Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Opinions please…
- This topic has 120 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by XBoxBoy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 3, 2009 at 11:16 AM #15602May 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM #392209SD RealtorParticipant
I believe that we will indeed see continued depreciation in the high end market. The question is how much. My wife and I like Birdrock a lot and back in 02 we toyed with the idea of moving there and regretfully did not.
To be honest I think you are overpaying for the home however you are purchasing smack in the middle of a spring rally. if you are intending on holding for 10 years like you implied I tend to think that you will have an opportunity to not be underwater at some point in that timespan. If financial considerations are the only factor then it is a no brainer, do not buy. Only you can measure the decision of lifestyle verses financials. You already mentioned that your current rent is higher then what this payment will be. Did you include property tax as well?
I will tell you that Birdrock is a great place to live. I will also tell you that other opportunities will arise but you will have to be patient. There are always more homes that come along, however the good ones seem to not come along to often. If you are trying to guess what the bottom will be for la jolla and Birdrock…hard to say…right now it is seeing more demand then in the past year or two but I think another 10 to 20 percent is not impossible iF things really crap out.
May 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM #392472SD RealtorParticipantI believe that we will indeed see continued depreciation in the high end market. The question is how much. My wife and I like Birdrock a lot and back in 02 we toyed with the idea of moving there and regretfully did not.
To be honest I think you are overpaying for the home however you are purchasing smack in the middle of a spring rally. if you are intending on holding for 10 years like you implied I tend to think that you will have an opportunity to not be underwater at some point in that timespan. If financial considerations are the only factor then it is a no brainer, do not buy. Only you can measure the decision of lifestyle verses financials. You already mentioned that your current rent is higher then what this payment will be. Did you include property tax as well?
I will tell you that Birdrock is a great place to live. I will also tell you that other opportunities will arise but you will have to be patient. There are always more homes that come along, however the good ones seem to not come along to often. If you are trying to guess what the bottom will be for la jolla and Birdrock…hard to say…right now it is seeing more demand then in the past year or two but I think another 10 to 20 percent is not impossible iF things really crap out.
May 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM #392684SD RealtorParticipantI believe that we will indeed see continued depreciation in the high end market. The question is how much. My wife and I like Birdrock a lot and back in 02 we toyed with the idea of moving there and regretfully did not.
To be honest I think you are overpaying for the home however you are purchasing smack in the middle of a spring rally. if you are intending on holding for 10 years like you implied I tend to think that you will have an opportunity to not be underwater at some point in that timespan. If financial considerations are the only factor then it is a no brainer, do not buy. Only you can measure the decision of lifestyle verses financials. You already mentioned that your current rent is higher then what this payment will be. Did you include property tax as well?
I will tell you that Birdrock is a great place to live. I will also tell you that other opportunities will arise but you will have to be patient. There are always more homes that come along, however the good ones seem to not come along to often. If you are trying to guess what the bottom will be for la jolla and Birdrock…hard to say…right now it is seeing more demand then in the past year or two but I think another 10 to 20 percent is not impossible iF things really crap out.
May 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM #392737SD RealtorParticipantI believe that we will indeed see continued depreciation in the high end market. The question is how much. My wife and I like Birdrock a lot and back in 02 we toyed with the idea of moving there and regretfully did not.
To be honest I think you are overpaying for the home however you are purchasing smack in the middle of a spring rally. if you are intending on holding for 10 years like you implied I tend to think that you will have an opportunity to not be underwater at some point in that timespan. If financial considerations are the only factor then it is a no brainer, do not buy. Only you can measure the decision of lifestyle verses financials. You already mentioned that your current rent is higher then what this payment will be. Did you include property tax as well?
I will tell you that Birdrock is a great place to live. I will also tell you that other opportunities will arise but you will have to be patient. There are always more homes that come along, however the good ones seem to not come along to often. If you are trying to guess what the bottom will be for la jolla and Birdrock…hard to say…right now it is seeing more demand then in the past year or two but I think another 10 to 20 percent is not impossible iF things really crap out.
May 3, 2009 at 11:35 AM #392879SD RealtorParticipantI believe that we will indeed see continued depreciation in the high end market. The question is how much. My wife and I like Birdrock a lot and back in 02 we toyed with the idea of moving there and regretfully did not.
To be honest I think you are overpaying for the home however you are purchasing smack in the middle of a spring rally. if you are intending on holding for 10 years like you implied I tend to think that you will have an opportunity to not be underwater at some point in that timespan. If financial considerations are the only factor then it is a no brainer, do not buy. Only you can measure the decision of lifestyle verses financials. You already mentioned that your current rent is higher then what this payment will be. Did you include property tax as well?
I will tell you that Birdrock is a great place to live. I will also tell you that other opportunities will arise but you will have to be patient. There are always more homes that come along, however the good ones seem to not come along to often. If you are trying to guess what the bottom will be for la jolla and Birdrock…hard to say…right now it is seeing more demand then in the past year or two but I think another 10 to 20 percent is not impossible iF things really crap out.
May 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM #392214AnonymousGuestThe new phase of real estate is the jumbo mortgage group (over $417,000). Jumbo’s now are 35% of foreclosures in California and prime loans are now in more volume than subprime. This is accelerating very rapidly due to problems since October in the stock market. In 2001, the stock market decline helped housing; this time it is the opposite.
I just got my offer accepted on a short sale that was being marketed at over $2.5mil in November and my offer was below $1.2. The appliances were removed but this is a substantial decline. It is 4900 sq feet.
May 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM #392477AnonymousGuestThe new phase of real estate is the jumbo mortgage group (over $417,000). Jumbo’s now are 35% of foreclosures in California and prime loans are now in more volume than subprime. This is accelerating very rapidly due to problems since October in the stock market. In 2001, the stock market decline helped housing; this time it is the opposite.
I just got my offer accepted on a short sale that was being marketed at over $2.5mil in November and my offer was below $1.2. The appliances were removed but this is a substantial decline. It is 4900 sq feet.
May 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM #392689AnonymousGuestThe new phase of real estate is the jumbo mortgage group (over $417,000). Jumbo’s now are 35% of foreclosures in California and prime loans are now in more volume than subprime. This is accelerating very rapidly due to problems since October in the stock market. In 2001, the stock market decline helped housing; this time it is the opposite.
I just got my offer accepted on a short sale that was being marketed at over $2.5mil in November and my offer was below $1.2. The appliances were removed but this is a substantial decline. It is 4900 sq feet.
May 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM #392742AnonymousGuestThe new phase of real estate is the jumbo mortgage group (over $417,000). Jumbo’s now are 35% of foreclosures in California and prime loans are now in more volume than subprime. This is accelerating very rapidly due to problems since October in the stock market. In 2001, the stock market decline helped housing; this time it is the opposite.
I just got my offer accepted on a short sale that was being marketed at over $2.5mil in November and my offer was below $1.2. The appliances were removed but this is a substantial decline. It is 4900 sq feet.
May 3, 2009 at 11:36 AM #392884AnonymousGuestThe new phase of real estate is the jumbo mortgage group (over $417,000). Jumbo’s now are 35% of foreclosures in California and prime loans are now in more volume than subprime. This is accelerating very rapidly due to problems since October in the stock market. In 2001, the stock market decline helped housing; this time it is the opposite.
I just got my offer accepted on a short sale that was being marketed at over $2.5mil in November and my offer was below $1.2. The appliances were removed but this is a substantial decline. It is 4900 sq feet.
May 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM #392219patientrenterParticipantNo one has a crystal ball, so it’s a question of odds. With that, here are my thoughts.
If you want to give yourself the best odds of the best financial outcome, then you should wait. All the negative factors that hit the lower end of the SD market haven’t percolated through to the high end yet. (A few people here think they never will but, as I said, it’s a question of judging the odds…)
Psychologically, it’s a completely different story. Most people who bought houses in the last few years paid with what I will call “Monopoly money”. That’s why they could bring themselves to write a check for $1 million for a dumpy place. For every 100 people who wrote that check, there were only a few who had actually saved most of that money by spending that much less than their net earnings stripped of capital gains. Most of the others borrowed most of the money, expecting to pay the loans back painlessly from a higher future sale price, or they used prior gains from previous home price appreciation (“equity”). It was therefore easy money, and they spent it more freely.
Based on your comments, I am guessing that you have a large pot of money for this next home purchase, and a lot of that money came for substantial prior home price appreciation. Each $1 of your housing pot didn’t come from a $1 saved by scouring the supermarket shelves for good deals, or taking cheap vacations, or some other self-denial. It came from high previous asset price appreciation, which was pretty painless, so it “feels” OK to spend a lot of it without counting the pennies.
With that (cheap, and worth every every penny) psycholgical profile, I’d say that you should just find a place you like, and make sure that a loss of 30% of the price would not exceed your prior gains.
May 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM #392482patientrenterParticipantNo one has a crystal ball, so it’s a question of odds. With that, here are my thoughts.
If you want to give yourself the best odds of the best financial outcome, then you should wait. All the negative factors that hit the lower end of the SD market haven’t percolated through to the high end yet. (A few people here think they never will but, as I said, it’s a question of judging the odds…)
Psychologically, it’s a completely different story. Most people who bought houses in the last few years paid with what I will call “Monopoly money”. That’s why they could bring themselves to write a check for $1 million for a dumpy place. For every 100 people who wrote that check, there were only a few who had actually saved most of that money by spending that much less than their net earnings stripped of capital gains. Most of the others borrowed most of the money, expecting to pay the loans back painlessly from a higher future sale price, or they used prior gains from previous home price appreciation (“equity”). It was therefore easy money, and they spent it more freely.
Based on your comments, I am guessing that you have a large pot of money for this next home purchase, and a lot of that money came for substantial prior home price appreciation. Each $1 of your housing pot didn’t come from a $1 saved by scouring the supermarket shelves for good deals, or taking cheap vacations, or some other self-denial. It came from high previous asset price appreciation, which was pretty painless, so it “feels” OK to spend a lot of it without counting the pennies.
With that (cheap, and worth every every penny) psycholgical profile, I’d say that you should just find a place you like, and make sure that a loss of 30% of the price would not exceed your prior gains.
May 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM #392694patientrenterParticipantNo one has a crystal ball, so it’s a question of odds. With that, here are my thoughts.
If you want to give yourself the best odds of the best financial outcome, then you should wait. All the negative factors that hit the lower end of the SD market haven’t percolated through to the high end yet. (A few people here think they never will but, as I said, it’s a question of judging the odds…)
Psychologically, it’s a completely different story. Most people who bought houses in the last few years paid with what I will call “Monopoly money”. That’s why they could bring themselves to write a check for $1 million for a dumpy place. For every 100 people who wrote that check, there were only a few who had actually saved most of that money by spending that much less than their net earnings stripped of capital gains. Most of the others borrowed most of the money, expecting to pay the loans back painlessly from a higher future sale price, or they used prior gains from previous home price appreciation (“equity”). It was therefore easy money, and they spent it more freely.
Based on your comments, I am guessing that you have a large pot of money for this next home purchase, and a lot of that money came for substantial prior home price appreciation. Each $1 of your housing pot didn’t come from a $1 saved by scouring the supermarket shelves for good deals, or taking cheap vacations, or some other self-denial. It came from high previous asset price appreciation, which was pretty painless, so it “feels” OK to spend a lot of it without counting the pennies.
With that (cheap, and worth every every penny) psycholgical profile, I’d say that you should just find a place you like, and make sure that a loss of 30% of the price would not exceed your prior gains.
May 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM #392747patientrenterParticipantNo one has a crystal ball, so it’s a question of odds. With that, here are my thoughts.
If you want to give yourself the best odds of the best financial outcome, then you should wait. All the negative factors that hit the lower end of the SD market haven’t percolated through to the high end yet. (A few people here think they never will but, as I said, it’s a question of judging the odds…)
Psychologically, it’s a completely different story. Most people who bought houses in the last few years paid with what I will call “Monopoly money”. That’s why they could bring themselves to write a check for $1 million for a dumpy place. For every 100 people who wrote that check, there were only a few who had actually saved most of that money by spending that much less than their net earnings stripped of capital gains. Most of the others borrowed most of the money, expecting to pay the loans back painlessly from a higher future sale price, or they used prior gains from previous home price appreciation (“equity”). It was therefore easy money, and they spent it more freely.
Based on your comments, I am guessing that you have a large pot of money for this next home purchase, and a lot of that money came for substantial prior home price appreciation. Each $1 of your housing pot didn’t come from a $1 saved by scouring the supermarket shelves for good deals, or taking cheap vacations, or some other self-denial. It came from high previous asset price appreciation, which was pretty painless, so it “feels” OK to spend a lot of it without counting the pennies.
With that (cheap, and worth every every penny) psycholgical profile, I’d say that you should just find a place you like, and make sure that a loss of 30% of the price would not exceed your prior gains.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.