Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Older townhomes in Scripps Ranch
- This topic has 75 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2010 at 6:50 PM #591226August 15, 2010 at 8:12 PM #591873bearishgurlParticipant
SDR, I agree that an SFR would be a better choice for someone with a family. I too, would not purchase a condo, even if I would be living alone in it with my dog and cats.
As I recall, Scarlett had a $500K cap as the limit she could spend on a property and didn’t want to live in areas where she could get an offer accepted for <$500K on an SFR. That leaves three choices, buying a (larger) townhome now that is affordable in one of her "choice" areas, deciding to consider SFR's in areas she previously didn't want to live in or continue waiting, hoping SFR's go down in her "choice" areas. Correct me if I don't have your story correct, Scarlett.
August 15, 2010 at 8:12 PM #591333bearishgurlParticipantSDR, I agree that an SFR would be a better choice for someone with a family. I too, would not purchase a condo, even if I would be living alone in it with my dog and cats.
As I recall, Scarlett had a $500K cap as the limit she could spend on a property and didn’t want to live in areas where she could get an offer accepted for <$500K on an SFR. That leaves three choices, buying a (larger) townhome now that is affordable in one of her "choice" areas, deciding to consider SFR's in areas she previously didn't want to live in or continue waiting, hoping SFR's go down in her "choice" areas. Correct me if I don't have your story correct, Scarlett.
August 15, 2010 at 8:12 PM #591241bearishgurlParticipantSDR, I agree that an SFR would be a better choice for someone with a family. I too, would not purchase a condo, even if I would be living alone in it with my dog and cats.
As I recall, Scarlett had a $500K cap as the limit she could spend on a property and didn’t want to live in areas where she could get an offer accepted for <$500K on an SFR. That leaves three choices, buying a (larger) townhome now that is affordable in one of her "choice" areas, deciding to consider SFR's in areas she previously didn't want to live in or continue waiting, hoping SFR's go down in her "choice" areas. Correct me if I don't have your story correct, Scarlett.
August 15, 2010 at 8:12 PM #591982bearishgurlParticipantSDR, I agree that an SFR would be a better choice for someone with a family. I too, would not purchase a condo, even if I would be living alone in it with my dog and cats.
As I recall, Scarlett had a $500K cap as the limit she could spend on a property and didn’t want to live in areas where she could get an offer accepted for <$500K on an SFR. That leaves three choices, buying a (larger) townhome now that is affordable in one of her "choice" areas, deciding to consider SFR's in areas she previously didn't want to live in or continue waiting, hoping SFR's go down in her "choice" areas. Correct me if I don't have your story correct, Scarlett.
August 15, 2010 at 8:12 PM #592292bearishgurlParticipantSDR, I agree that an SFR would be a better choice for someone with a family. I too, would not purchase a condo, even if I would be living alone in it with my dog and cats.
As I recall, Scarlett had a $500K cap as the limit she could spend on a property and didn’t want to live in areas where she could get an offer accepted for <$500K on an SFR. That leaves three choices, buying a (larger) townhome now that is affordable in one of her "choice" areas, deciding to consider SFR's in areas she previously didn't want to live in or continue waiting, hoping SFR's go down in her "choice" areas. Correct me if I don't have your story correct, Scarlett.
August 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM #591987ScarlettParticipantPretty accurate, BG. #2 choice, I don’t think I will. I’d rahter rent and have a better commute and/or school districts. Or buy a larger townhome; I’ve had a 1600 sf one, I rent a 1700 sf one and it’d work fine; yard would be nice, but I had one before and never got the time to enjoy it, though I landscaped it very nicely and it was a bit of work. I also think the prices for nicer properties in good school districts are still nuts, and then there’s pleny of demand on a relatively low inventory.
SD R, I don’t think I am really looking to buy for a long time. I am just poking around for 3 years now, not really wanting to move again. I bought in 2004, sold our townhome in 2007, and renting since then in UTC – with a wonderfully short commute. Yes, I am waiting for prices to fall. I got burned once, just got out in the nick of time. Much more cautious 2nd time around. Moving is a big pain and expense and waste of time.
Right now the incetive to buy is to not pay $2300 rent down the drain when we can pay a mortgage and maybe gain equity.
I have also a kid that’s entering kindergarten next Fall, which makes us consider moving in spring in an area where we’d be likely to buy – we kind of narrowed it down to PQ, CMR, and SR…It could be another rental, or we maybe get lucky and buy something. I am still considering continuing to rent where we are and let the kid go the Doyle Elementary in SDUSD, it’s an 8, but so what.
August 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM #591246ScarlettParticipantPretty accurate, BG. #2 choice, I don’t think I will. I’d rahter rent and have a better commute and/or school districts. Or buy a larger townhome; I’ve had a 1600 sf one, I rent a 1700 sf one and it’d work fine; yard would be nice, but I had one before and never got the time to enjoy it, though I landscaped it very nicely and it was a bit of work. I also think the prices for nicer properties in good school districts are still nuts, and then there’s pleny of demand on a relatively low inventory.
SD R, I don’t think I am really looking to buy for a long time. I am just poking around for 3 years now, not really wanting to move again. I bought in 2004, sold our townhome in 2007, and renting since then in UTC – with a wonderfully short commute. Yes, I am waiting for prices to fall. I got burned once, just got out in the nick of time. Much more cautious 2nd time around. Moving is a big pain and expense and waste of time.
Right now the incetive to buy is to not pay $2300 rent down the drain when we can pay a mortgage and maybe gain equity.
I have also a kid that’s entering kindergarten next Fall, which makes us consider moving in spring in an area where we’d be likely to buy – we kind of narrowed it down to PQ, CMR, and SR…It could be another rental, or we maybe get lucky and buy something. I am still considering continuing to rent where we are and let the kid go the Doyle Elementary in SDUSD, it’s an 8, but so what.
August 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM #592297ScarlettParticipantPretty accurate, BG. #2 choice, I don’t think I will. I’d rahter rent and have a better commute and/or school districts. Or buy a larger townhome; I’ve had a 1600 sf one, I rent a 1700 sf one and it’d work fine; yard would be nice, but I had one before and never got the time to enjoy it, though I landscaped it very nicely and it was a bit of work. I also think the prices for nicer properties in good school districts are still nuts, and then there’s pleny of demand on a relatively low inventory.
SD R, I don’t think I am really looking to buy for a long time. I am just poking around for 3 years now, not really wanting to move again. I bought in 2004, sold our townhome in 2007, and renting since then in UTC – with a wonderfully short commute. Yes, I am waiting for prices to fall. I got burned once, just got out in the nick of time. Much more cautious 2nd time around. Moving is a big pain and expense and waste of time.
Right now the incetive to buy is to not pay $2300 rent down the drain when we can pay a mortgage and maybe gain equity.
I have also a kid that’s entering kindergarten next Fall, which makes us consider moving in spring in an area where we’d be likely to buy – we kind of narrowed it down to PQ, CMR, and SR…It could be another rental, or we maybe get lucky and buy something. I am still considering continuing to rent where we are and let the kid go the Doyle Elementary in SDUSD, it’s an 8, but so what.
August 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM #591878ScarlettParticipantPretty accurate, BG. #2 choice, I don’t think I will. I’d rahter rent and have a better commute and/or school districts. Or buy a larger townhome; I’ve had a 1600 sf one, I rent a 1700 sf one and it’d work fine; yard would be nice, but I had one before and never got the time to enjoy it, though I landscaped it very nicely and it was a bit of work. I also think the prices for nicer properties in good school districts are still nuts, and then there’s pleny of demand on a relatively low inventory.
SD R, I don’t think I am really looking to buy for a long time. I am just poking around for 3 years now, not really wanting to move again. I bought in 2004, sold our townhome in 2007, and renting since then in UTC – with a wonderfully short commute. Yes, I am waiting for prices to fall. I got burned once, just got out in the nick of time. Much more cautious 2nd time around. Moving is a big pain and expense and waste of time.
Right now the incetive to buy is to not pay $2300 rent down the drain when we can pay a mortgage and maybe gain equity.
I have also a kid that’s entering kindergarten next Fall, which makes us consider moving in spring in an area where we’d be likely to buy – we kind of narrowed it down to PQ, CMR, and SR…It could be another rental, or we maybe get lucky and buy something. I am still considering continuing to rent where we are and let the kid go the Doyle Elementary in SDUSD, it’s an 8, but so what.
August 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM #591338ScarlettParticipantPretty accurate, BG. #2 choice, I don’t think I will. I’d rahter rent and have a better commute and/or school districts. Or buy a larger townhome; I’ve had a 1600 sf one, I rent a 1700 sf one and it’d work fine; yard would be nice, but I had one before and never got the time to enjoy it, though I landscaped it very nicely and it was a bit of work. I also think the prices for nicer properties in good school districts are still nuts, and then there’s pleny of demand on a relatively low inventory.
SD R, I don’t think I am really looking to buy for a long time. I am just poking around for 3 years now, not really wanting to move again. I bought in 2004, sold our townhome in 2007, and renting since then in UTC – with a wonderfully short commute. Yes, I am waiting for prices to fall. I got burned once, just got out in the nick of time. Much more cautious 2nd time around. Moving is a big pain and expense and waste of time.
Right now the incetive to buy is to not pay $2300 rent down the drain when we can pay a mortgage and maybe gain equity.
I have also a kid that’s entering kindergarten next Fall, which makes us consider moving in spring in an area where we’d be likely to buy – we kind of narrowed it down to PQ, CMR, and SR…It could be another rental, or we maybe get lucky and buy something. I am still considering continuing to rent where we are and let the kid go the Doyle Elementary in SDUSD, it’s an 8, but so what.
August 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM #592353SD RealtorParticipantIt is a tough call Scarlett made much moreso by the easy credit which will enhance the mortgage verses rent payment. The distortions caused by market maniplulation make it oh so impossible to forecast when a major decline will happen again in housing. Clearly the govt has shown that can and will fight off natural causes in any way they can even if it means zombifying the banks and lenders and plundering the tax rolls. Until the bond market distorts it seems the manipulation can continue. However once the bond markets do distort and mortgage rates jack up, there is nowhere to go for pricing but down. That will finally initiate the needed cleansing. It will be awhile though.
August 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM #592042SD RealtorParticipantIt is a tough call Scarlett made much moreso by the easy credit which will enhance the mortgage verses rent payment. The distortions caused by market maniplulation make it oh so impossible to forecast when a major decline will happen again in housing. Clearly the govt has shown that can and will fight off natural causes in any way they can even if it means zombifying the banks and lenders and plundering the tax rolls. Until the bond market distorts it seems the manipulation can continue. However once the bond markets do distort and mortgage rates jack up, there is nowhere to go for pricing but down. That will finally initiate the needed cleansing. It will be awhile though.
August 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM #591933SD RealtorParticipantIt is a tough call Scarlett made much moreso by the easy credit which will enhance the mortgage verses rent payment. The distortions caused by market maniplulation make it oh so impossible to forecast when a major decline will happen again in housing. Clearly the govt has shown that can and will fight off natural causes in any way they can even if it means zombifying the banks and lenders and plundering the tax rolls. Until the bond market distorts it seems the manipulation can continue. However once the bond markets do distort and mortgage rates jack up, there is nowhere to go for pricing but down. That will finally initiate the needed cleansing. It will be awhile though.
August 15, 2010 at 11:56 PM #591301SD RealtorParticipantIt is a tough call Scarlett made much moreso by the easy credit which will enhance the mortgage verses rent payment. The distortions caused by market maniplulation make it oh so impossible to forecast when a major decline will happen again in housing. Clearly the govt has shown that can and will fight off natural causes in any way they can even if it means zombifying the banks and lenders and plundering the tax rolls. Until the bond market distorts it seems the manipulation can continue. However once the bond markets do distort and mortgage rates jack up, there is nowhere to go for pricing but down. That will finally initiate the needed cleansing. It will be awhile though.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.