- This topic has 330 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 15, 2008 at 9:45 PM #170982March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170550NotCrankyParticipant
Rustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170884NotCrankyParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170891NotCrankyParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170910NotCrankyParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170988NotCrankyParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170556jficquetteParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170889jficquetteParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170896jficquetteParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170915jficquetteParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170993jficquetteParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170599AnonymousGuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170929AnonymousGuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170936AnonymousGuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170955AnonymousGuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.