- This topic has 900 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
surveyor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 22, 2008 at 11:54 PM #245217July 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM #245015
Allan from Fallbrook
Participantgandalf: Wow. That last hairpin turn was a doozy! Campbell on Lebowski, huh? Yeah, that would be worthwhile to delve into.
Of course, I’d need a couple rips outta that bowl you been bogarting, dude.
Tell me it’s indica.
July 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM #245159Participantgandalf: Wow. That last hairpin turn was a doozy! Campbell on Lebowski, huh? Yeah, that would be worthwhile to delve into.
Of course, I’d need a couple rips outta that bowl you been bogarting, dude.
Tell me it’s indica.
July 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM #245168Participantgandalf: Wow. That last hairpin turn was a doozy! Campbell on Lebowski, huh? Yeah, that would be worthwhile to delve into.
Of course, I’d need a couple rips outta that bowl you been bogarting, dude.
Tell me it’s indica.
July 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM #245223Participantgandalf: Wow. That last hairpin turn was a doozy! Campbell on Lebowski, huh? Yeah, that would be worthwhile to delve into.
Of course, I’d need a couple rips outta that bowl you been bogarting, dude.
Tell me it’s indica.
July 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM #245232Participantgandalf: Wow. That last hairpin turn was a doozy! Campbell on Lebowski, huh? Yeah, that would be worthwhile to delve into.
Of course, I’d need a couple rips outta that bowl you been bogarting, dude.
Tell me it’s indica.
July 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM #245205Shadowfax
Participant[quote=surveyor]
gandalf, you have a documented history of attempting to put words in my mouth. You constantly assign me positions that I do not have and assume political stances that I have never advocated. So you’ll have to do better than “oh, I know how to read because I went to Columbia.” And for one thing, I’m not partisan. The fact that you keep bringing it up means that you are partisan yourself, thereby contradicting your claims to be a “moderate.”
I do find it ironic that you assert that you have reading comprehension and then admit that you have difficulty reading my posts. Doesn’t that prove my point about your reading comprehension?
By the way, when you say you “tune out”, that means YOU ARE NOT READING.
So while I’ve already answered your questions ad naueseum, it makes no difference because you’ve already admitted that you are not reading them. So you should try “not posting.” My content stands for itself.
Reading is fundamental.
By the way, (and this is a reading comprehension thing too) I am saying that the question, the labels (of conservative/liberal policies) is IRRELEVANT. That doesn’t mean that what I am posting is IRRELEVANT.
Geez, try reading.
[/quote]
Not to beat a dead horse, Surveyor, but you HAVE said repeatedly that your position on g’s questions re foreign policy options is irrelevant and then spent the rest of each post just taking him to task for several (rather dull and insulting) paragraphs. I think, in all fairness, all g is asking is for you to provide your opinions re foreign policy. That might spark his interest enough to actually read your post.
July 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM #245352Participant[quote=surveyor]
gandalf, you have a documented history of attempting to put words in my mouth. You constantly assign me positions that I do not have and assume political stances that I have never advocated. So you’ll have to do better than “oh, I know how to read because I went to Columbia.” And for one thing, I’m not partisan. The fact that you keep bringing it up means that you are partisan yourself, thereby contradicting your claims to be a “moderate.”
I do find it ironic that you assert that you have reading comprehension and then admit that you have difficulty reading my posts. Doesn’t that prove my point about your reading comprehension?
By the way, when you say you “tune out”, that means YOU ARE NOT READING.
So while I’ve already answered your questions ad naueseum, it makes no difference because you’ve already admitted that you are not reading them. So you should try “not posting.” My content stands for itself.
Reading is fundamental.
By the way, (and this is a reading comprehension thing too) I am saying that the question, the labels (of conservative/liberal policies) is IRRELEVANT. That doesn’t mean that what I am posting is IRRELEVANT.
Geez, try reading.
[/quote]
Not to beat a dead horse, Surveyor, but you HAVE said repeatedly that your position on g’s questions re foreign policy options is irrelevant and then spent the rest of each post just taking him to task for several (rather dull and insulting) paragraphs. I think, in all fairness, all g is asking is for you to provide your opinions re foreign policy. That might spark his interest enough to actually read your post.
July 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM #245360Participant[quote=surveyor]
gandalf, you have a documented history of attempting to put words in my mouth. You constantly assign me positions that I do not have and assume political stances that I have never advocated. So you’ll have to do better than “oh, I know how to read because I went to Columbia.” And for one thing, I’m not partisan. The fact that you keep bringing it up means that you are partisan yourself, thereby contradicting your claims to be a “moderate.”
I do find it ironic that you assert that you have reading comprehension and then admit that you have difficulty reading my posts. Doesn’t that prove my point about your reading comprehension?
By the way, when you say you “tune out”, that means YOU ARE NOT READING.
So while I’ve already answered your questions ad naueseum, it makes no difference because you’ve already admitted that you are not reading them. So you should try “not posting.” My content stands for itself.
Reading is fundamental.
By the way, (and this is a reading comprehension thing too) I am saying that the question, the labels (of conservative/liberal policies) is IRRELEVANT. That doesn’t mean that what I am posting is IRRELEVANT.
Geez, try reading.
[/quote]
Not to beat a dead horse, Surveyor, but you HAVE said repeatedly that your position on g’s questions re foreign policy options is irrelevant and then spent the rest of each post just taking him to task for several (rather dull and insulting) paragraphs. I think, in all fairness, all g is asking is for you to provide your opinions re foreign policy. That might spark his interest enough to actually read your post.
July 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM #245416Participant[quote=surveyor]
gandalf, you have a documented history of attempting to put words in my mouth. You constantly assign me positions that I do not have and assume political stances that I have never advocated. So you’ll have to do better than “oh, I know how to read because I went to Columbia.” And for one thing, I’m not partisan. The fact that you keep bringing it up means that you are partisan yourself, thereby contradicting your claims to be a “moderate.”
I do find it ironic that you assert that you have reading comprehension and then admit that you have difficulty reading my posts. Doesn’t that prove my point about your reading comprehension?
By the way, when you say you “tune out”, that means YOU ARE NOT READING.
So while I’ve already answered your questions ad naueseum, it makes no difference because you’ve already admitted that you are not reading them. So you should try “not posting.” My content stands for itself.
Reading is fundamental.
By the way, (and this is a reading comprehension thing too) I am saying that the question, the labels (of conservative/liberal policies) is IRRELEVANT. That doesn’t mean that what I am posting is IRRELEVANT.
Geez, try reading.
[/quote]
Not to beat a dead horse, Surveyor, but you HAVE said repeatedly that your position on g’s questions re foreign policy options is irrelevant and then spent the rest of each post just taking him to task for several (rather dull and insulting) paragraphs. I think, in all fairness, all g is asking is for you to provide your opinions re foreign policy. That might spark his interest enough to actually read your post.
July 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM #245426Participant[quote=surveyor]
gandalf, you have a documented history of attempting to put words in my mouth. You constantly assign me positions that I do not have and assume political stances that I have never advocated. So you’ll have to do better than “oh, I know how to read because I went to Columbia.” And for one thing, I’m not partisan. The fact that you keep bringing it up means that you are partisan yourself, thereby contradicting your claims to be a “moderate.”
I do find it ironic that you assert that you have reading comprehension and then admit that you have difficulty reading my posts. Doesn’t that prove my point about your reading comprehension?
By the way, when you say you “tune out”, that means YOU ARE NOT READING.
So while I’ve already answered your questions ad naueseum, it makes no difference because you’ve already admitted that you are not reading them. So you should try “not posting.” My content stands for itself.
Reading is fundamental.
By the way, (and this is a reading comprehension thing too) I am saying that the question, the labels (of conservative/liberal policies) is IRRELEVANT. That doesn’t mean that what I am posting is IRRELEVANT.
Geez, try reading.
[/quote]
Not to beat a dead horse, Surveyor, but you HAVE said repeatedly that your position on g’s questions re foreign policy options is irrelevant and then spent the rest of each post just taking him to task for several (rather dull and insulting) paragraphs. I think, in all fairness, all g is asking is for you to provide your opinions re foreign policy. That might spark his interest enough to actually read your post.
July 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM #245025Aecetia
ParticipantGood one gandalf. Allan, you’ve got mail.
Resent.
July 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM #245170ParticipantGood one gandalf. Allan, you’ve got mail.
Resent.
July 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM #245178ParticipantGood one gandalf. Allan, you’ve got mail.
Resent.
July 23, 2008 at 11:42 AM #245233ParticipantGood one gandalf. Allan, you’ve got mail.
Resent.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.