Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Opinions requested on life insurance
- This topic has 145 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by waterboy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 23, 2010 at 7:41 PM #544075April 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM #543129RaybyrnesParticipant
The average life insurance policy will lapse after 4 years. I would consider evaluating the possibility of laddering a string of term policies. By this I mean get a 250 K policy (or whatever amount you choose) for 10 years and a 250 for 20 years. That gives you 500k of insurance over the next 10 years and at the end of 10 years look to take out 500 K at that point which would give you 750K for years 10 through 20 and 500 K for years 20 through 30. At the end of that time kids through school and mortgage may be paid off and you have less need for insurance. Make sure the policies are non-cancellable and guaranteed reknewable.
Because you are using the less expensive term policies you should have a greater amount to pack away and with changes to the IRA limits consider putting fully funding the IRA and converting to a Roth which you would need to do because of your income bracket.
If life happens and something happens that requires you drop a policy you still may be able to have some insurance in place using this method.
April 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM #543243RaybyrnesParticipantThe average life insurance policy will lapse after 4 years. I would consider evaluating the possibility of laddering a string of term policies. By this I mean get a 250 K policy (or whatever amount you choose) for 10 years and a 250 for 20 years. That gives you 500k of insurance over the next 10 years and at the end of 10 years look to take out 500 K at that point which would give you 750K for years 10 through 20 and 500 K for years 20 through 30. At the end of that time kids through school and mortgage may be paid off and you have less need for insurance. Make sure the policies are non-cancellable and guaranteed reknewable.
Because you are using the less expensive term policies you should have a greater amount to pack away and with changes to the IRA limits consider putting fully funding the IRA and converting to a Roth which you would need to do because of your income bracket.
If life happens and something happens that requires you drop a policy you still may be able to have some insurance in place using this method.
April 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM #543718RaybyrnesParticipantThe average life insurance policy will lapse after 4 years. I would consider evaluating the possibility of laddering a string of term policies. By this I mean get a 250 K policy (or whatever amount you choose) for 10 years and a 250 for 20 years. That gives you 500k of insurance over the next 10 years and at the end of 10 years look to take out 500 K at that point which would give you 750K for years 10 through 20 and 500 K for years 20 through 30. At the end of that time kids through school and mortgage may be paid off and you have less need for insurance. Make sure the policies are non-cancellable and guaranteed reknewable.
Because you are using the less expensive term policies you should have a greater amount to pack away and with changes to the IRA limits consider putting fully funding the IRA and converting to a Roth which you would need to do because of your income bracket.
If life happens and something happens that requires you drop a policy you still may be able to have some insurance in place using this method.
April 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM #543812RaybyrnesParticipantThe average life insurance policy will lapse after 4 years. I would consider evaluating the possibility of laddering a string of term policies. By this I mean get a 250 K policy (or whatever amount you choose) for 10 years and a 250 for 20 years. That gives you 500k of insurance over the next 10 years and at the end of 10 years look to take out 500 K at that point which would give you 750K for years 10 through 20 and 500 K for years 20 through 30. At the end of that time kids through school and mortgage may be paid off and you have less need for insurance. Make sure the policies are non-cancellable and guaranteed reknewable.
Because you are using the less expensive term policies you should have a greater amount to pack away and with changes to the IRA limits consider putting fully funding the IRA and converting to a Roth which you would need to do because of your income bracket.
If life happens and something happens that requires you drop a policy you still may be able to have some insurance in place using this method.
April 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM #544085RaybyrnesParticipantThe average life insurance policy will lapse after 4 years. I would consider evaluating the possibility of laddering a string of term policies. By this I mean get a 250 K policy (or whatever amount you choose) for 10 years and a 250 for 20 years. That gives you 500k of insurance over the next 10 years and at the end of 10 years look to take out 500 K at that point which would give you 750K for years 10 through 20 and 500 K for years 20 through 30. At the end of that time kids through school and mortgage may be paid off and you have less need for insurance. Make sure the policies are non-cancellable and guaranteed reknewable.
Because you are using the less expensive term policies you should have a greater amount to pack away and with changes to the IRA limits consider putting fully funding the IRA and converting to a Roth which you would need to do because of your income bracket.
If life happens and something happens that requires you drop a policy you still may be able to have some insurance in place using this method.
April 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM #543134HLSParticipantHi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?
April 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM #543248HLSParticipantHi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?
April 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM #543723HLSParticipantHi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?
April 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM #543817HLSParticipantHi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?
April 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM #544089HLSParticipantHi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?
April 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM #543144CoronitaParticipant[quote=HLS]Hi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?[/quote]
Alternatively, you can buy more than one policy, each being smaller amounts, versus 1 large policy. Total upfront premium costs for all policies would be more than a single larger policy, BUT then you can cancel one of your policies as your financial position changes. So for instance rather than buy 1 $1million, buy two $500k, and cancel one if you have built up $500k in reserves. Also insures yourself against an insurer if they go belly up (although unlikely)
April 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM #543258CoronitaParticipant[quote=HLS]Hi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?[/quote]
Alternatively, you can buy more than one policy, each being smaller amounts, versus 1 large policy. Total upfront premium costs for all policies would be more than a single larger policy, BUT then you can cancel one of your policies as your financial position changes. So for instance rather than buy 1 $1million, buy two $500k, and cancel one if you have built up $500k in reserves. Also insures yourself against an insurer if they go belly up (although unlikely)
April 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM #543733CoronitaParticipant[quote=HLS]Hi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?[/quote]
Alternatively, you can buy more than one policy, each being smaller amounts, versus 1 large policy. Total upfront premium costs for all policies would be more than a single larger policy, BUT then you can cancel one of your policies as your financial position changes. So for instance rather than buy 1 $1million, buy two $500k, and cancel one if you have built up $500k in reserves. Also insures yourself against an insurer if they go belly up (although unlikely)
April 23, 2010 at 8:48 PM #543827CoronitaParticipant[quote=HLS]Hi Ray,, interesting strategy but I think that laddering life insurance is pretty risky in itself as you may not qualify for a policy 10 years down the road at all so it also depends on if you want to gamble with coverage, and it’s more expensive to buy the older you get.
Premiums are likely to rise in the future as well.
20 years of coverage starting today may not cost much more than 10 years of coverage starting in 10 years.Perhaps it also depends on whether you plan on winning or losing the bet with the life insurance company.
If you win, the return on a policy is far better than money in a retirement account. If you lose the insurance company gets to keep your money but you are still around to talk about how much you wasted.
The only reason term policies lapse is because people stop paying the premiums.
Is the goal to allow the survivor to live a similar lifestyle or force them to scale down as suggested above ?[/quote]
Alternatively, you can buy more than one policy, each being smaller amounts, versus 1 large policy. Total upfront premium costs for all policies would be more than a single larger policy, BUT then you can cancel one of your policies as your financial position changes. So for instance rather than buy 1 $1million, buy two $500k, and cancel one if you have built up $500k in reserves. Also insures yourself against an insurer if they go belly up (although unlikely)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.