…and Dear Fed,
Please tell me how I can tap into those low interest business loan that will be subsidized by our taxpayers you’re proposing…Because, if I can’t beat the system, please let me join it 🙂
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081007/fed_credit_crisis.html
Fed eyes plan to fund short-term business loans
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government is weighing a bold plan to buy massive amounts of unsecured short-term debts in a dramatic effort to break through a credit clog that is imperiling the economy.The Federal Reserve is working with the Treasury Department on the plan to buy “commercial paper,” a short-term financing mechanism that many companies rely on to finance their day-to-day operations, such as purchasing supplies or making payrolls, according to a person with knowledge of the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the plan is still being put together.
October 7, 2008 at 12:20 AM #282800CoronitaParticipant…and Dear Fed,
Please tell me how I can tap into those low interest business loan that will be subsidized by our taxpayers you’re proposing…Because, if I can’t beat the system, please let me join it 🙂
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081007/fed_credit_crisis.html
Fed eyes plan to fund short-term business loans
WASHINGTON (AP) — The government is weighing a bold plan to buy massive amounts of unsecured short-term debts in a dramatic effort to break through a credit clog that is imperiling the economy.The Federal Reserve is working with the Treasury Department on the plan to buy “commercial paper,” a short-term financing mechanism that many companies rely on to finance their day-to-day operations, such as purchasing supplies or making payrolls, according to a person with knowledge of the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the plan is still being put together.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.