- This topic has 330 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 15, 2008 at 9:45 PM #170982March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170550
NotCranky
ParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170884NotCranky
ParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170891NotCranky
ParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170910NotCranky
ParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM #170988NotCranky
ParticipantRustico, I think I need to stop posting. Computer addiction is not healthy.
Could be a phase? I spent a lot of time here when I first started. Came from being isolated while building my house. Every component of my life is better for having backed off. I am very grateful for this site.
SDR I thought your OP was fine.
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170556jficquette
ParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170889jficquette
ParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170896jficquette
ParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170915jficquette
ParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 15, 2008 at 9:53 PM #170993jficquette
ParticipantBush won the 2000 election by less then 200 votes in Florida. Kennedy won the 1960 election by less then a few hundred votes in Chicago. Bush won Ohio in the last election by a few hundred votes.
743 votes may not seem like much but multiply that by 435 congressional districts.
Why are you so defensive about the lack of integrity in our electoral process?
Don’t you think it’s significant that our elections can be determined by people who are not entitled to vote?
Are you an Illegal?? You seem to be really paranoid that I am bringing up the facts.
John
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170599Anonymous
GuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170929Anonymous
GuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170936Anonymous
GuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
March 16, 2008 at 12:45 AM #170955Anonymous
GuestAll I can say is if you think Democratization of the Middle East is necesary for the survival of the U.S. you are an abosulute nutjob. And please, Iran isn’t the greatest threat in the world either. You guys have no clue about the world. Iran may be the greatest threat to Israel, but that is an irrelevant country of less than 7 million people.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.