Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Opinions requested on life insurance
- This topic has 145 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by waterboy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 23, 2010 at 10:11 PM #544128April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543194CA renterParticipant
[quote=HLS]$1 Million 20 year term. Preferred MALE in CA
starting at
age 25 $425 a year
age 30 $438 a year
age 35 $450 a year
age 40 $645 a yearAt age 25 committing to paying $8,500 over 20 years
for $1 million in coverage doesn’t sound crazy.
The odds are you will waste the money but provide security to your family “just in case”If one had to choose, I’d say that protecting your family is more important than HBO or alcohol or other frivolous expenses.
There might even be a way to have your employer pay your premium with pre-tax dollars. Less than $40 a month.$100K policy is $110 a year.
$500K policy is $250 a year.
Lower coverage seems like a poor choice unless that’s all you can really afford.[/quote]Good advice.
Personally, I’d insure the husband/FTE at $1MM and the wife at $500K — term life, 20 year policies. If you want to add anything to that, it’s just gravy, but that would be my minimum in your situation. Just MHO.
Also, there is another way to get around the issue flu mentioned through trusts. Check with an attorney regarding QTIP trusts:
http://www.finweb.com/retirement/qtip-trusts.html
We have a trust where the assets are split at the time of death and the assets of the deceased go into a separate trust with the living spouse as executor and the children as beneficiaries.
Just something to consider.
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543308CA renterParticipant[quote=HLS]$1 Million 20 year term. Preferred MALE in CA
starting at
age 25 $425 a year
age 30 $438 a year
age 35 $450 a year
age 40 $645 a yearAt age 25 committing to paying $8,500 over 20 years
for $1 million in coverage doesn’t sound crazy.
The odds are you will waste the money but provide security to your family “just in case”If one had to choose, I’d say that protecting your family is more important than HBO or alcohol or other frivolous expenses.
There might even be a way to have your employer pay your premium with pre-tax dollars. Less than $40 a month.$100K policy is $110 a year.
$500K policy is $250 a year.
Lower coverage seems like a poor choice unless that’s all you can really afford.[/quote]Good advice.
Personally, I’d insure the husband/FTE at $1MM and the wife at $500K — term life, 20 year policies. If you want to add anything to that, it’s just gravy, but that would be my minimum in your situation. Just MHO.
Also, there is another way to get around the issue flu mentioned through trusts. Check with an attorney regarding QTIP trusts:
http://www.finweb.com/retirement/qtip-trusts.html
We have a trust where the assets are split at the time of death and the assets of the deceased go into a separate trust with the living spouse as executor and the children as beneficiaries.
Just something to consider.
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543783CA renterParticipant[quote=HLS]$1 Million 20 year term. Preferred MALE in CA
starting at
age 25 $425 a year
age 30 $438 a year
age 35 $450 a year
age 40 $645 a yearAt age 25 committing to paying $8,500 over 20 years
for $1 million in coverage doesn’t sound crazy.
The odds are you will waste the money but provide security to your family “just in case”If one had to choose, I’d say that protecting your family is more important than HBO or alcohol or other frivolous expenses.
There might even be a way to have your employer pay your premium with pre-tax dollars. Less than $40 a month.$100K policy is $110 a year.
$500K policy is $250 a year.
Lower coverage seems like a poor choice unless that’s all you can really afford.[/quote]Good advice.
Personally, I’d insure the husband/FTE at $1MM and the wife at $500K — term life, 20 year policies. If you want to add anything to that, it’s just gravy, but that would be my minimum in your situation. Just MHO.
Also, there is another way to get around the issue flu mentioned through trusts. Check with an attorney regarding QTIP trusts:
http://www.finweb.com/retirement/qtip-trusts.html
We have a trust where the assets are split at the time of death and the assets of the deceased go into a separate trust with the living spouse as executor and the children as beneficiaries.
Just something to consider.
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543877CA renterParticipant[quote=HLS]$1 Million 20 year term. Preferred MALE in CA
starting at
age 25 $425 a year
age 30 $438 a year
age 35 $450 a year
age 40 $645 a yearAt age 25 committing to paying $8,500 over 20 years
for $1 million in coverage doesn’t sound crazy.
The odds are you will waste the money but provide security to your family “just in case”If one had to choose, I’d say that protecting your family is more important than HBO or alcohol or other frivolous expenses.
There might even be a way to have your employer pay your premium with pre-tax dollars. Less than $40 a month.$100K policy is $110 a year.
$500K policy is $250 a year.
Lower coverage seems like a poor choice unless that’s all you can really afford.[/quote]Good advice.
Personally, I’d insure the husband/FTE at $1MM and the wife at $500K — term life, 20 year policies. If you want to add anything to that, it’s just gravy, but that would be my minimum in your situation. Just MHO.
Also, there is another way to get around the issue flu mentioned through trusts. Check with an attorney regarding QTIP trusts:
http://www.finweb.com/retirement/qtip-trusts.html
We have a trust where the assets are split at the time of death and the assets of the deceased go into a separate trust with the living spouse as executor and the children as beneficiaries.
Just something to consider.
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #544148CA renterParticipant[quote=HLS]$1 Million 20 year term. Preferred MALE in CA
starting at
age 25 $425 a year
age 30 $438 a year
age 35 $450 a year
age 40 $645 a yearAt age 25 committing to paying $8,500 over 20 years
for $1 million in coverage doesn’t sound crazy.
The odds are you will waste the money but provide security to your family “just in case”If one had to choose, I’d say that protecting your family is more important than HBO or alcohol or other frivolous expenses.
There might even be a way to have your employer pay your premium with pre-tax dollars. Less than $40 a month.$100K policy is $110 a year.
$500K policy is $250 a year.
Lower coverage seems like a poor choice unless that’s all you can really afford.[/quote]Good advice.
Personally, I’d insure the husband/FTE at $1MM and the wife at $500K — term life, 20 year policies. If you want to add anything to that, it’s just gravy, but that would be my minimum in your situation. Just MHO.
Also, there is another way to get around the issue flu mentioned through trusts. Check with an attorney regarding QTIP trusts:
http://www.finweb.com/retirement/qtip-trusts.html
We have a trust where the assets are split at the time of death and the assets of the deceased go into a separate trust with the living spouse as executor and the children as beneficiaries.
Just something to consider.
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543199CA renterParticipantBTW, congratulations on the soon-to-be new addition! π
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543313CA renterParticipantBTW, congratulations on the soon-to-be new addition! π
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543788CA renterParticipantBTW, congratulations on the soon-to-be new addition! π
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #543882CA renterParticipantBTW, congratulations on the soon-to-be new addition! π
April 24, 2010 at 12:36 AM #544153CA renterParticipantBTW, congratulations on the soon-to-be new addition! π
April 24, 2010 at 2:38 AM #543209garysearsParticipantLooks like I’m in the minority with my comfort being underinsured. I have tried to stay away from buying a policy that would mean my wife never would have to work again. Not because I dislike her. Maybe I really am too cheap and should consider more.
If I do get more I won’t tell her though since I don’t want to get knocked off. I can laugh about it but really, how well do I know her? Certainly for 2 million she wouldn’t have to worry about my stingy ways ever again. Even for 1 million she would probably be tempted.
April 24, 2010 at 2:38 AM #543323garysearsParticipantLooks like I’m in the minority with my comfort being underinsured. I have tried to stay away from buying a policy that would mean my wife never would have to work again. Not because I dislike her. Maybe I really am too cheap and should consider more.
If I do get more I won’t tell her though since I don’t want to get knocked off. I can laugh about it but really, how well do I know her? Certainly for 2 million she wouldn’t have to worry about my stingy ways ever again. Even for 1 million she would probably be tempted.
April 24, 2010 at 2:38 AM #543798garysearsParticipantLooks like I’m in the minority with my comfort being underinsured. I have tried to stay away from buying a policy that would mean my wife never would have to work again. Not because I dislike her. Maybe I really am too cheap and should consider more.
If I do get more I won’t tell her though since I don’t want to get knocked off. I can laugh about it but really, how well do I know her? Certainly for 2 million she wouldn’t have to worry about my stingy ways ever again. Even for 1 million she would probably be tempted.
April 24, 2010 at 2:38 AM #543892garysearsParticipantLooks like I’m in the minority with my comfort being underinsured. I have tried to stay away from buying a policy that would mean my wife never would have to work again. Not because I dislike her. Maybe I really am too cheap and should consider more.
If I do get more I won’t tell her though since I don’t want to get knocked off. I can laugh about it but really, how well do I know her? Certainly for 2 million she wouldn’t have to worry about my stingy ways ever again. Even for 1 million she would probably be tempted.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.