- This topic has 50 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by Veritas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 8, 2011 at 1:50 AM #685582April 8, 2011 at 9:12 PM #685772ucodegenParticipant
[quote Eugene]They saw gold 550 feet below the surface and 200 feet west of the spot labelled “RES10-59,60,61”.
Hole 60 saw gold, most other holes weren’t deep enough. It looks like only 52 and 54 had any real chance of finding gold, if it’s in that general area, more than 500 ft. below the surficae.[/quote]
I was not completely discounting the gold, but I was more worried about the pattern of drilling as well as how they were playing up the gold. I checked the prices on ‘crawler core-drillers’. Just under $200k for a good one that will drill 1000 meters down. In the mean time, they burned over $1mil for a year and not many cores to show for it. They have also ‘repeated’ several cores and limited their depth as well as traveling patterns more likely to yield a core with some rare earths as opposed to using the core drilling to determine extent, size and layout of the field. BTW crawler core-drillers can run straight up the hill, drilling cores. They are basically a core driller with a dozer styled drive system.April 8, 2011 at 9:12 PM #684952ucodegenParticipant[quote Eugene]They saw gold 550 feet below the surface and 200 feet west of the spot labelled “RES10-59,60,61”.
Hole 60 saw gold, most other holes weren’t deep enough. It looks like only 52 and 54 had any real chance of finding gold, if it’s in that general area, more than 500 ft. below the surficae.[/quote]
I was not completely discounting the gold, but I was more worried about the pattern of drilling as well as how they were playing up the gold. I checked the prices on ‘crawler core-drillers’. Just under $200k for a good one that will drill 1000 meters down. In the mean time, they burned over $1mil for a year and not many cores to show for it. They have also ‘repeated’ several cores and limited their depth as well as traveling patterns more likely to yield a core with some rare earths as opposed to using the core drilling to determine extent, size and layout of the field. BTW crawler core-drillers can run straight up the hill, drilling cores. They are basically a core driller with a dozer styled drive system.April 8, 2011 at 9:12 PM #685630ucodegenParticipant[quote Eugene]They saw gold 550 feet below the surface and 200 feet west of the spot labelled “RES10-59,60,61”.
Hole 60 saw gold, most other holes weren’t deep enough. It looks like only 52 and 54 had any real chance of finding gold, if it’s in that general area, more than 500 ft. below the surficae.[/quote]
I was not completely discounting the gold, but I was more worried about the pattern of drilling as well as how they were playing up the gold. I checked the prices on ‘crawler core-drillers’. Just under $200k for a good one that will drill 1000 meters down. In the mean time, they burned over $1mil for a year and not many cores to show for it. They have also ‘repeated’ several cores and limited their depth as well as traveling patterns more likely to yield a core with some rare earths as opposed to using the core drilling to determine extent, size and layout of the field. BTW crawler core-drillers can run straight up the hill, drilling cores. They are basically a core driller with a dozer styled drive system.April 8, 2011 at 9:12 PM #686122ucodegenParticipant[quote Eugene]They saw gold 550 feet below the surface and 200 feet west of the spot labelled “RES10-59,60,61”.
Hole 60 saw gold, most other holes weren’t deep enough. It looks like only 52 and 54 had any real chance of finding gold, if it’s in that general area, more than 500 ft. below the surficae.[/quote]
I was not completely discounting the gold, but I was more worried about the pattern of drilling as well as how they were playing up the gold. I checked the prices on ‘crawler core-drillers’. Just under $200k for a good one that will drill 1000 meters down. In the mean time, they burned over $1mil for a year and not many cores to show for it. They have also ‘repeated’ several cores and limited their depth as well as traveling patterns more likely to yield a core with some rare earths as opposed to using the core drilling to determine extent, size and layout of the field. BTW crawler core-drillers can run straight up the hill, drilling cores. They are basically a core driller with a dozer styled drive system.April 8, 2011 at 9:12 PM #685003ucodegenParticipant[quote Eugene]They saw gold 550 feet below the surface and 200 feet west of the spot labelled “RES10-59,60,61”.
Hole 60 saw gold, most other holes weren’t deep enough. It looks like only 52 and 54 had any real chance of finding gold, if it’s in that general area, more than 500 ft. below the surficae.[/quote]
I was not completely discounting the gold, but I was more worried about the pattern of drilling as well as how they were playing up the gold. I checked the prices on ‘crawler core-drillers’. Just under $200k for a good one that will drill 1000 meters down. In the mean time, they burned over $1mil for a year and not many cores to show for it. They have also ‘repeated’ several cores and limited their depth as well as traveling patterns more likely to yield a core with some rare earths as opposed to using the core drilling to determine extent, size and layout of the field. BTW crawler core-drillers can run straight up the hill, drilling cores. They are basically a core driller with a dozer styled drive system.April 15, 2011 at 8:06 AM #687167CoronitaParticipantOk.. I’m out at $16.45… This article scared me….
http://seekingalpha.com/article/253132-why-rare-element-resources-is-unlikely-to-ever-mine-rees
True or false, too much speculation for my blood…
April 15, 2011 at 8:06 AM #688276CoronitaParticipantOk.. I’m out at $16.45… This article scared me….
http://seekingalpha.com/article/253132-why-rare-element-resources-is-unlikely-to-ever-mine-rees
True or false, too much speculation for my blood…
April 15, 2011 at 8:06 AM #687926CoronitaParticipantOk.. I’m out at $16.45… This article scared me….
http://seekingalpha.com/article/253132-why-rare-element-resources-is-unlikely-to-ever-mine-rees
True or false, too much speculation for my blood…
April 15, 2011 at 8:06 AM #687786CoronitaParticipantOk.. I’m out at $16.45… This article scared me….
http://seekingalpha.com/article/253132-why-rare-element-resources-is-unlikely-to-ever-mine-rees
True or false, too much speculation for my blood…
April 15, 2011 at 8:06 AM #687111CoronitaParticipantOk.. I’m out at $16.45… This article scared me….
http://seekingalpha.com/article/253132-why-rare-element-resources-is-unlikely-to-ever-mine-rees
True or false, too much speculation for my blood…
April 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM #687257BubblesitterParticipantThere is huge amount of speculation going on, be careful.
I have trailing stop sell orders on all my rare earth stocks.
Locking in gains and protecting downside risks. I’ve been riding them up, in case of MCP, over 89% return. Sell order kicks in after 10% loss.April 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM #687875BubblesitterParticipantThere is huge amount of speculation going on, be careful.
I have trailing stop sell orders on all my rare earth stocks.
Locking in gains and protecting downside risks. I’ve been riding them up, in case of MCP, over 89% return. Sell order kicks in after 10% loss.April 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM #687200BubblesitterParticipantThere is huge amount of speculation going on, be careful.
I have trailing stop sell orders on all my rare earth stocks.
Locking in gains and protecting downside risks. I’ve been riding them up, in case of MCP, over 89% return. Sell order kicks in after 10% loss.April 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM #688016BubblesitterParticipantThere is huge amount of speculation going on, be careful.
I have trailing stop sell orders on all my rare earth stocks.
Locking in gains and protecting downside risks. I’ve been riding them up, in case of MCP, over 89% return. Sell order kicks in after 10% loss. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.